398 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10804483)
21. Value of colposcopy in the early diagnosis of cervical cancer in patients with abnormal pap smears at Shahid Sadoughi hospital, Yazd.
Karimi Zarchi M; Binesh F; Kazemi Z; Teimoori S; Soltani HR; Chiti Z
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(12):3439-41. PubMed ID: 22471494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Treatment of cervical dysplasia with large loop excision of the transformation zone: is endocervical curettage necessary?
Naumann RW; Crispens MA; Alvarez RD; Partridge EE; Shingleton HM; Kilgore LC
South Med J; 1996 Oct; 89(10):961-5. PubMed ID: 8865787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Utility of Endocervical Sampling at Time of Colposcopy when Referral Cytology Is Low Grade or Better.
Pierson RC; Johnson BE; Voirol JR; Kasper KM
Reprod Sci; 2020 Jan; 27(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 32046412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. P16(INK4a) immunocytochemistry in liquid-based cytology samples in equivocal Pap smears: added value in management of women with equivocal Pap smear.
Monsonego J; Pollini G; Evrard MJ; Sednaoui P; Monfort L; Quinzat D; Dachez R; Syrjänen K
Acta Cytol; 2007; 51(5):755-66. PubMed ID: 17910346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. To ECC or not to ECC: the question remains.
Driggers RW; Zahn CM
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2008 Dec; 35(4):583-97; viii. PubMed ID: 19061818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Presence of 10 transformation zone cells in endocervical curettage should not be required for adequacy.
Alqabbani R; Chan J; Goldberg A
Am J Clin Pathol; 2024 Apr; 161(4):369-373. PubMed ID: 38035727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Role of endocervical curettage in colposcopy.
Hatch KD; Shingleton HM; Orr JW; Gore H; Soong SJ
Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Mar; 65(3):403-8. PubMed ID: 3974966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Human papillomavirus testing as triage for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: sensitivity, specificity, and cost-effectiveness.
Kaufman RH; Adam E; Icenogle J; Reeves WC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Oct; 177(4):930-6. PubMed ID: 9369847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ-from Papanicolaou test to hysterectomy: a series of 74 cases.
Lashmanova N; Braun A; Cheng L; Gattuso P; Yan L
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2022; 11(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 34509373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Value of endocervical curettage in follow-up for patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia stage 2+ after loop electrosurgical excision.
Cao D; Shen K; Chen Y; Xu Y; Wu D
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Sep; 158(3):584-589. PubMed ID: 32586604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cytology at the time of cervical colposcopy.
Tapisiz OL; Ertan K; Tyner J; Borahay M; Freeman DH; Kilic GS
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2013; 34(1):36-8. PubMed ID: 23589997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Impact of a Modified HistoGel Method for Processing Endocervical Curettage Specimens on Diagnostic Yield.
Ramia de Cap M; Jou D; Chen Y; Hecht JL; VanderLaan PA; Chen AL
Am J Clin Pathol; 2021 Jan; 155(1):141-147. PubMed ID: 33009570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. 'See and treat' electrosurgical loop excision of the cervical transformation zone.
Ferris DG; Hainer BL; Pfenninger JL; Zuber TJ
J Fam Pract; 1996 Mar; 42(3):253-7. PubMed ID: 8636676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The significance of positive margins in loop electrosurgical cone biopsies.
Felix JC; Muderspach LI; Duggan BD; Roman LD
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Dec; 84(6):996-1000. PubMed ID: 7970484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Clinical significance of endocervical curettage (ECC) in predicting neoplastic lesions of the cervix].
Toki T; Fujii S; Yajima A
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Mar; 46(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 8133138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A retrospective analysis on 1901 women with high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by colposcopic biopsy.
Zhang X; Dou Y; Wang M; Li Y; Wang F; Xie X; Wang X
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Oct; 217():53-58. PubMed ID: 28850822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Atypical squamous cells and low squamous intraepithelial lesions in postmenopausal women: implications for management.
Piccoli R; Mandato VD; Lavitola G; Acunzo G; Bifulco G; Tommaselli GA; Attianese W; Nappi C
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Oct; 140(2):269-74. PubMed ID: 18603346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of the cervical canal with the endocervical brush.
Hoffman MS; Sterghos S; Gordy LW; Gunasekaran S; Cavanagh D
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 82(4 Pt 1):573-7. PubMed ID: 8377985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Contribution of endocervical curettage in evaluating abnormal cervical cytology.
Drescher CW; Peters WA; Roberts JA
Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Sep; 62(3):343-7. PubMed ID: 6877690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Reliability of endocervical curettage after conservative treatment of intraepithelial neoplasia of the cervix].
Lecointre L; Akladios CY; Averous G; Lefebvre F; Baulon E; Thoma V; Fender M; Baldauf JJ
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2015 Feb; 44(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 24485807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
