BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10802334)

  • 1. Estimation of sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests and disease prevalence when the true disease state is unknown.
    Enøe C; Georgiadis MP; Johnson WO
    Prev Vet Med; 2000 May; 45(1-2):61-81. PubMed ID: 10802334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. "TAGS", a program for the evaluation of test accuracy in the absence of a gold standard.
    Pouillot R; Gerbier G; Gardner IA
    Prev Vet Med; 2002 Feb; 53(1-2):67-81. PubMed ID: 11821138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bayesian versus frequentist methods for estimating true prevalence of disease and diagnostic test performance.
    Sanogo M; Abatih E; Saegerman C
    Vet J; 2014 Nov; 202(2):204-7. PubMed ID: 25172837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bayes and diagnostic testing.
    Lesaffre E; Speybroeck N; Berkvens D
    Vet Parasitol; 2007 Aug; 148(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 17566663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of diagnostic tests in veterinary epidemiologic studies.
    Greiner M; Gardner IA
    Prev Vet Med; 2000 May; 45(1-2):43-59. PubMed ID: 10802333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bayesian estimation of true prevalence, sensitivity and specificity of three diagnostic tests for detection of Escherichia coli O157 in cattle feces.
    Ekong PS; Sanderson MW; Bello NM; Noll LW; Cernicchiaro N; Renter DG; Bai J; Nagaraja TG
    Prev Vet Med; 2017 Dec; 148():21-27. PubMed ID: 29157370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Herd-level interpretation of test results for epidemiologic studies of animal diseases.
    Christensen J; Gardner IA
    Prev Vet Med; 2000 May; 45(1-2):83-106. PubMed ID: 10802335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comments on "Pouillot, R., Gerbier, G., Gardner, I.A., 2002. "TAGS", a program for the evaluation of test accuracy in the absence of a gold standard. Prev. Vet. Med. 53, 67-81".
    Berkvens DL; Speybroeck N; Lesaffre E; Saegerman C
    Prev Vet Med; 2003 Jun; 59(3):181-3; author reply 185-7. PubMed ID: 12809762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Epidemiologic issues in the validation of veterinary diagnostic tests.
    Greiner M; Gardner IA
    Prev Vet Med; 2000 May; 45(1-2):3-22. PubMed ID: 10802331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian latent class analysis when the reference test is imperfect.
    Cheung A; Dufour S; Jones G; Kostoulas P; Stevenson MA; Singanallur NB; Firestone SM
    Rev Sci Tech; 2021 Jun; 40(1):271-286. PubMed ID: 34140724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gold standards are out and Bayes is in: Implementing the cure for imperfect reference tests in diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Johnson WO; Jones G; Gardner IA
    Prev Vet Med; 2019 Jun; 167():113-127. PubMed ID: 31027713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Low accuracy of Bayesian latent class analysis for estimation of herd-level true prevalence under certain disease characteristics-An analysis using simulated data.
    McAloon CG; Doherty ML; Whyte P; Verdugo C; Toft N; More SJ; O'Grady L; Green MJ
    Prev Vet Med; 2019 Jan; 162():117-125. PubMed ID: 30621890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measures of accuracy and performance of diagnostic tests.
    Drobatz KJ
    J Vet Cardiol; 2009 May; 11 Suppl 1():S33-40. PubMed ID: 19451045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using and interpreting diagnostic tests.
    McKenna SL; Dohoo IR
    Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract; 2006 Mar; 22(1):195-205. PubMed ID: 16517302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A general framework for comparative Bayesian meta-analysis of diagnostic studies.
    Menten J; Lesaffre E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Aug; 15():70. PubMed ID: 26315894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of diagnostic test interpretations.
    Atwell R
    Aust Vet J; 2012; 90(1-2):4. PubMed ID: 22256976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Bayesian approach for the evaluation of six diagnostic assays and the estimation of Cryptosporidium prevalence in dairy calves.
    Geurden T; Berkvens D; Geldhof P; Vercruysse J; Claerebout E
    Vet Res; 2006; 37(5):671-82. PubMed ID: 16777038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimating prevalence and diagnostic test characteristics of bovine cysticercosis in Belgium in the absence of a 'gold standard' reference test using a Bayesian approach.
    Jansen F; Dorny P; Gabriël S; Eichenberger RM; Berkvens D
    Vet Parasitol; 2018 Apr; 254():142-146. PubMed ID: 29656999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bias due to composite reference standards in diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Schiller I; van Smeden M; Hadgu A; Libman M; Reitsma JB; Dendukuri N
    Stat Med; 2016 Apr; 35(9):1454-70. PubMed ID: 26555849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. STARD-BLCM: Standards for the Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy studies that use Bayesian Latent Class Models.
    Kostoulas P; Nielsen SS; Branscum AJ; Johnson WO; Dendukuri N; Dhand NK; Toft N; Gardner IA
    Prev Vet Med; 2017 Mar; 138():37-47. PubMed ID: 28237234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.