These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10793388)

  • 1. Evaluation of impression accuracy for osseointegrated implant supported superstructures.
    Herbst D; Nel JC; Driessen CH; Becker PJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 May; 83(5):555-61. PubMed ID: 10793388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis.
    Del'Acqua MA; Arioli-Filho JN; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):226-36. PubMed ID: 18548918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.
    Al-Abdullah K; Zandparsa R; Finkelman M; Hirayama H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 23929370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 2 - comparison of splinting techniques.
    Filho HG; Mazaro JV; Vedovatto E; Assunção WG; dos Santos PH
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 19178624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Master cast accuracy in single-tooth implant replacement cases: an in vitro comparison. A technical note.
    Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):455-60. PubMed ID: 15973958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An evaluation of impression techniques for multiple internal connection implant prostheses.
    Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Nov; 92(5):470-6. PubMed ID: 15523336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the accuracy of plastic and metal stock trays for implant impressions.
    Del'acqua MA; de Avila ÉD; Amaral ÂL; Pinelli LA; de Assis Mollo F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):544-50. PubMed ID: 22616047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of implant casts generated with splinted and non-splinted impression techniques for edentulous patients: an optical scanning study.
    Papaspyridakos P; Benic GI; Hogsett VL; White GS; Lal K; Gallucci GO
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jun; 23(6):676-681. PubMed ID: 21631595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro comparison of master cast accuracy for single-tooth implant replacement.
    Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 May; 83(5):562-6. PubMed ID: 10793389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.
    Choi JH; Lim YJ; Yim SH; Kim CW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Verification jig for implant-supported prostheses: A comparison of standard impressions with verification jigs made of different materials.
    De La Cruz JE; Funkenbusch PD; Ercoli C; Moss ME; Graser GN; Tallents RH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Sep; 88(3):329-36. PubMed ID: 12426505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The accuracy of implant master casts constructed from transfer impressions.
    Humphries RM; Yaman P; Bloem TJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1990; 5(4):331-6. PubMed ID: 2094651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of implant impression splinted techniques: effect of splinting material.
    Assif D; Nissan J; Varsano I; Singer A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(6):885-8. PubMed ID: 10612928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative study of the polyvinyl siloxane technique with resin-splinted transfer copings used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Ferreira VF; Barboza EP; Gouvêa CV; Bianchini GM; Mussallem F; Carvalho WR
    Implant Dent; 2012 Feb; 21(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 22214989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of impression coping splinting on the accuracy of the open-tray technique.
    Kavadia V; Kourtis S; Zoidis P; Sarafianou A
    Gen Dent; 2019; 67(3):e5-e9. PubMed ID: 31199752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of splinting in accuracy of two implant impression techniques.
    de Avila ED; de Matos Moraes F; Castanharo SM; Del'Acqua MA; de Assis Mollo F
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):633-9. PubMed ID: 25506658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dimensional accuracy of different techniques used for complete-arch multi-implant impressions.
    Ghanem RA; Nassani MZ; Baroudi K; Abdel Fattah A
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2016 Aug; 7(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 25944669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of splint material rigidity in implant impression techniques.
    Del Acqua MA; Chavez AM; Castanharo SM; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1153-8. PubMed ID: 21197492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of implant impressions without impression copings: a three-dimensional analysis.
    Kwon JH; Son YH; Han CH; Kim S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jun; 105(6):367-73. PubMed ID: 21640237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.