91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10794999)
21. Ultrasound contrast agents: a promising future.
Robbin ML
Radiol Clin North Am; 2001 May; 39(3):399-414. PubMed ID: 11506084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Ultrasound contrast agents: properties, principles of action, tolerance, and artifacts.
Correas JM; Bridal L; Lesavre A; Méjean A; Claudon M; Hélénon O
Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(8):1316-28. PubMed ID: 11519538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Ultrasonic imaging artifacts. Physical bases].
Steiner E
Radiologe; 1993 Jan; 33(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 8441800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Ultrasound contrast agents. Examples of blood pool agents.
Correas JM; Hélénon O; Pourcelot L; Moreau JF
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1997; 412():101-12. PubMed ID: 9240088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluating image quality in high-res ultrasound.
Goldstein A
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1991 Dec; 13(12):89-100. PubMed ID: 10149751
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Ultrasound contrast imaging research.
Averkiou M; Powers J; Skyba D; Bruce M; Jensen S
Ultrasound Q; 2003 Mar; 19(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 12970614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Why do we need contrast agents for ultrasound?
Cosgrove D
Clin Radiol; 1996 Feb; 51 Suppl 1():1-4. PubMed ID: 8605763
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Ultrasound contrast imaging: current and new potential methods.
Frinking PJ; Bouakaz A; Kirkhorn J; Ten Cate FJ; de Jong N
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2000 Jul; 26(6):965-75. PubMed ID: 10996696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Sonographic contrast agents in vascular imaging.
Grant EG
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2001 Feb; 22(1):25-41. PubMed ID: 11300585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Clinical experience with sonographic contrast agents.
Melany ML; Grant EG
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 1997 Feb; 18(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 9143061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Perfecting the picture. Contrast agents to make ultrasound clearer, pricier.
Hensley S
Mod Healthc; 1998 Feb; 28(6):64. PubMed ID: 10176662
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Motion artifacts of pulse inversion-based tissue harmonic imaging.
Shen CC; Li PC
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2002 Sep; 49(9):1203-11. PubMed ID: 12243571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Bow artefact in B-image sonography].
Bönhof JA; Stapff M; Bönhof B; Kremer H; Zöllner N; Linhart P
Computertomographie; 1983 Sep; 3(3):133-7. PubMed ID: 6640584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A perfusion phantom for the evaluation of ultrasound contrast agents.
Hindle AJ; Perkins AC
Ultrasound Med Biol; 1994; 20(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 8059492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Safety of ultrasonic contrast agents.
Ultraschall Med; 1999 Jun; 20(3):122-3. PubMed ID: 10444784
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Ultrasound diagnosis].
Rettenmaier G
Ultraschall Med; 1996 Dec; 17(6):259. PubMed ID: 9082549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [Functional and early evaluation of treatments in oncology: interest of ultrasonographic contrast agents].
Lassau N; Lamuraglia M; Leclère J; Rouffiac V
J Radiol; 2004 May; 85(5 Pt 2):704-12. PubMed ID: 15238871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Tissue characterisation.
Taylor KJ; Wells PN
Ultrasound Med Biol; 1989; 15(5):421-8. PubMed ID: 2675444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Re: Quantitative Assessment of Solid Renal Masses by Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound with Time-Intensity Curves: How we do it.
Siegel C
J Urol; 2017 Feb; 197(2):315-316. PubMed ID: 28093137
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Symposium on image directed Doppler ultrasound.
J Clin Ultrasound; 1987; 15(9):567-703. PubMed ID: 3119666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
