These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10796938)
1. Assessment of visually lossless irreversible image compression: comparison of three methods by using an image-comparison workstation. Slone RM; Foos DH; Whiting BR; Muka E; Rubin DA; Pilgram TK; Kohm KS; Young SS; Ho P; Hendrickson DD Radiology; 2000 May; 215(2):543-53. PubMed ID: 10796938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Irreversible JPEG compression of digital chest radiographs for primary interpretation: assessment of visually lossless threshold. Slone RM; Muka E; Pilgram TK Radiology; 2003 Aug; 228(2):425-9. PubMed ID: 12893900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of perceptible artifacts in JPEG 2000-compressed chest CT images using mathematical and perceptual quality metrics. Kim B; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Mantiuk R; Hahn S; Kim TJ; Kim YH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Feb; 190(2):328-34. PubMed ID: 18212217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lossy three-dimensional JPEG2000 compression of abdominal CT images: assessment of the visually lossless threshold and effect of compression ratio on image quality. Ringl H; Schernthaner RE; Kulinna-Cosentini C; Weber M; Schaefer-Prokop C; Herold CJ; Schima W Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):467-74. PubMed ID: 17890355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Irreversible JPEG 2000 compression of abdominal CT for primary interpretation: assessment of visually lossless threshold. Lee KH; Kim YH; Kim BH; Kim KJ; Kim TJ; Kim HJ; Hahn S Eur Radiol; 2007 Jun; 17(6):1529-34. PubMed ID: 17119972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of image compression viability for lossy and lossless JPEG and Wavelet data reduction in coronary angiography. Brennecke R; Bürgel U; Rippin G; Post F; Rupprecht HJ; Meyer J Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2001 Feb; 17(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 11495503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of two compression algorithms and the detection of caries. Janhom A; van der Stelt PF; Sanderink GC Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jul; 31(4):257-63. PubMed ID: 12087443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Wavelet versus JPEG (Joint Photographic Expert Group) and fractal compression. Impact on the detection of low-contrast details in computed radiographs. Ricke J; Maass P; Lopez Hänninen E; Liebig T; Amthauer H; Stroszczynski C; Schauer W; Boskamp T; Wolf M Invest Radiol; 1998 Aug; 33(8):456-63. PubMed ID: 9704285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differences in compression artifacts on thin- and thick-section lung CT images. Bajpai V; Lee KH; Kim B; Kim KJ; Kim TJ; Kim YH; Kang HS AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Aug; 191(2):W38-43. PubMed ID: 18647884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of irreversible image compression on diagnostic accuracy in thoracic imaging. Aberle DR; Gleeson F; Sayre JW; Brown K; Batra P; Young DA; Stewart BK; Ho BK; Huang HK Invest Radiol; 1993 May; 28(5):398-403. PubMed ID: 8496031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. JPEG2000 3D compression vs. 2D compression: an assessment of artifact amount and computing time in compressing thin-section abdomen CT images. Kim B; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Richter T; Kang HS; Kim SY; Kim YH; Seo J Med Phys; 2009 Mar; 36(3):835-44. PubMed ID: 19378744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. JPEG2000 compression of thin-section CT images of the lung: effect of compression ratio on image quality. Ringl H; Schernthaner RE; Bankier AA; Weber M; Prokop M; Herold CJ; Schaefer-Prokop C Radiology; 2006 Sep; 240(3):869-77. PubMed ID: 16868278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of CRT monitor display for personal computer in the detection of small lung nodules: with particular emphasis on comparison between JPEG and wavelet compression]. Kihara Y Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2001 Apr; 61(5):231-7. PubMed ID: 11398347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Artifacts in slab average-intensity-projection images reformatted from JPEG 2000 compressed thin-section abdominal CT data sets. Kim B; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Mantiuk R; Kim HR; Kim YH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jun; 190(6):W342-50. PubMed ID: 18492876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of wavelet and Joint Photographic Experts Group lossy compression methods applied to medical images. Iyriboz TA; Zukoski MJ; Hopper KD; Stagg PL J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):14-7. PubMed ID: 10342156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rank-order polynomial subband decomposition for medical image compression. Grüter R; Egger O; Vesin JM; Kunt M IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2000 Oct; 19(10):1044-52. PubMed ID: 11131494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Joint photographic experts group (JPEG) compatible data compression of mammograms. Good WF; Maitz GS; Gur D J Digit Imaging; 1994 Aug; 7(3):123-32. PubMed ID: 7948171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A segmentation-based lossless image coding method for high-resolution medical image compression. Shen L; Rangayyan RM IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1997 Jun; 16(3):301-7. PubMed ID: 9184892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality of compressed medical images. Shiao YH; Chen TJ; Chuang KS; Lin CH; Chuang CC J Digit Imaging; 2007 Jun; 20(2):149-59. PubMed ID: 17318703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]