These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10793968)

  • 1. Latitude and noise comparisons between digital cameras and a radiographic film scanner.
    Whitehouse R; Moulding F
    J Telemed Telecare; 2000; 6 Suppl 1():S41-2. PubMed ID: 10793968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of radiographic image quality from four digitization devices as viewed on computer monitors.
    Davidson HC; Johnston DJ; Christian ME; Harnsberger HR
    J Digit Imaging; 2001 Mar; 14(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 11310912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital vs 35-mm photography. To convert or not to convert?
    Kokoska MS; Currens JW; Hollenbeak CS; Thomas JR; Stack BC
    Arch Facial Plast Surg; 1999; 1(4):276-81. PubMed ID: 10937115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Standardizing digital photography: it's not all in the eye of the beholder.
    Galdino GM; Vogel JE; Vander Kolk CA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2001 Oct; 108(5):1334-44. PubMed ID: 11604641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance characteristics of a laser scanner and laser printer system for radiological imaging.
    Lo SC; Taira RK; Mankovich NJ; Huang HK; Takeuchi H
    Comput Radiol; 1986; 10(5):227-37. PubMed ID: 3802789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Newer imaging methods in chest radiography.
    Wandtke JC
    J Thorac Imaging; 1990 Jan; 5(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 2299696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital systems require x-ray charts too.
    Eastman TR
    Radiol Technol; 1996; 67(4):354. PubMed ID: 8778917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Current status of digital projectional radiography of the chest.
    Aberle DR; Hansell D; Huang HK
    J Thorac Imaging; 1990 Jan; 5(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 2299698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can We Trust the Use of Smartphone Cameras in Clinical Practice? Laypeople Assessment of Their Image Quality.
    Boissin C; Fleming J; Wallis L; Hasselberg M; Laflamme L
    Telemed J E Health; 2015 Nov; 21(11):887-92. PubMed ID: 26076033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 35-mm film scanner as an intraoral dental radiograph digitizer. I: A quantitative evaluation.
    Shrout MK; Potter BJ; Yurgalavage HM; Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Oct; 76(4):502-9. PubMed ID: 8233432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clarity and diagnostic quality of digitized conventional intraoral radiographs.
    Goga R; Chandler NP; Love RM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 15314002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Noise analysis of a digital radiography system.
    Arnold BA; Scheibe PO
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Mar; 142(3):609-13. PubMed ID: 6364749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital cameras for reproducing radiologic images: evaluation of three cameras.
    Sistrom CL; Gay SB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Feb; 170(2):279-84. PubMed ID: 9456929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. High-resolution digital imaging with storage phosphors.
    Fuhrman CR; Gur D; Schaetzing R
    J Thorac Imaging; 1990 Jan; 5(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 2299699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comprehensive physical image quality evaluation of a selenium based digital x-ray imaging system for thorax radiography.
    Launders JH; Kengyelics SM; Cowen AR
    Med Phys; 1998 Jun; 25(6):986-97. PubMed ID: 9650189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Digital mammography: performance evaluation parameters and available systems in France].
    Stines J; Noel A; Heid P
    J Radiol; 2007; 88(7-8 Pt 1):933-42. PubMed ID: 17878849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of seven digital cameras for digitizing radiographs.
    Brault B; Hoskinson J; Armbrust L; Milliken G
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2004; 45(4):298-304. PubMed ID: 15373251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An investigation into the speed and resolution of various blue and green film-fluorescent screen combinations available for Odelca 100 mm camera units.
    Pashley P
    Radiography; 1974 Jan; 40(469):15-22. PubMed ID: 4810257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Changes in radiological technology research for medical imaging: from analogue to digital image studies].
    JSRT Imaging Section
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2014 Jan; 70(1):89-101. PubMed ID: 24464069
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Two technologies for designing digital X-ray image detectors].
    Borisov AA; Veĭp IuA; Mazurov AI; Elinson MB
    Med Tekh; 2006; (5):7-10. PubMed ID: 17133935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.