These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10806744)

  • 1. [The effect of 25 micrograms misoprostol on induction of labor in late pregnancy].
    Wang H; Li L; Pu L
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1998 Aug; 33(8):469-71. PubMed ID: 10806744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vaginal misoprostol versus concentrated oxytocin and vaginal PGE2 for second-trimester labor induction.
    Ramsey PS; Savage K; Lincoln T; Owen J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 104(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 15229013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of vaginal pH on labor induction with vaginal misoprostol.
    Chandra S; Allen V; Lee W; Fanning C; Young D
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2005 Jun; 17(6):387-91. PubMed ID: 16009641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial.
    Paungmora N; Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Punyavachira P
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2004 Oct; 30(5):358-62. PubMed ID: 15327448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison between 25 micrograms and 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol for labor induction.
    Srisomboon J; Singchai S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1998 Oct; 81(10):779-83. PubMed ID: 9803069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Induction of labor with misoprostol in pregnancies with advanced maternal age.
    Zeteroglu S; Sahin GH; Sahin HA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Dec; 129(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 16406221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A prospective randomized study comparing misoprostol and oxytocin for premature rupture of membranes at term.
    Zeteroğlu S; Engin-Ustün Y; Ustün Y; Güvercinçi M; Sahin G; Kamaci M
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 May; 19(5):283-7. PubMed ID: 16753768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Titrated oral compared with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Cheng SY; Ming H; Lee JC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jan; 111(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 18165400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison between single dose of 50 microg oral misoprostol and 25 microg vaginal misoprostol for labor induction.
    Paisarntantiwong R; Getgan M
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Oct; 88 Suppl 2():S56-62. PubMed ID: 17722318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparative study of the effect of intravaginal misoprostol at 50 and 100 micrograms in cervical ripening and labor induction].
    Reyna-Villasmil E; Guerra-Velásquez M; Torres-Montilla M; Reyna-Villasmil N; Mejia-Montilla J; Labarca-Vincero N
    Invest Clin; 2005 Jun; 46(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 16001749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of orally administered misoprostol to intravenous oxytocin for labor induction in women with favorable cervical examinations.
    Wing DA; Fassett MJ; Guberman C; Tran S; Parrish A; Guinn D
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 190(6):1689-94; discussion 1694-6. PubMed ID: 15284771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Safety and efficacy of oral versus vaginal misoprostol use for induction of labour at term.
    Abbassi RM; Sirichand P; Rizvi S
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2008 Oct; 18(10):625-9. PubMed ID: 18940120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Controlled-release misoprostol vaginal insert in parous women for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Ewert K; Powers B; Robertson S; Alfirevic Z
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Nov; 108(5):1130-7. PubMed ID: 17077234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Meyer M; Pflum J; Howard D
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 15738009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
    Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Oral misoprostol against vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a randomized comparison].
    Henrich W; Dudenhausen JW; Hanel C; Chen FC
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2008 Oct; 212(5):183-8. PubMed ID: 18956276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomized trial of two doses of the prostaglandin E1 analog misoprostol for labor induction.
    Farah LA; Sanchez-Ramos L; Rosa C; Del Valle GO; Gaudier FL; Delke I; Kaunitz AM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Aug; 177(2):364-9; discussion 369-71. PubMed ID: 9290452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Oral administration of misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Windrim R; Bennett K; Mundle W; Young DC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Mar; 89(3):392-7. PubMed ID: 9052592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Misoprostol induction of labor among women with a history of cesarean delivery.
    Choy-Hee L; Raynor BD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 May; 184(6):1115-7. PubMed ID: 11349173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.