These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10795985)
1. Calibration of plane-parallel chambers and determination of p(wall) for the NACP and Roos chambers for 60Co gamma-ray beams. Palm A; Mattsson O; Andreo P Phys Med Biol; 2000 Apr; 45(4):971-81. PubMed ID: 10795985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance analysis and determination of the p(wall) correction factor for 60Co gamma-ray beams for Wellhöfer Roos-type plane-parallel chambers. Palm A; Czap L; Andreo P; Mattsson O Phys Med Biol; 2002 Feb; 47(4):631-40. PubMed ID: 11900195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams. Huq MS; Andreo P; Song H Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):2985-3006. PubMed ID: 11720359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Wall correction factors for calibration of plane-parallel ionization chambers with high-energy photon beams. Araki F; Ikeda R; Shirakawa Y; Shimonobou T; Moribe N; Takada T; Takahashi M; Oura H; Matoba M Phys Med Biol; 2000 Sep; 45(9):2509-17. PubMed ID: 11008952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing calibration methods of electron beams using plane-parallel chambers with absorbed-dose to water based protocols. Stewart KJ; Seuntjens JP Med Phys; 2002 Mar; 29(3):284-9. PubMed ID: 11929010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy electron beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols. Saiful Huq M; Song H; Andreo P; Houser CJ Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2077-87. PubMed ID: 11695769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Air kerma calibration factors and chamber correction values for PTW soft x-ray, NACP and Roos ionization chambers at very low x-ray energies. Ipe NE; Rosser KE; Moretti CJ; Manning JW; Palmer MJ Phys Med Biol; 2001 Aug; 46(8):2107-17. PubMed ID: 11512614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A dosimetry study comparing NCS report-5, IAEA TRS-381, AAPM TG-51 and IAEA TRS-398 in three clinical electron beam energies. Palmans H; Nafaa L; de Patoul N; Denis JM; Tomsej M; Vynckier S Phys Med Biol; 2003 May; 48(9):1091-107. PubMed ID: 12765324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The use of plane-parallel chambers in electron dosimetry without any cross-calibration. Christ G; Dohm S; Bruggmoser G; Schüle E Phys Med Biol; 2002 May; 47(9):N121-6. PubMed ID: 12043825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ionization chamber dosimetry of proton beams using cylindrical and plane parallel chambers. Nw versus Nk ion chamber calibrations. Medin J; Andreo P; Grusell E; Mattsson O; Montelius A; Roos M Phys Med Biol; 1995 Jul; 40(7):1161-76. PubMed ID: 7568375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Determination of overall perturbation factors for plane-parallel ionization chambers in electron beams. Araki F; Shirakawa Y; Ikeda R; Shimonobou T; Moribe N; Takada T; Takahashi M; Oura H; Matoba M Igaku Butsuri; 2000; 20(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 12764248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Protocols for the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams: a comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and previous international codes of practice. International Atomic Energy Agency. Andreo P; Huq MS; Westermark M; Song H; Tilikidis A; DeWerd L; Shortt K Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep; 47(17):3033-53. PubMed ID: 12361209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison and uncertainty evaluation of different calibration protocols and ionization chambers for low-energy surface brachytherapy dosimetry. Candela-Juan C; Vijande J; García-Martínez T; Niatsetski Y; Nauta G; Schuurman J; Ouhib Z; Ballester F; Perez-Calatayud J Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4954-64. PubMed ID: 26233221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Absorbed dose to water based dosimetry versus air kerma based dosimetry for high-energy photon beams: an experimental study. Palmans H; Nafaa L; De JJ; Gillis S; Hoornaert MT; Martens C; Piessens M; Thierens H; Van der Plaetsen A; Vynckier S Phys Med Biol; 2002 Feb; 47(3):421-40. PubMed ID: 11848121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The calibration of parallel-plate electron ionization chambers at NPL for use with the IPEM 2003 code of practice: summary data. Bass G; Thomas R; Pearce J Phys Med Biol; 2009 Apr; 54(8):N115-24. PubMed ID: 19305037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Chamber-quality factors in 60Co for three plane-parallel chambers for the dosimetry of electrons, protons and heavier charged particles: PENELOPE Monte Carlo simulations. Panettieri V; Sempau J; Andreo P Phys Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 53(21):5917-26. PubMed ID: 18836218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The calibration and use of plane-parallel ionization chambers for dosimetry of electron beams: an extension of the 1983 AAPM protocol report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 39. Almond PR; Attix FH; Humphries LJ; Kubo H; Nath R; Goetsch S; Rogers DW Med Phys; 1994 Aug; 21(8):1251-60. PubMed ID: 7799867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetry using plane-parallel ionization chambers in a 75 MeV clinical proton beam. Palmans H; Verhaegen F; Denis JM; Vynckier S Phys Med Biol; 2002 Aug; 47(16):2895-905. PubMed ID: 12222853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Possibility of using cylindrical ionization chambers for percent depth-dose measurements in clinical electron beams. Ono T; Araki F; Yoshiyama F Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4647-54. PubMed ID: 21928637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microionization chamber air-kerma calibration coefficients as a function of photon energy for x-ray spectra in the range of 20-250 kVp relative to 60Co. Snow JR; Micka JA; DeWerd LA Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041711. PubMed ID: 23556881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]