BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

527 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10798802)

  • 1. Brachytherapy in patients with small prostate glands.
    Loblaw DA; Wallner K; Dibiase S; Russell K; Blasko J; Ellis W
    Tech Urol; 2000 Jun; 6(2):64-9. PubMed ID: 10798802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transperineal brachytherapy in patients with large prostate glands.
    Wang H; Wallner K; Sutlief S; Blasko J; Russell K; Ellis W
    Int J Cancer; 2000 Aug; 90(4):199-205. PubMed ID: 10993960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Timing of computed tomography-based postimplant assessment following permanent transperineal prostate brachytherapy.
    Prestidge BR; Bice WS; Kiefer EJ; Prete JJ
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 Mar; 40(5):1111-5. PubMed ID: 9539566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Morbidity effect of the time gap between supplemental beam radiation and Pd-103 prostate brachytherapy.
    Corriveau J; Wallner K; Merrick G; True L; Cavanagh W; Sutlief S; Butler W
    Brachytherapy; 2003; 2(2):108-13. PubMed ID: 15062149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of prostate size and isotope selection on dosimetric quality following permanent seed implantation.
    Merrick GS; Butler WM; Dorsey AT; Lief JH
    Tech Urol; 2001 Sep; 7(3):233-40. PubMed ID: 11575521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A dynamic model for the estimation of optimum timing of computed tomography scan for dose evaluation of 125I or 103Pd seed implant of prostate.
    Yue N; Dicker AP; Corn BW; Nath R; Waterman FM
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Jan; 43(2):447-54. PubMed ID: 10030274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anticipating prostatic volume changes due to prostate brachytherapy.
    Badiozamani KR; Wallner K; Sutlief S; Ellis W; Blasko J; Russell K
    Radiat Oncol Investig; 1999; 7(6):360-4. PubMed ID: 10644059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modification of prostate implants based on postimplant treatment margin assessment.
    Mueller A; Wallner K; Merrick G; Courveau J; Sutlief S; Butler W; Gong L; Cho P
    Med Phys; 2002 Dec; 29(12):2782-7. PubMed ID: 12512711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Isotope selection for patients undergoing prostate brachytherapy.
    Cha CM; Potters L; Ashley R; Freeman K; Wang XH; Waldbaum R; Leibel S
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Sep; 45(2):391-5. PubMed ID: 10487561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prostate seed implantation using 3D-computer assisted intraoperative planning vs. a standard look-up nomogram: Improved target conformality with reduction in urethral and rectal wall dose.
    Raben A; Chen H; Grebler A; Geltzeiler J; Geltzeiler M; Keselman I; Litvin S; Sim S; Hanlon A; Yang J
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Dec; 60(5):1631-8. PubMed ID: 15590195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Urinary morbidity following ultrasound-guided transperineal prostate seed implantation.
    Gelblum DY; Potters L; Ashley R; Waldbaum R; Wang XH; Leibel S
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Aug; 45(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 10477007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of prostatic edema on CT-based postimplant dosimetry.
    Dogan N; Mohideen N; Glasgow GP; Keys K; Flanigan RC
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Jun; 53(2):483-9. PubMed ID: 12023153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimum timing for image-based dose evaluation of 125I and 103PD prostate seed implants.
    Yue N; Chen Z; Peschel R; Dicker AP; Waterman FM; Nath R
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Nov; 45(4):1063-72. PubMed ID: 10571216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correlation between pre- and postimplant dosimetry for iodine-125 seed implants for localized prostate cancer.
    Al-Qaisieh B; Witteveen T; Carey B; Henry A; Bottomley D; Smith J; Franks K; Bownes P
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Oct; 75(2):626-30. PubMed ID: 19540077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical correlates of high intraprostatic brachytherapy dose volumes.
    Jones S; Wallner K; Merrick G; Corriveau J; Sutlief S; True L; Butler W
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Jun; 53(2):328-33. PubMed ID: 12023136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of interobserver variability on transrectal ultrasonography-based postimplant dosimetry.
    Xue J; Waterman F; Handler J; Gressen E
    Brachytherapy; 2006; 5(3):174-82. PubMed ID: 16864069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of timing on the dosimetric analysis of transperineal ultrasound-guided, prostatic conformal brachytherapy.
    Merrick GS; Butler WM; Dorsey AT; Walbert HL
    Radiat Oncol Investig; 1998; 6(4):182-90. PubMed ID: 9727878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of intraoperative dosimetric implant representation with postimplant dosimetry in patients receiving prostate brachytherapy.
    Stone NN; Hong S; Lo YC; Howard V; Stock RG
    Brachytherapy; 2003; 2(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 15062159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is there a role for postimplant dosimetry after real-time dynamic permanent prostate brachytherapy?
    Potters L; Calugaru E; Jassal A; Presser J
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jul; 65(4):1014-9. PubMed ID: 16682144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A nomogram to compensate for intraoperative prostate edema during transperineal brachytherapy.
    Potters L; Wang XH; Yamada Y
    Tech Urol; 2000 Jun; 6(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 10798808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.