These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10794226)

  • 1. The spatial location of impingement in total hip arthroplasty.
    Yamaguchi M; Akisue T; Bauer TW; Hashimoto Y
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Apr; 15(3):305-13. PubMed ID: 10794226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios.
    D'Lima DD; Urquhart AG; Buehler KO; Walker RH; Colwell CW
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Mar; 82(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 10724224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acetabular Cup Anteversion and Inclination in Hip Range of Motion to Impingement.
    McCarthy TF; Alipit V; Nevelos J; Elmallah RK; Mont MA
    J Arthroplasty; 2016 Sep; 31(9 Suppl):264-8. PubMed ID: 27067753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Component impingement in total hip arthroplasty: frequency and risk factors. A continuous retrieval analysis series of 416 cup.
    Marchetti E; Krantz N; Berton C; Bocquet D; Fouilleron N; Migaud H; Girard J
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2011 Apr; 97(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 21377948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impingement in total hip arthroplasty a study of retrieved acetabular components.
    Shon WY; Baldini T; Peterson MG; Wright TM; Salvati EA
    J Arthroplasty; 2005 Jun; 20(4):427-35. PubMed ID: 16124957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal acetabular component orientation estimated using edge-loading and impingement risk in patients with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Mellon SJ; Grammatopoulos G; Andersen MS; Pandit HG; Gill HS; Murray DW
    J Biomech; 2015 Jan; 48(2):318-23. PubMed ID: 25482661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Even the Intraoperative Knowledge of Femoral Stem Anteversion Cannot Prevent Impingement in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Weber M; Woerner ML; Sendtner E; Völlner F; Grifka J; Renkawitz TF
    J Arthroplasty; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2514-2519. PubMed ID: 27236745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cup-neck impingement due to the malposition of the implant as a possible mechanism for metallosis in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.
    Onda K; Nagoya S; Kaya M; Yamashita T
    Orthopedics; 2008 Apr; 31(4):396. PubMed ID: 19292272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impingement between the acetabular cup and the femoral neck after hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Yoo MC; Cho YJ; Chun YS; Rhyu KH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 May; 93 Suppl 2():99-106. PubMed ID: 21543698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Effect of Pelvic Tilt and Femoral Head Size on Hip Range-of-Motion to Impingement.
    McCarthy TF; Nevelos J; Elmallah RK; Chughtai M; Khlopas A; Alipit V; Wagner TC; Mont MA
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Nov; 32(11):3544-3549. PubMed ID: 28712801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impingement with total hip replacement.
    Malik A; Maheshwari A; Dorr LD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Aug; 89(8):1832-42. PubMed ID: 17671025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of native anatomy with recommended safe component orientation in total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis.
    Merle C; Grammatopoulos G; Waldstein W; Pegg E; Pandit H; Aldinger PR; Gill HS; Murray DW
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Nov; 95(22):e172. PubMed ID: 24257672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Polyethylene wear vector in vivo: a three-dimensional analysis using retrieved acetabular components and radiographs.
    Yamaguchi M; Hashimoto Y; Akisue T; Bauer TW
    J Orthop Res; 1999 Sep; 17(5):695-702. PubMed ID: 10569478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does neck/liner impingement increase wear of ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene liners?
    Usrey MM; Noble PC; Rudner LJ; Conditt MA; Birman MV; Santore RF; Mathis KB
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Sep; 21(6 Suppl 2):65-71. PubMed ID: 16950064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion.
    Widmer KH; Zurfluh B
    J Orthop Res; 2004 Jul; 22(4):815-21. PubMed ID: 15183439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Iliopsoas impingement in 12 patients with a total hip arthroplasty].
    Bricteux S; Beguin L; Fessy MH
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2001 Dec; 87(8):820-5. PubMed ID: 11845086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Theoretically optimum position of the prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty to fulfill the severe range of motion criteria due to neck impingement.
    Hisatome T; Doi H
    J Orthop Sci; 2011 Mar; 16(2):229-37. PubMed ID: 21359509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Polyethylene wear after total hip arthroplasty: the effect of a modular femoral head with an extended flange-reinforced neck.
    Urquhart AG; D'Lima DD; Venn-Watson E; Colwell CW; Walker RH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1998 Nov; 80(11):1641-7. PubMed ID: 9840633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-dimensional analysis of multiple wear vectors in retrieved acetabular cups.
    Yamaguchi M; Bauer TW; Hashimoto Y
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Oct; 79(10):1539-44. PubMed ID: 9378740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differences in range of motion with the same combined anteversion after total hip arthroplasty.
    Ohmori T; Kabata T; Kajino Y; Taga T; Hasegawa K; Inoue D; Yamamoto T; Takagi T; Yoshitani J; Ueno T; Tsuchiya H
    Int Orthop; 2018 May; 42(5):1021-1028. PubMed ID: 28990125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.