These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10803143)

  • 1. The standardized-taper root canal preparation, Part 2: GT file selection and safe handpiece-driven file use.
    Buchanan LS
    Dent Today; 1999 Oct; 18(10):68-70, 72-6. PubMed ID: 10803143
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [In vitro comparison of root canal preparation with step-back technique and GT rotary file--a nickel-titanium engine driven rotary instrument system].
    Krajczár K; Tóth V; Nyárády Z; Szabó G
    Fogorv Sz; 2005 Jun; 98(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 16108416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison between a hand stainless-steel K file and a rotary NiTi 0.04 taper.
    Namazikhah MS; Mokhlis HR; Alasmakh K
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2000 Jun; 28(6):421-6. PubMed ID: 11324127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stress analysis of human tooth root using various root canal instruments.
    Mayhew JT; Eleazer PD; Hnat WP
    J Endod; 2000 Sep; 26(9):523-4. PubMed ID: 11199793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shaping root canals, Part V: GT File technique in small-root canals.
    Buchanan LS
    Dent Today; 2000 Jan; 19(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 12523241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shaping root canals, Part 4. GT File technique in large root canals with large apical diameters.
    Buchanan LS
    Dent Today; 1999 Dec; 18(12):64-6, 68-9. PubMed ID: 10803154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Shaping root canals, Part 3. Large-root canals with small coronal and apical diameters.
    Buchanan LS
    Dent Today; 1999 Nov; 18(11):76-9. PubMed ID: 10803164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of removal times of Thermafil plastic obturators using ProFile rotary instruments at different rotational speeds in moderately curved canals.
    Royzenblat A; Goodell GG
    J Endod; 2007 Mar; 33(3):256-8. PubMed ID: 17320708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shaping root canals, Part VI: GT File technique in abruptly curved canals.
    Buchanan LS
    Dent Today; 2000 Feb; 19(2):66-71, 166. PubMed ID: 15027289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cutting ability of Heliosonic, Rispisonic, and Shaper files.
    Lumley PJ
    J Endod; 1997 Apr; 23(4):221-4. PubMed ID: 9594769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of electronic apex locater-controlled handpieces.
    Barthelemy J; Gregor L; Krejci I; Wataha J; Bouillaguet S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Mar; 107(3):437-41. PubMed ID: 19168373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation to remove artificially placed dentine debris from human root canals prepared using instruments of varying taper.
    van der Sluis LW; Wu MK; Wesselink PR
    Int Endod J; 2005 Oct; 38(10):764-8. PubMed ID: 16164691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of three nickel titanium rotary systems, EndoSequence, ProTaper universal, and profile GT, for canal-cleaning ability.
    Williamson AE; Sandor AJ; Justman BC
    J Endod; 2009 Jan; 35(1):107-9. PubMed ID: 19084136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shaping ability of progressive versus constant taper instruments in simulated root canals.
    Yang GB; Zhou XD; Zhang H; Wu HK
    Int Endod J; 2006 Oct; 39(10):791-9. PubMed ID: 16948665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of nickel-titanium file distortion using electric and air-driven handpieces.
    Bortnick KL; Steiman HR; Ruskin A
    J Endod; 2001 Jan; 27(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 11487167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of operational speed on the fracture of nickel-titanium rotary instruments.
    Kitchens GG; Liewehr FR; Moon PC
    J Endod; 2007 Jan; 33(1):52-4. PubMed ID: 17185131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of instrument-centering ability within the root canal for three contemporary instrumentation techniques.
    Song YL; Bian Z; Fan B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Peng B
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 15056353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An in vitro comparison of torsional stress and cyclic fatigue resistance of ProFile GT and ProFile GT Series X rotary nickel-titanium files.
    Kramkowski TR; Bahcall J
    J Endod; 2009 Mar; 35(3):404-7. PubMed ID: 19249605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of different types of automated devices on the shaping ability of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments.
    Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
    Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):627-36. PubMed ID: 16104976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of root canal preparation with two rotary NiTi instruments: ProFile .04 and GT Rotary.
    Rödig T; Hülsmann M; Kahlmeier C
    Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):553-62. PubMed ID: 17511784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.