493 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10796974)
1. Abortion in the United States: barriers to access.
Fried MG
Health Hum Rights; 2000; 4(2):174-94. PubMed ID: 10796974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implications of the Federal Abortion Ban for Women's Health in the United States.
Weitz TA; Yanow S
Reprod Health Matters; 2008 May; 16(31 Suppl):99-107. PubMed ID: 18772090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. International human rights and women's reproductive health.
Cook RJ
Stud Fam Plann; 1993; 24(2):73-86. PubMed ID: 8511808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. State actions on reproductive health issues in 1994.
Sollom T
Fam Plann Perspect; 1995; 27(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 7796902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Access to safe abortion within the limits of the law.
Rao KA; Faúndes A
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Jun; 20(3):421-32. PubMed ID: 16563871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Abortion patients' perceptions of abortion regulation.
Cockrill K; Weitz TA
Womens Health Issues; 2010; 20(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 20123172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gender, race + geography = jeopardy: marginalized women, human rights and HIV in the United States.
Fried ST; Kelly B
Womens Health Issues; 2011 Nov; 21(6 Suppl):S243-9. PubMed ID: 22055674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Marital secrets. The emerging issue of abortion spousal notification laws.
Shore BD
J Leg Med; 1982 Sep; 3(3):461-82. PubMed ID: 6983551
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. NOW v. Scheidler: protecting women's access to reproductive health services.
Clayton F; Love SN
Albany Law Rev; 1999; 62(3):967-97. PubMed ID: 10558500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The denial of abortion care information, referrals, and services undermines quality care for U.S. women.
Weitz TA; Fogel SB
Womens Health Issues; 2010; 20(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 20123171
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Abortion providers bounce back.
Carney EN
Natl J (Wash); 1996 Jul; 28(29-30):1584-6. PubMed ID: 10159048
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Building coalitions to support women's health and rights in the United States: South Carolina and Florida.
McGovern T
Reprod Health Matters; 2007 May; 15(29):119-29. PubMed ID: 17512383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Incarcerated women and abortion provision: a survey of correctional health providers.
Sufrin CB; Creinin MD; Chang JC
Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2009 Mar; 41(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 19291123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. More family planning and abortion services needed.
Gold R
Plan Parent Rev; 1984; 3(4):5. PubMed ID: 12267090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Abortion-rights groups look to 1998.
Serafini MW
Natl J (Wash); 1998 Jan; 30(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 10176714
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Increase in obstacles to abortion: the American perspective in 2004.
Donohoe M
J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972); 2005; 60(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 16845763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. My body, my consent: securing the constitutional right to abortion funding.
McDonagh EL
Albany Law Rev; 1999; 62(3):1057-1118. PubMed ID: 10558501
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Reproductive health. An ethical perspective.
Rosenfield AG
J Reprod Med; 1994 May; 39(5):337-42. PubMed ID: 8064700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation.
Van Detta JA
South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. State abortion policy, geographic access to abortion providers and changing family formation.
Lichter DT; McLaughlin DK; Ribar DC
Fam Plann Perspect; 1998; 30(6):281-7. PubMed ID: 9859019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
