These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10795987)

  • 1. EEG dipole source localization using artificial neural networks.
    Van Hoey G; De Clercq J; Vanrumste B; Van De Walle R; Lemahieu I; D'Havé M; Boon P
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Apr; 45(4):997-1011. PubMed ID: 10795987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of dipole position, orientation and noise on the accuracy of EEG source localization.
    Whittingstall K; Stroink G; Gates L; Connolly JF; Finley A
    Biomed Eng Online; 2003 Jun; 2():14. PubMed ID: 12807534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of electrode location errors on EEG dipole source localization with a realistic head model.
    Wang Y; Gotman J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Sep; 112(9):1777-80. PubMed ID: 11514261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of skull conductivity perturbations on EEG dipole source analysis.
    Chen F; Hallez H; Staelens S
    Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4475-84. PubMed ID: 20879606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of performance of spherical and realistic head models in dipole localization from noisy EEG.
    Vanrumste B; Van Hoey G; Van de Walle R; D'Havé MR; Lemahieu IA; Boon PA
    Med Eng Phys; 2002 Jul; 24(6):403-18. PubMed ID: 12135649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Integrated approach of an artificial neural network and numerical analysis to multiple equivalent current dipole source localization.
    Kamijo K; Kiyuna T; Takaki Y; Kenmochi A; Tanigawa T; Yamazaki T
    Front Med Biol Eng; 2001; 10(4):285-301. PubMed ID: 11334169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dipole estimation errors due to differences in modeling anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis.
    Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Van Hese P; Delputte S; Lemahieu I
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(7):1877-94. PubMed ID: 18364544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of brain-to-skull conductivity ratio on EEG source localization accuracy.
    Wang G; Ren D
    Biomed Res Int; 2013; 2013():459346. PubMed ID: 23691502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neonatal EEG at scalp is focal and implies high skull conductivity in realistic neonatal head models.
    Odabaee M; Tokariev A; Layeghy S; Mesbah M; Colditz PB; Ramon C; Vanhatalo S
    Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 96():73-80. PubMed ID: 24736169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determination of head conductivity frequency response in vivo with optimized EIT-EEG.
    Dabek J; Kalogianni K; Rotgans E; van der Helm FCT; Kwakkel G; van Wegen EEH; Daffertshofer A; de Munck JC
    Neuroimage; 2016 Feb; 127():484-495. PubMed ID: 26589336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conventional and reciprocal approaches to the inverse dipole localization problem of electroencephalography.
    Finke S; Gulrajani RM; Gotman J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jun; 50(6):657-66. PubMed ID: 12814232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of skull anisotropy for the forward and inverse problem in EEG: simulation studies using FEM on realistic head models.
    Marin G; Guerin C; Baillet S; Garnero L; Meunier G
    Hum Brain Mapp; 1998; 6(4):250-69. PubMed ID: 9704264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validating EEG source imaging using intracranial electrical stimulation.
    Unnwongse K; Rampp S; Wehner T; Kowoll A; Parpaley Y; von Lehe M; Lanfer B; Rusiniak M; Wolters C; Wellmer J
    Brain Commun; 2023; 5(1):fcad023. PubMed ID: 36824389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Precision of dipole localization in a spherical volume conductor: a comparison of referential EEG, magnetoencephalography and scalp current density methods.
    Murro AM; Smith JR; King DW; Park YD
    Brain Topogr; 1995; 8(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 8793122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dipole estimation errors due to not incorporating anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis.
    Hallez H; Staelens S; Lemahieu I
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(20):6079-93. PubMed ID: 19779215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Channel selection and classification of electroencephalogram signals: an artificial neural network and genetic algorithm-based approach.
    Yang J; Singh H; Hines EL; Schlaghecken F; Iliescu DD; Leeson MS; Stocks NG
    Artif Intell Med; 2012 Jun; 55(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 22503644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A study of dipole localization accuracy for MEG and EEG using a human skull phantom.
    Leahy RM; Mosher JC; Spencer ME; Huang MX; Lewine JD
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998 Aug; 107(2):159-73. PubMed ID: 9751287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. EEG source localization: a neural network approach.
    Sclabassi RJ; Sonmez M; Sun M
    Neurol Res; 2001 Jul; 23(5):457-64. PubMed ID: 11474801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Subspace electrode selection methodology for the reduction of the effect of uncertain conductivity values in the EEG dipole localization: a simulation study using a patient-specific head model.
    Crevecoeur G; Restrepo VM; Staelens S
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Apr; 57(7):1963-86. PubMed ID: 22421525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Insidious errors in dipole localization parameters at a single time-point due to model misspecification of number of shells.
    Zhang Z; Jewett DL
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993; 88(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 7681385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.