171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10794245)
1. A new induction-based impact method for measuring intraocular pressure.
Kontiola AI
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2000 Apr; 78(2):142-5. PubMed ID: 10794245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [How does central cornea thickness influence intraocular pressure during applanation and contour tonometry?].
Schwenteck T; Knappe M; Moros I
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2012 Sep; 229(9):917-27. PubMed ID: 22972357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical comparison of ocular blood flow tonometer, Tonopen, and Goldmann applanation tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure in postkeratoplasty eyes.
Rao VJ; Gnanaraj L; Mitchell KW; Figueiredo FC
Cornea; 2001 Nov; 20(8):834-8. PubMed ID: 11685061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Evaluation of accuracy of measuring intraocular pressure by handheld non-contact applanation tonometer].
Chen X; Peng D; Zhou W; Zhong Y
Yan Ke Xue Bao; 1995 Jun; 11(2):86-8. PubMed ID: 9208659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the use of new handheld tonometers and established applanation tonometers in dogs.
Görig C; Coenen RT; Stades FC; Djajadiningrat-Laanen SC; Boevé MH
Am J Vet Res; 2006 Jan; 67(1):134-44. PubMed ID: 16426223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of intraocular pressure measurements obtained by use of a rebound tonometer and applanation tonometer in dogs before and after elective phacoemulsification.
Thompson-Hom AL; Gerding PA
Am J Vet Res; 2012 May; 73(5):709-13. PubMed ID: 22533404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Reliability and reproducibility of introcular pressure (IOP) measurement with the Icare
Valero B; Fénolland JR; Rosenberg R; Sendon D; Mesnard C; Sigaux M; Giraud JM; Renard JP
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2017 Dec; 40(10):865-875. PubMed ID: 29174296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers.
Nakamura M; Darhad U; Tatsumi Y; Fujioka M; Kusuhara A; Maeda H; Negi A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Aug; 142(2):332-4. PubMed ID: 16876523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of intraocular pressure values obtained using a Goldmann applanation tonometer and a handheld version of applanation resonance tonometer: A preliminary report.
Mulak M; Czak WA; Mimier M; Kaczmarek R
Adv Clin Exp Med; 2018 Apr; 27(4):481-485. PubMed ID: 29558028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical comparison of the measurement of the IOP with the ocular blood flow tonometer, the Tonopen XL and the Goldmann applanation tonometer.
Bafa M; Lambrinakis I; Dayan M; Birch M
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2001 Feb; 79(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 11167279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new electromechanical method for measuring intraocular pressure.
Kontiola A
Doc Ophthalmol; 1996-1997; 93(3):265-76. PubMed ID: 9550354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Method for the noninvasive measurement of intraocular pressure in mice.
Danias J; Kontiola AI; Filippopoulos T; Mittag T
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Mar; 44(3):1138-41. PubMed ID: 12601041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Goldmann applanation tonometer versus ocular response analyzer for measuring intraocular pressure after congenital cataract surgery.
Feizi S; Faramarzi A; Kheiri B
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 28(5):582-589. PubMed ID: 30246567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement between rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in treated glaucoma patients.
Vincent SJ; Vincent RA; Shields D; Lee GA
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012; 40(4):e163-70. PubMed ID: 21883774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Goldmann applanation versus hand-applanation and .schiötz indentation tonometry.
Krieglstein GK; Waller WK
Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol; 1975; 194(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 1079117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Non-invasive determination of intraocular pressure in the rat eye. Comparison of an electronic tonometer (TonoPen), and a rebound (impact probe) tonometer.
Goldblum D; Kontiola AI; Mittag T; Chen B; Danias J
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Nov; 240(11):942-6. PubMed ID: 12486518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the ICare rebound tonometer with the Goldmann tonometer in a normal population.
Fernandes P; Díaz-Rey JA; Queirós A; Gonzalez-Meijome JM; Jorge J
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Sep; 25(5):436-40. PubMed ID: 16101950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical evaluation of the new TGDc-01 "PRA" palpebral tonometer: comparison with contact and non-contact tonometry.
García Resúa C; Giráldez Fernández MJ; Cerviño Expósito A; González Pérez J; Yebra-Pimentel E
Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Feb; 82(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 15711462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The evaluation of tonometry and self-tonometry with Ocuton tonometers.
Kóthy P; Nagymihály A; Holló G
Med Sci Monit; 2003 Jan; 9(1):PI1-4. PubMed ID: 12552251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Intraocular pressure measurements with the Proview self-tonometer in comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes].
Meyer MW; Yevelenko V; Hoy L; Meyer A; Erb C
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Nov; 223(11):899-903. PubMed ID: 17131250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
