131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10805987)
1. Uncertainty of the hazardous concentration and fraction affected for normal species sensitivity distributions.
Aldenberg T; Jaworska JS
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2000 May; 46(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 10805987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. On the application of loss functions in determining assessment factors for ecological risk.
Hickey GL; Craig PS; Hart A
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2009 Feb; 72(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 18691758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Confidence limits for hazardous concentrations based on logistically distributed NOEC toxicity data.
Aldenberg T; Slob W
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 1993 Feb; 25(1):48-63. PubMed ID: 7682918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Methods for deriving pesticide aquatic life criteria.
TenBrook PL; Tjeerdema RS; Hann P; Karkoski J
Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2009; 199():19-109. PubMed ID: 19110939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Bayesian approach for determining the no effect concentration and hazardous concentration in ecotoxicology.
Fox DR
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2010 Feb; 73(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 19836077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bootstrap estimation of benchmark doses and confidence limits with clustered quantal data.
Zhu Y; Wang T; Jelsovsky JZ
Risk Anal; 2007 Apr; 27(2):447-65. PubMed ID: 17511711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantification of variability and uncertainty for censored data sets and application to air toxic emission factors.
Zhao Y; Frey HC
Risk Anal; 2004 Aug; 24(4):1019-34. PubMed ID: 15357825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Critical analysis of methods for assessment of predicted no-effect concentration.
Roman G; Isnard P; Jouany J
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 1999 Jun; 43(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 10375413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A probabilistic effect assessment model for hazardous substances at the workplace.
Schneider K; Schuhmacher-Wolz U; Hassauer M; Darschnik S; Elmshäuser E; Mosbach-Schulz O
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Mar; 44(2):172-81. PubMed ID: 16356615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Towards quantitative uncertainty assessment for cancer risks: central estimates and probability distributions of risk in dose-response modeling.
Kopylev L; Chen C; White P
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Dec; 49(3):203-7. PubMed ID: 17905499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Particulate matter and manganese exposures in Indianapolis, Indiana.
Pellizzari ED; Clayton CA; Rodes CE; Mason RE; Piper LL; Fort B; Pfeifer G; Lynam D
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2001; 11(6):423-40. PubMed ID: 11791160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A procedure for developing risk-based reference doses.
Gaylor DW; Kodell RL
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2002 Apr; 35(2 Pt 1):137-41. PubMed ID: 12051999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Update of potency factors for asbestos-related lung cancer and mesothelioma.
Berman DW; Crump KS
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2008; 38 Suppl 1():1-47. PubMed ID: 18671157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. NTP technical report on the toxicity studies of Dibutyl Phthalate (CAS No. 84-74-2) Administered in Feed to F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice.
Marsman D
Toxic Rep Ser; 1995 Apr; 30():1-G5. PubMed ID: 12209194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relationship of lead, mercury, mirex, dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene, hexachlorobenzene, and polychlorinated biphenyls to timing of menarche among Akwesasne Mohawk girls.
Denham M; Schell LM; Deane G; Gallo MV; Ravenscroft J; DeCaprio AP;
Pediatrics; 2005 Feb; 115(2):e127-34. PubMed ID: 15653789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A meta-analysis of asbestos-related cancer risk that addresses fiber size and mineral type.
Berman DW; Crump KS
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2008; 38 Suppl 1():49-73. PubMed ID: 18686078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. QMRA and decision-making: are we handling measurement errors associated with pathogen concentration data correctly?
Schmidt PJ; Emelko MB
Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(2):427-38. PubMed ID: 20851444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Probabilistic dose-response modeling: case study using dichloromethane PBPK model results.
Marino DJ; Starr TB
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Dec; 49(3):285-300. PubMed ID: 17949874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
