295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10799171)
1. Detection rate of histologically insignificant prostate cancer with systematic sextant biopsies and fine needle aspiration cytology.
Hautmann SH; Conrad S; Henke RP; Erbersdobler A; Simon J; Straub M; Graefen M; Hautmann RE; Huland H
J Urol; 2000 Jun; 163(6):1734-8. PubMed ID: 10799171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prediction of tumor significance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer.
Noguchi M; Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Yemoto CM
J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):104-9; discussion 109-10. PubMed ID: 11435833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prostate cancer diagnosis using a saturation needle biopsy technique after previous negative sextant biopsies.
Stewart CS; Leibovich BC; Weaver AL; Lieber MM
J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):86-91; discussion 91-2. PubMed ID: 11435830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Increased detection of clinically significant prostate cancer by additional sampling from the anterior lateral horns of the peripheral zone in combination with the standard sextant biopsy.
Miyake H; Sakai I; Harada K; Hara I; Eto H
Int J Urol; 2004 Jun; 11(6):402-6. PubMed ID: 15157210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relating biopsy and clinical variables to radical prostatectomy findings: can insignificant and advanced prostate cancer be predicted in a screening population?
Anast JW; Andriole GL; Bismar TA; Yan Y; Humphrey PA
Urology; 2004 Sep; 64(3):544-50. PubMed ID: 15351590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Extended 21-sample needle biopsy protocol for diagnosis of prostate cancer in 1000 consecutive patients.
Guichard G; Larré S; Gallina A; Lazar A; Faucon H; Chemama S; Allory Y; Patard JJ; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Yiou R; Salomon L; Abbou CC; de la Taille A
Eur Urol; 2007 Aug; 52(2):430-5. PubMed ID: 17412489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prostate cancers diagnosed at repeat biopsy are smaller and less likely to be high grade.
Tan N; Lane BR; Li J; Moussa AS; Soriano M; Jones JS
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1325-9; discussion 1329. PubMed ID: 18707706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of potentially insignificant prostate cancer in men undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically organ-confined disease.
Miyake H; Sakai I; Harada K; Hara I; Eto H
Int J Urol; 2005 Mar; 12(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 15828954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective evaluation of prostate cancer detected on biopsies 1, 2, 3 and 4: when should we stop?
Djavan B; Ravery V; Zlotta A; Dobronski P; Dobrovits M; Fakhari M; Seitz C; Susani M; Borkowski A; Boccon-Gibod L; Schulman CC; Marberger M
J Urol; 2001 Nov; 166(5):1679-83. PubMed ID: 11586201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimens.
Divrik RT; Eroglu A; Sahin A; Zorlu F; Ozen H
Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 17826653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Micro-focal prostate cancer: a comparison of biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen features.
Boccon-Gibod LM; Dumonceau O; Toublanc M; Ravery V; Boccon-Gibod LA
Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):895-9. PubMed ID: 16125298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. No reason for immediate repeat sextant biopsy after negative initial sextant biopsy in men with PSA level of 4.0 ng/mL or greater (ERSPC, Rotterdam).
Roobol MJ; van der Cruijsen IW; Schröder FH
Urology; 2004 May; 63(5):892-7; discussion 897-9. PubMed ID: 15134973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Features of prostate cancers detected during a prevalence screening round. The Rotterdam experience.
Van der Kwast TH; Postma R; Hoedemaeker RF; van Leenders GJ; Schröder FH
Can J Urol; 2005 Jun; 12 Suppl 2():16-20. PubMed ID: 16018827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of extended pattern technique for initial prostate biopsy.
Siu W; Dunn RL; Shah RB; Wei JT
J Urol; 2005 Aug; 174(2):505-9. PubMed ID: 16006881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prostate biopsy: who, how and when. An update.
Djavan B; Milani S; Remzi M
Can J Urol; 2005 Feb; 12 Suppl 1():44-8; discussion 99-100. PubMed ID: 15780165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Population-based screening for prostate cancer by measuring total serum prostate-specific antigen in Iran.
Hosseini SY; Moharramzadeh M; Ghadian AR; Hooshyar H; Lashay AR; Safarinejad MR
Int J Urol; 2007 May; 14(5):406-11. PubMed ID: 17511722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Indications for preoperative prostate biopsy in patients undergoing radical cystoprostatectomy for bladder cancer.
Thomas C; Wiesner C; Melchior S; Gillitzer R; Schmidt F; Thüroff JW
J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):1938-41; discussion 1941. PubMed ID: 18801501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preoperative prediction of small volume cancer (less than 0.5 ml) in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Cheng L; Poulos CK; Pan CX; Jones TD; Daggy JK; Eble JN; Koch MO
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):898-902. PubMed ID: 16093983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pathological features of prostate cancer detected on initial and repeat prostate biopsy: results of the prospective European Prostate Cancer Detection study.
Djavan B; Mazal P; Zlotta A; Wammack R; Ravery V; Remzi M; Susani M; Borkowski A; Hruby S; Boccon-Gibod L; Schulman CC; Marberger M
Prostate; 2001 May; 47(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 11340633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does increased needle biopsy sampling of the prostate detect a higher number of potentially insignificant tumors?
Chan TY; Chan DY; Stutzman KL; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2181-4. PubMed ID: 11696731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
