These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

405 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10802605)

  • 21. Attention, class: a departing NAS president speaks his mind. Interview by Jeffrey Mervis.
    Alberts B
    Science; 2005 May; 308(5725):1108. PubMed ID: 15905380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. NAS-NRC Twin Registry 1995 survey.
    Page WF
    Am J Med Genet; 1994 Aug; 52(2):254. PubMed ID: 7802027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Recommended stardard procedures for the clinical measurement and specification of visual acuity. Report of working group 39. Committee on vision. Assembly of Behavioral and Social Sciences, National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C.
    Adv Ophthalmol; 1980; 41():103-48. PubMed ID: 7001873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Genomics. DOE hits potholes on the road to systems biology.
    Pennisi E
    Science; 2006 Mar; 311(5765):1226. PubMed ID: 16513950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. NAS issues mixed message on unintended effects of GM food.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Sep; 22(9):1062. PubMed ID: 15340456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. U.S. science policy. Obama courts a smitten audience at the national academy.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2009 May; 324(5927):576-7. PubMed ID: 19407168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Endangered species. NRC backs ecosystem-wide changes to save Klamath fish.
    Service RF
    Science; 2003 Oct; 302(5646):765. PubMed ID: 14593141
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. National Academy of Sciences enters controversy on relevance of animal toxicologic studies.
    Environ Health Perspect; 1993 Apr; 101(1):19. PubMed ID: 8513757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The real curse of Frankenfood.
    Miller HI
    Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Feb; 17(2):113. PubMed ID: 10052332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Joint effort: NRC wants teamwork for home-health regs.
    Conn J
    Mod Healthc; 2011 Jul; 41(30):12-3. PubMed ID: 22533269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Stem cell protocols: the NAS guidelines are a useful start.
    Johnston J
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(6):16-7. PubMed ID: 16396200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Scientific community. U.S. science academy elects new members.
    Science; 2002 May; 296(5570):1001-2. PubMed ID: 12004095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. USDA scrutinizes GM organism regulations.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Mar; 22(3):254-5. PubMed ID: 14990936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Will we reap what biopharming sows?
    Miller HI
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 May; 21(5):480-1. PubMed ID: 12721561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. National Academy calls for sea change in ocean efforts.
    Mason B
    Nature; 2003 Nov; 426(6962):6. PubMed ID: 14603278
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Beyond the human neuron mouse to the NAS Guidelines.
    Cohen CB
    Am J Bioeth; 2007 May; 7(5):46-9. PubMed ID: 17497504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Ecology. 'Combat biology' on the Klamath.
    Service RF
    Science; 2003 Apr; 300(5616):36-9. PubMed ID: 12677035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Stem cell politics: the NAS prohibitions pack more bark than bite.
    Robert JS; Baylis F
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(6):15-6. PubMed ID: 16396199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. US-Indian agbiotech deal under scrutiny.
    Jayaraman KS
    Nat Biotechnol; 2006 May; 24(5):481. PubMed ID: 16680115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The public-private structure of intellectual property ownership in agricultural biotechnology.
    Graff GD; Cullen SE; Bradford KJ; Zilberman D; Bennett AB
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Sep; 21(9):989-95. PubMed ID: 12949559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.