BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10806454)

  • 1. Using intraindividual variability to detect malingering in cognitive performance.
    Strauss E; Hultsch DF; Hunter M; Slick DJ; Patry B; Levy-Bencheton J
    Clin Neuropsychol; 1999 Nov; 13(4):420-32. PubMed ID: 10806454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How well do standard clinical neuropsychological tests identify malingering? A preliminary analysis.
    van Gorp WG; Humphrey LA; Kalechstein AL; Brumm VL; McMullen WJ; Stoddard MA; Pachana NA
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1999 Apr; 21(2):245-50. PubMed ID: 10425521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Head injury and the ability to feign neuropsychological deficits.
    Vickery CD; Berry DT; Dearth CS; Vagnini VL; Baser RE; Cragar DE; Orey SA
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2004 Jan; 19(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 14670378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intraindividual variability as an indicator of malingering in head injury.
    Strauss E; Slick DJ; Levy-Bencheton J; Hunter M; MacDonald SW; Hultsch DF
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2002 Jul; 17(5):423-44. PubMed ID: 14591998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. California Verbal Learning Test indicators of suboptimal performance in a sample of head-injury litigants.
    Slick DJ; Iverson GL; Green P
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2000 Oct; 22(5):569-79. PubMed ID: 11094392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Malingering and other validity considerations in the neuropsychological evaluation of mild head injury.
    Trueblood W; Schmidt M
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1993 Jul; 15(4):578-90. PubMed ID: 8354710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of response bias in mild head injury: beyond malingering tests.
    Millis SR; Volinsky CT
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2001 Dec; 23(6):809-28. PubMed ID: 11910546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can head injury patients simulate malingering?
    Ju D; Varney NR
    Appl Neuropsychol; 2000; 7(4):201-7. PubMed ID: 11296682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Classification accuracy of multiple visual spatial measures in the detection of suspect effort.
    Whiteside D; Wald D; Busse M
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2011 Feb; 25(2):287-301. PubMed ID: 21331981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of warning on feigned malingering on the WAIS-R in college samples.
    Johnson JL; Bellah CG; Dodge T; Kelley W; Livingston MM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Aug; 87(1):152-4. PubMed ID: 9760640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development and validation of a Response Bias Scale (RBS) for the MMPI-2.
    Gervais RO; Ben-Porath YS; Wygant DB; Green P
    Assessment; 2007 Jun; 14(2):196-208. PubMed ID: 17504891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing student and patient simulated malingerers' performance on standard neuropsychological measures to detect feigned cognitive deficits.
    Haines ME; Norris MP
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2001 May; 15(2):171-82. PubMed ID: 11528539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Examining the Test Of Memory Malingering Trial 1 and Word Memory Test Immediate Recognition as screening tools for insufficient effort.
    Bauer L; O'Bryant SE; Lynch JK; McCaffrey RJ; Fisher JM
    Assessment; 2007 Sep; 14(3):215-22. PubMed ID: 17690378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of a novel malingering detection method involving multiple detection strategies.
    Neudecker JJ; Skeel RL
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2009 Feb; 24(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 19395357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differential vulnerability between postconcussion self-report and objective malingering tests in identifying simulated mild head injury.
    Martin RC; Hayes JS; Gouvier WD
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1996 Apr; 18(2):265-75. PubMed ID: 8780961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detecting malingering in traumatic brain injury and chronic pain: a comparison of three forced-choice symptom validity tests.
    Greve KW; Ord J; Curtis KL; Bianchini KJ; Brennan A
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2008 Sep; 22(5):896-918. PubMed ID: 18756391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The latent structure of cognitive symptom exaggeration on the Victoria Symptom Validity Test.
    Frazier TW; Youngstrom EA; Naugle RI; Haggerty KA; Busch RM
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2007 Feb; 22(2):197-211. PubMed ID: 17276652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Coaching and the ability to simulate mild traumatic brain injury symptoms.
    Cato MA; Brewster J; Ryan T; Giuliano AJ
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2002 Dec; 16(4):524-35. PubMed ID: 12822060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating constructs represented by symptom validity tests in forensic neuropsychological assessment of traumatic brain injury.
    Frederick RI; Bowden SC
    J Head Trauma Rehabil; 2009; 24(2):105-22. PubMed ID: 19333066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Memory performance after head injury: contributions of malingering, litigation status, psychological factors, and medication use.
    Suhr J; Tranel D; Wefel J; Barrash J
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1997 Aug; 19(4):500-14. PubMed ID: 9342686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.