These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10803114)

  • 1. An evaluation of root canal preparation with the automated Excalibur endodontic handpiece.
    Hülsmann M; Gambal A; Bahr R
    Clin Oral Investig; 1999 Jun; 3(2):70-8. PubMed ID: 10803114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparative study of root canal preparation using Profile .04 and Lightspeed rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Versümer J; Hülsmann M; Schäfers F
    Int Endod J; 2002 Jan; 35(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 11853237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An in vitro comparison of the Excalibur handpiece and hand instrumentation in curved root canals.
    Cheung GS; Chan AW
    J Endod; 1996 Mar; 22(3):131-4. PubMed ID: 8618094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative study of root-canal preparation using Lightspeed and Quantec SC rotary NiTi instruments.
    Hülsmann M; Herbst U; Schäfers F
    Int Endod J; 2003 Nov; 36(11):748-56. PubMed ID: 14641438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Jodway B; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative study of root canal preparation with HERO 642 and Quantec SC rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Hülsmann M; Schade M; Schäfers F
    Int Endod J; 2001 Oct; 34(7):538-46. PubMed ID: 11601772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative study of root canal preparation using FlexMaster and HERO 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Hülsmann M; Gressmann G; Schäfers F
    Int Endod J; 2003 May; 36(5):358-66. PubMed ID: 12752650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Paqué F; Musch U; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jan; 38(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 15606817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Schlingemann R
    Int Endod J; 2003 Mar; 36(3):208-17. PubMed ID: 12657147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative study of seven instruments in shaping the root canal in vitro.
    Nagy CD; Bartha K; Bernáth M; Verdes E; Szabó J
    Int Endod J; 1997 Mar; 30(2):124-32. PubMed ID: 10332246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile--Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and instrumentation results in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Lohmann D
    Int Endod J; 2002 Jun; 35(6):514-21. PubMed ID: 12190908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative study of six rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation.
    Guelzow A; Stamm O; Martus P; Kielbassa AM
    Int Endod J; 2005 Oct; 38(10):743-52. PubMed ID: 16164689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of different types of automated devices on the shaping ability of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments.
    Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
    Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):627-36. PubMed ID: 16104976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Root canal cleanliness after preparation with different endodontic handpieces and hand instruments: a comparative SEM investigation.
    Hülsmann M; Rümmelin C; Schäfers F
    J Endod; 1997 May; 23(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 9545932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness in cleaning oval-shaped root canals using Anatomic Endodontic Technology, ProFile and manual instrumentation: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Banegas G
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):356-63. PubMed ID: 15910470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper.
    Bürklein S; Hinschitza K; Dammaschke T; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):449-61. PubMed ID: 22188401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparative evaluation of different instruments for root canal preparation tested on extracted human teeth III. Study of sonic and ultrasonic instruments].
    Dobó NC; Bartha K; Bernáth M; Szabó J
    Fogorv Sz; 1996 Mar; 89(3):75-84. PubMed ID: 8620978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of various automated devices on the shaping ability of Mtwo rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
    Bürklein S; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2006 Dec; 39(12):945-51. PubMed ID: 17107539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of root canal preparation with two rotary NiTi instruments: ProFile .04 and GT Rotary.
    Rödig T; Hülsmann M; Kahlmeier C
    Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):553-62. PubMed ID: 17511784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.