These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10802334)

  • 21. Bayesian meta-analysis of diagnostic tests allowing for imperfect reference standards.
    Menten J; Boelaert M; Lesaffre E
    Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(30):5398-413. PubMed ID: 24003003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluating diagnostic tests with imperfect standards.
    Valenstein PN
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1990 Feb; 93(2):252-8. PubMed ID: 2405632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Diagnostic test accuracy of nutritional tools used to identify undernutrition in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
    Håkonsen SJ; Pedersen PU; Bath-Hextall F; Kirkpatrick P
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 May; 13(4):141-87. PubMed ID: 26447079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Estimating diagnostic accuracy of multiple binary tests with an imperfect reference standard.
    Albert PS
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(5):780-97. PubMed ID: 19101935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Principles and practical application of the receiver-operating characteristic analysis for diagnostic tests.
    Greiner M; Pfeiffer D; Smith RD
    Prev Vet Med; 2000 May; 45(1-2):23-41. PubMed ID: 10802332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Confidence limits for prevalence of disease adjusted for estimated sensitivity and specificity.
    Lang Z; Reiczigel J
    Prev Vet Med; 2014 Jan; 113(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 24416798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Influence of diagnostic tests for estimating prevalence during surveillance programs].
    Fuchs K; Deutz A; Köfer J; Wagner P
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2000 Sep; 113(9):348-51. PubMed ID: 11042948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The use of imperfect diagnostic tests had an impact on prevalence estimation.
    Ihorst G; Forster J; Petersen G; Werchau H; Rohwedder A; Schumacher M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 60(9):902-10. PubMed ID: 17689806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bayesian estimation of disease prevalence and the parameters of diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard.
    Joseph L; Gyorkos TW; Coupal L
    Am J Epidemiol; 1995 Feb; 141(3):263-72. PubMed ID: 7840100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Estimation of diagnostic-test sensitivity and specificity through Bayesian modeling.
    Branscum AJ; Gardner IA; Johnson WO
    Prev Vet Med; 2005 May; 68(2-4):145-63. PubMed ID: 15820113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Practical and effective diagnosis of animal anthrax in endemic low-resource settings.
    Aminu OR; Lembo T; Zadoks RN; Biek R; Lewis S; Kiwelu I; Mmbaga BT; Mshanga D; Shirima G; Denwood M; Forde TL
    PLoS Negl Trop Dis; 2020 Sep; 14(9):e0008655. PubMed ID: 32925904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. How to Determine the Accuracy of an Alternative Diagnostic Test when It Is Actually Better than the Reference Tests: A Re-Evaluation of Diagnostic Tests for Scrub Typhus Using Bayesian LCMs.
    Lim C; Paris DH; Blacksell SD; Laongnualpanich A; Kantipong P; Chierakul W; Wuthiekanun V; Day NP; Cooper BS; Limmathurotsakul D
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0114930. PubMed ID: 26024375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bayesian latent class models with conditionally dependent diagnostic tests: a case study.
    Menten J; Boelaert M; Lesaffre E
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4469-88. PubMed ID: 18551515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Estimation of diagnostic test accuracy without full verification: a review of latent class methods.
    Collins J; Huynh M
    Stat Med; 2014 Oct; 33(24):4141-69. PubMed ID: 24910172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Estimating receiver operating characteristic curves with covariates when there is no perfect reference test for diagnosis of Johne's disease.
    Wang C; Turnbull BW; Gröhn YT; Nielsen SS
    J Dairy Sci; 2006 Aug; 89(8):3038-46. PubMed ID: 16840620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Bias in discrepant analysis: when two wrongs don't make a right.
    Miller WC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1998 Mar; 51(3):219-31. PubMed ID: 9495687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Inferences for likelihood ratios in the absence of a "gold standard".
    Joseph L; Gyorkos TW
    Med Decis Making; 1996; 16(4):412-7. PubMed ID: 8912303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessing the convergence of Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods: an example from evaluation of diagnostic tests in absence of a gold standard.
    Toft N; Innocent GT; Gettinby G; Reid SW
    Prev Vet Med; 2007 May; 79(2-4):244-56. PubMed ID: 17292499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of dependent errors in the assessment of diagnostic or screening test accuracy when the reference standard is imperfect.
    Walter SD; Macaskill P; Lord SJ; Irwig L
    Stat Med; 2012 May; 31(11-12):1129-38. PubMed ID: 22351623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Bayesian evaluation of clinical diagnostic test characteristics of visual observations and remote monitoring to diagnose bovine respiratory disease in beef calves.
    White BJ; Goehl DR; Amrine DE; Booker C; Wildman B; Perrett T
    Prev Vet Med; 2016 Apr; 126():74-80. PubMed ID: 26879058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.