These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

538 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10805823)

  • 41. Predictors of stroke in patients paced for sick sinus syndrome.
    Greenspon AJ; Hart RG; Dawson D; Hellkamp AS; Silver M; Flaker GC; Schron E; Goldman L; Lee KL; Lamas GA;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 May; 43(9):1617-22. PubMed ID: 15120821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Electrophysiological determinants of atrial fibrillation in sinus node dysfunction despite atrial pacing.
    De Sisti A; Attuel P; Manot S; Fiorello P; Halimi F; Leclercq JF
    Europace; 2000 Oct; 2(4):304-11. PubMed ID: 11194597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The role of pacemaker therapy in the prevention of atrial fibrillation.
    Delfaut P; Prakash A; Giorgberidze I; Munsif AN; Mathew PP; Krol RB; Saksena S
    Semin Interv Cardiol; 1997 Dec; 2(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 9704356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparison of atrial and VVI pacing modes in symptomatic sinus node dysfunction without associated tachyarrhythmias.
    Sethi KK; Bajaj V; Mohan JC; Arora R; Khalilullah M
    Indian Heart J; 1990; 42(3):143-7. PubMed ID: 2258196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The DAVID (Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator) II trial.
    Wilkoff BL; Kudenchuk PJ; Buxton AE; Sharma A; Cook JR; Bhandari AK; Biehl M; Tomassoni G; Leonen A; Klevan LR; Hallstrom AP;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Mar; 53(10):872-80. PubMed ID: 19264245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Predictors and clinical impact of atrial fibrillation after pacemaker implantation in elderly patients treated with dual chamber versus ventricular pacing.
    Stambler BS; Ellenbogen KA; Orav EJ; Sgarbossa EB; Estes NA; Rizo-Patron C; Kirchhoffer JB; Hadjis TA; Goldman L; Lamas GA;
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2003 Oct; 26(10):2000-7. PubMed ID: 14516342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The influence of atrial and ventricular pacing on the incidence of atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis.
    Elkayam LU; Koehler JL; Sheldon TJ; Glotzer TV; Rosenthal LS; Lamas GA
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2011 Dec; 34(12):1593-9. PubMed ID: 21819434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evolutionary innovations in cardiac pacing.
    Cheng A; Tereshchenko LG
    J Electrocardiol; 2011; 44(6):611-5. PubMed ID: 21920533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effects of enhanced pacing modalities on health care resource utilization and costs in bradycardia patients: An analysis of the randomized MINERVA trial.
    Boriani G; Manolis AS; Tukkie R; Mont L; Pürerfellner H; Santini M; Inama G; Serra P; Gulizia M; Samoilenko IV; Wolff C; Holbrook R; Gavazza F; Padeletti L;
    Heart Rhythm; 2015 Jun; 12(6):1192-200. PubMed ID: 25701774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Relationship between pacemaker dependency and the effect of pacing mode on cardiovascular outcomes.
    Tang AS; Roberts RS; Kerr C; Gillis AM; Green MS; Talajic M; Yusuf S; Abdollah H; Gent M; Connolly SJ
    Circulation; 2001 Jun; 103(25):3081-5. PubMed ID: 11425772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Prevention of syncope through permanent cardiac pacing in patients with bifascicular block and syncope of unexplained origin: the PRESS study.
    Santini M; Castro A; Giada F; Ricci R; Inama G; Gaggioli G; Calò L; Orazi S; Viscusi M; Chiodi L; Bartoletti A; Foglia-Manzillo G; Ammirati F; Loricchio ML; Pedrinazzi C; Turreni F; Gasparini G; Accardi F; Raciti G; Raviele A
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2013 Feb; 6(1):101-7. PubMed ID: 23390123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Impact of Physiologic Pacing Versus Right Ventricular Pacing Among Patients With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Greater Than 35%: A Systematic Review for the 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.
    Slotwiner DJ; Raitt MH; Del-Carpio Munoz F; Mulpuru SK; Nasser N; Peterson PN
    Circulation; 2019 Aug; 140(8):e483-e503. PubMed ID: 30586773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Dual-chamber pacemakers for treating symptomatic bradycardia due to sick sinus syndrome without atrioventricular block: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Edwards SJ; Karner C; Trevor N; Wakefield V; Salih F
    Health Technol Assess; 2015 Aug; 19(65):1-210. PubMed ID: 26293406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Atrial antitachycardia pacing and managed ventricular pacing in bradycardia patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial tachyarrhythmias: the MINERVA randomized multicentre international trial.
    Boriani G; Tukkie R; Manolis AS; Mont L; Pürerfellner H; Santini M; Inama G; Serra P; de Sousa J; Botto GL; Mangoni L; Grammatico A; Padeletti L;
    Eur Heart J; 2014 Sep; 35(35):2352-62. PubMed ID: 24771721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Impact of Physiologic Pacing Versus Right Ventricular Pacing Among Patients With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Greater Than 35%: A Systematic Review for the 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.
    Slotwiner DJ; Raitt MH; Del-Carpio Munoz F; Mulpuru SK; Nasser N; Peterson PN
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2019 Aug; 74(7):988-1008. PubMed ID: 30412708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Managed ventricular pacing compared with conventional dual-chamber pacing for elective replacement in chronically paced patients: results of the Prefer for Elective Replacement Managed Ventricular Pacing randomized study.
    Botto GL; Ricci RP; Bénézet JM; Nielsen JC; De Roy L; Piot O; Quesada A; Quaglione R; Vaccari D; Garutti C; Vainer L; Kozák M;
    Heart Rhythm; 2014 Jun; 11(6):992-1000. PubMed ID: 24418164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Outcome of patients aged over 75 years who received a pacemaker to treat sinus node dysfunction.
    Steinbach M; Douchet MP; Bakouboula B; Bronner F; Chauvin M
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2011 Feb; 104(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 21402343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Ischemic Stroke with Cardiac Pacemaker Implantation: Comparison of Physiological and Ventricular Pacing Modes.
    Kato Y; Hayashi T; Kato R; Tanahashi N; Takao M
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2017 Sep; 26(9):1948-1952. PubMed ID: 28709743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Cardiovascular outcomes with atrial-based pacing compared with ventricular pacing: meta-analysis of randomized trials, using individual patient data.
    Healey JS; Toff WD; Lamas GA; Andersen HR; Thorpe KE; Ellenbogen KA; Lee KL; Skene AM; Schron EB; Skehan JD; Goldman L; Roberts RS; Camm AJ; Yusuf S; Connolly SJ
    Circulation; 2006 Jul; 114(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 16801463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Prevalence of atrial fibrillation and stroke in paced patients without prior atrial fibrillation: a prospective study.
    Mattioli AV; Castellani ET; Vivoli D; Sgura FA; Mattioli G
    Clin Cardiol; 1998 Feb; 21(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 9491951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.