These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10795986)

  • 1. Converting absorbed dose to medium to absorbed dose to water for Monte Carlo based photon beam dose calculations.
    Siebers JV; Keall PJ; Nahum AE; Mohan R
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Apr; 45(4):983-95. PubMed ID: 10795986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Calculation of absorbed dose and biological effectiveness from photonuclear reactions in a bremsstrahlung beam of end point 50 MeV.
    Gudowska I; Brahme A; Andreo P; Gudowski W; Kierkegaard J
    Phys Med Biol; 1999 Sep; 44(9):2099-125. PubMed ID: 10495108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bone and mucosal dosimetry in skin radiation therapy: a Monte Carlo study using kilovoltage photon and megavoltage electron beams.
    Chow JC; Jiang R
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jun; 57(12):3885-99. PubMed ID: 22642985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dose to 'water-like' media or dose to tissue in MV photons radiotherapy treatment planning: still a matter of debate.
    Andreo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 60(1):309-37. PubMed ID: 25503312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monte Carlo evaluation of tissue inhomogeneity effects in the treatment of the head and neck.
    Wang L; Yorke E; Chui CS
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Aug; 50(5):1339-49. PubMed ID: 11483347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Towards the standardization of the absorbed dose report mode in high energy photon beams.
    Younes T; Chauvin M; Delbaere A; Labour J; Fonteny V; Simon L; Fares G; Vieillevigne L
    Phys Med Biol; 2021 Feb; 66(4):045009. PubMed ID: 33296874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measurement of absorbed dose with a bone-equivalent extrapolation chamber.
    DeBlois F; Abdel-Rahman W; Seuntjens JP; Podgorsak EB
    Med Phys; 2002 Mar; 29(3):433-40. PubMed ID: 11929025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of non-standard CT conversion ramps for Monte Carlo verification of 6 MV prostate IMRT plans.
    Zarza-Moreno M; Cardoso I; Teixeira N; Jesus AP; Mora G
    Phys Med; 2013 Jun; 29(4):357-67. PubMed ID: 22677401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving the accuracy of converting dose to medium to dose to water algorithms in small megavoltage photon fields in dose to medium based treatment planning systems.
    Yang X; Cao Y; Shao Q; Li S; Lei M; Yang Z
    Phys Med; 2020 Mar; 71():62-70. PubMed ID: 32092687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of factors to convert absorbed dose calibrations from graphite to water for the NPL high-energy photon calibration service.
    Nutbrown RF; Duane S; Shipley DR; Thomas RA
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Feb; 47(3):441-54. PubMed ID: 11858210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of dose measurements and calculations within and beyond heterogeneous tissues for 6 MV photon fields smaller than 4 cm produced by Cyberknife.
    Wilcox EE; Daskalov GM
    Med Phys; 2008 Jun; 35(6):2259-66. PubMed ID: 18649456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fluence correction factors and stopping power ratios for clinical ion beams.
    Lühr A; Hansen DC; Sobolevsky N; Palmans H; Rossomme S; Bassler N
    Acta Oncol; 2011 Aug; 50(6):797-805. PubMed ID: 21767177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Monte Carlo calculations of electron beam quality conversion factors for several ion chamber types.
    Muir BR; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111701. PubMed ID: 25370615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
    Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
    Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combining tissue-phantom ratios to provide a beam-quality specifier for flattening filter free photon beams.
    Dalaryd M; Knöös T; Ceberg C
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111716. PubMed ID: 25370630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comments on 'Converting absorbed dose to medium to absorbed dose to water for Monte Carlo based photon beam dose calculations'.
    Fippel M; Nüsslin F
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Aug; 45(8):L17-9. PubMed ID: 10958207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Water/air mass stopping power ratios for megavoltage photon and electron beams.
    Nahum AE
    Phys Med Biol; 1978 Jan; 23(1):24-38. PubMed ID: 416446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monte Carlo and
    Lawless MJ; Dimaso L; Palmer B; Micka J; Culberson WS; DeWerd LA
    Med Phys; 2018 Dec; 45(12):5564-5576. PubMed ID: 30273996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the EGSnrc Monte Carlo code for interface dosimetry near high-Z media exposed to kilovolt and 60Co photons.
    Verhaegen F
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 May; 47(10):1691-705. PubMed ID: 12069087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An experimental and Monte Carlo investigation of the energy dependence of alanine/EPR dosimetry: I. Clinical x-ray beams.
    Zeng GG; McEwen MR; Rogers DW; Klassen NV
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Jan; 49(2):257-70. PubMed ID: 15083670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.