These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10804707)
1. Execution of people with mental retardation: a violation of National and Customary International Law. Edwards WJ Ment Retard; 2000 Apr; 38(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 10804707 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Toward a uniform standard for mental retardation in death penalty cases. Coleman P; Shellow RA Ment Retard; 2003 Jun; 41(3):203-4. PubMed ID: 12737614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Cruelty to the mentally ill: an Eighth Amendment challenge to the abolition of the insanity defense. LeBlanc SM Am Univ Law Rev; 2007 Jun; 56(5):1281-328. PubMed ID: 17632959 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Capital punishment and offenders with mental retardation: response to the Penry brief. Calnen T; Blackman LS Am J Ment Retard; 1992 May; 96(6):557-64; discussion 565-75. PubMed ID: 1344935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mental retardation and sentences for murder: comparison of two recent court cases. Olvera DR; Dever RB; Earnest MA Ment Retard; 2000 Jun; 38(3):228-33. PubMed ID: 10900930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A joint statement: Stop the execution of persons with mental retardation. Perske R Ment Retard; 2001 Aug; 39(4):327-8. PubMed ID: 11448255 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A National Survey of State Legislation defining mental retardation: implications for policy and practice after Atkins. DeMatteo D; Marczyk G; Pich M Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(6):781-802. PubMed ID: 18046743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Penry revisited: is execution of a person who has mental retardation cruel and unusual? Herbert PB; Young KA J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(2):282-6. PubMed ID: 12108566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The American Psychiatric Association's resource document on mental retardation and capital sentencing: implementing Atkins v. Virginia. Bonnie RJ J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(3):304-8. PubMed ID: 15515919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. International human rights law and mental disability. Gostin LO Hastings Cent Rep; 2004; 34(2):11-2. PubMed ID: 15156831 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. US Supreme Court rules that execution of defendants with mental retardation is unconstitutional. Regan J; Alderson A Tenn Med; 2002 Sep; 95(9):379-81. PubMed ID: 12222149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Mitigating mental retardation in capital cases: finding the "invisible" defendant. Keyes DW; Edwards WJ; Derning TJ Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1998; 22(4):529-39. PubMed ID: 9745243 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. "Synthetic sanity": the ethics and legality of using psychotropic medications to render death row inmates competent for execution. Daugherty KM J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2001; 17(2):715-35. PubMed ID: 11475573 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Observations of a water boy. Perske R Ment Retard; 2003 Feb; 41(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 12597725 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. People with mental retardation are dying, legally. Keyes D; Edwards W; Perske R Ment Retard; 1997 Feb; 35(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 9046787 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Mental illness and the death penalty. Slobogin C Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 2000; 24(4):667-77. PubMed ID: 10986859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Commentary: Atkins on a diet--a fit but lean guide for policy-makers. Fitch WL J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(3):314-6. PubMed ID: 15515921 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The death penalty for drugs is a violation of international human rights law; efficacy--whether real or imagined--provides no excuse. Lines R Addiction; 2009 Dec; 104(12):2119. PubMed ID: 19922578 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]