These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10803114)

  • 21. Smear layer production of K3 and ProFile Ni-Ti rotary instruments in curved root canals: a comparative SEM study.
    Kum KY; Kazemi RB; Cha BY; Zhu Q
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):536-41. PubMed ID: 16545720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Quality of preparation of oval distal root canals in mandibular molars using nickel-titanium instruments.
    Rödig T; Hülsmann M; Mühge M; Schäfers F
    Int Endod J; 2002 Nov; 35(11):919-28. PubMed ID: 12453021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cleaning and shaping curved root canals: Mtwo vs ProTaper instruments, a lab comparison.
    Kuzekanani M; Walsh LJ; Yousefi MA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(3):268-70. PubMed ID: 19884706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of two endodontic handpieces during the preparation of simulated root canals.
    Smith RB; Edmunds DH
    Int Endod J; 1997 Nov; 30(6):369-80. PubMed ID: 9588976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Ex vivo study on root canal instrumentation of two rotary nickel-titanium systems in comparison to stainless steel hand instruments.
    Vaudt J; Bitter K; Neumann K; Kielbassa AM
    Int Endod J; 2009 Jan; 42(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 19125977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of root canal morphology on canal shape following instrumentation using different techniques.
    Nagy CD; Bartha K; Bernáth M; Verdes E; Szabó J
    Int Endod J; 1997 Mar; 30(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 10332247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Root canal shaping using rotary nickel-titanium files in preclinical dental education in Turkey.
    Ünal GÇ; Maden M; Orhan EO; Sarıtekin E; Teke A
    J Dent Educ; 2012 Apr; 76(4):509-13. PubMed ID: 22473564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cleaning efficacy using two engine-driven systems versus manual instrumentation in curved root canals: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Alvarez Serrano S; Hernandez SR
    J Endod; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1279-82. PubMed ID: 21846548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An in vivo evaluation of two types of files used to accurately determine the diameter of the apical constriction of a root canal: an in vivo study.
    Darda S; Manwar N; Chandak M; Shori DD
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Jul; 10(4):43-50. PubMed ID: 19575053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of root canal preparation using different automated devices and hand instrumentation.
    Hülsmann M; Stryga F
    J Endod; 1993 Mar; 19(3):141-5. PubMed ID: 8509753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Shaping ability of progressive versus constant taper instruments in simulated root canals.
    Yang GB; Zhou XD; Zhang H; Wu HK
    Int Endod J; 2006 Oct; 39(10):791-9. PubMed ID: 16948665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
    Tan BT; Messer HH
    J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An analysis of canal centering using mechanical instrumentation techniques.
    Kosa DA; Marshall G; Baumgartner JC
    J Endod; 1999 Jun; 25(6):441-5. PubMed ID: 10530247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cleaning efficiency of anatomic endodontic technology, ProFile System and Manual Instrumentation in oval-shaped root canals: an in vitro study.
    Reddy ES; Sainath D; Narenderreddy M; Pasari S; Vallikanthan S; Sindhurareddy G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jul; 14(4):629-34. PubMed ID: 24309340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Performance of RaCe instrumentation system in curved root canals: a comprehensive analysis by three study methods.
    Leonardi DP; Sydney GB; Tanomaru MF; Baratto-Filho F; Baratto SS; Cerri PS
    Braz Dent J; 2013; 24(3):230-4. PubMed ID: 23969911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of three techniques for preparing oval-shaped root canals.
    Taha NA; Ozawa T; Messer HH
    J Endod; 2010 Mar; 36(3):532-5. PubMed ID: 20171378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of WaveOne, Reciproc and OneShape single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Saber SE; Nagy MM; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2015 Jan; 48(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 24673737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Shaping ability of progressive versus constant taper instruments in curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Yang GB; Zhou XD; Zheng YL; Zhang H; Shu Y; Wu HK
    Int Endod J; 2007 Sep; 40(9):707-14. PubMed ID: 17645514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals.
    Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
    Int Endod J; 2006 Mar; 39(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 16507073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of preparation of curved root canals with Hyflex CM and Revo-S rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
    Bürklein S; Börjes L; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2014 May; 47(5):470-6. PubMed ID: 23998461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.