These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10793897)

  • 1. A model of the perceived relative positions of moving objects based upon a slow averaging process.
    Krekelberg B; Lappe M
    Vision Res; 2000; 40(2):201-15. PubMed ID: 10793897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic distortion of visual position representation around moving objects.
    Watanabe K; Yokoi K
    J Vis; 2008 Mar; 8(3):13.1-11. PubMed ID: 18484819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attraction of flashes to moving dots.
    Yilmaz O; Tripathy SP; Patel SS; Ogmen H
    Vision Res; 2007 Sep; 47(20):2603-15. PubMed ID: 17697692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Illusory spatial offset of a flash relative to a moving stimulus is caused by differential latencies for moving and flashed stimuli.
    Whitney D; Murakami I; Cavanagh P
    Vision Res; 2000; 40(2):137-49. PubMed ID: 10793892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of flashed and moving probes in the flash-lag effect: evidence for misbinding of abrupt and continuous changes.
    Gauch A; Kerzel D
    Vision Res; 2008 Jul; 48(15):1584-91. PubMed ID: 18538814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The perceived position of a moving object is not the result of position integration.
    Shen M; Zhou J; Gao T; Liang J; Shui R
    Vision Res; 2007 Nov; 47(24):3088-95. PubMed ID: 17905405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differential latencies and the dynamics of the position computation process for moving targets, assessed with the flash-lag effect.
    Oğmen H; Patel SS; Bedell HE; Camuz K
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(18):2109-28. PubMed ID: 15183678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Temporal dependence of local motion induced shifts in perceived position.
    Durant S; Johnston A
    Vision Res; 2004 Feb; 44(4):357-66. PubMed ID: 14659962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Temporal recruitment along the trajectory of moving objects and the perception of position.
    Krekelberg B; Lappe M
    Vision Res; 1999 Aug; 39(16):2669-79. PubMed ID: 10492829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence for an attentional component of the perceptual misalignment between moving and flashing stimuli.
    Baldo MV; Kihara AH; Namba J; Klein SA
    Perception; 2002; 31(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 11971260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Strikingly rapid neural basis of motion-induced position shifts revealed by high temporal-resolution EEG pattern classification.
    Hogendoorn H; Verstraten FA; Cavanagh P
    Vision Res; 2015 Aug; 113(Pt A):1-10. PubMed ID: 26021721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High temporal frequency adaptation compresses time in the Flash-Lag illusion.
    Rowland E; Durant S
    Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():130-6. PubMed ID: 25318014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Magnocellular visual pathway and the flash-lag illusion.
    Chappell M; Mullen KT
    J Vis; 2010 Sep; 10(11):24. PubMed ID: 20884519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The "Flash-Lag" effect occurs in audition and cross-modally.
    Alais D; Burr D
    Curr Biol; 2003 Jan; 13(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 12526746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceived shifts of flashed stimuli by visible and invisible object motion.
    Watanabe K; Sato TR; Shimojo S
    Perception; 2003; 32(5):545-59. PubMed ID: 12854641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Motion extrapolation in the flash-lag effect depends on perceived, rather than physical speed.
    Yook J; Lee L; Vossel S; Weidner R; Hogendoorn H
    Vision Res; 2022 Apr; 193():107978. PubMed ID: 34942429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An illusory distortion of moving form driven by motion deblurring.
    Marinovic W; Arnold DH
    Vision Res; 2013 Aug; 88():47-54. PubMed ID: 23747754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of attention in motion extrapolation: are moving objects 'corrected' or flashed objects attentionally delayed?
    Khurana B; Watanabe K; Nijhawan R
    Perception; 2000; 29(6):675-92. PubMed ID: 11040951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Motion signals bias localization judgments: a unified explanation for the flash-lag, flash-drag, flash-jump, and Frohlich illusions.
    Eagleman DM; Sejnowski TJ
    J Vis; 2007 Mar; 7(4):3. PubMed ID: 17461687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Flash-lag effect: complicating motion extrapolation of the moving reference-stimulus paradoxically augments the effect.
    Bachmann T; Murd C; Põder E
    Psychol Res; 2012 Sep; 76(5):654-66. PubMed ID: 21818621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.