274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10807140)
1. Strategic options for antenatal screening for syphilis in the United Kingdom: a cost effectiveness analysis.
Connor N; Roberts J; Nicoll A
J Med Screen; 2000; 7(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 10807140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Syphilis in pregnant women and their children in the United Kingdom: results from national clinician reporting surveys 1994-7.
Hurtig AK; Nicoll A; Carne C; Lissauer T; Connor N; Webster JP; Ratcliffe L
BMJ; 1998 Dec; 317(7173):1617-9. PubMed ID: 9848899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Antenatal syphilis screening using point-of-care testing in Sub-Saharan African countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Kuznik A; Lamorde M; Nyabigambo A; Manabe YC
PLoS Med; 2013 Nov; 10(11):e1001545. PubMed ID: 24223524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Syphilis screening in pregnancy in the United Kingdom, 2010-2011: a national surveillance study.
Townsend CL; Francis K; Peckham CS; Tookey PA
BJOG; 2017 Jan; 124(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 27219027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Positive results from serologic screening for syphilis in pregnancy in the Amsterdam region, 1991-1995].
Bont J; Cairo I; van Doornum GJ; Coutinho RA; Bleker OP
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Nov; 143(46):2312-5. PubMed ID: 10589219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Syphilis-associated perinatal and infant mortality in rural Malawi.
McDermott J; Steketee R; Larsen S; Wirima J
Bull World Health Organ; 1993; 71(6):773-80. PubMed ID: 8313495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Repeat screening for syphilis in pregnancy as an alternative screening strategy in the UK: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Huntington S; Weston G; Seedat F; Marshall J; Bailey H; Tebruegge M; Ahmed I; Turner K; Adams E
BMJ Open; 2020 Nov; 10(11):e038505. PubMed ID: 33444184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Antenatal syphilis screening in sub-Saharan Africa: lessons learned from Tanzania.
Watson-Jones D; Oliff M; Terris-Prestholt F; Changalucha J; Gumodoka B; Mayaud P; Semakafu AM; Kumaranayake L; Gavyole A; Mabey D; Hayes R
Trop Med Int Health; 2005 Sep; 10(9):934-43. PubMed ID: 16135202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of the operational costs of using rapid syphilis tests for the detection of maternal syphilis in Bolivia and Mozambique.
Levin CE; Steele M; Atherly D; García SG; Tinajeros F; Revollo R; Richmond K; Díaz-Olavarrieta C; Martin T; Floriano F; Massango I; Gloyd S
Sex Transm Dis; 2007 Jul; 34(7 Suppl):S47-54. PubMed ID: 17220812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Routine antenatal syphilis screening--a case against.
Obisesan KA; Ahmed Y
Afr J Med Med Sci; 1999; 28(3-4):185-7. PubMed ID: 11205828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Benefit of the serological screening program for syphilis in pregnant women in Amsterdam in the period 1985-1989].
Bindels PJ; Postma MJ; Peerbooms PG; Coutinho RA; van den Hoek JA
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1991 Jul; 135(29):1319-22. PubMed ID: 1907721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness of rapid syphilis screening in prenatal HIV testing programs in Haiti.
Schackman BR; Neukermans CP; Fontain SN; Nolte C; Joseph P; Pape JW; Fitzgerald DW
PLoS Med; 2007 May; 4(5):e183. PubMed ID: 17535105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost effectiveness analysis of antenatal HIV screening in United Kingdom.
Ades AE; Sculpher MJ; Gibb DM; Gupta R; Ratcliffe J
BMJ; 1999 Nov; 319(7219):1230-4. PubMed ID: 10550083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of a dual non-treponemal/treponemal syphilis point-of-care test to prevent adverse pregnancy outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa.
Owusu-Edusei K; Gift TL; Ballard RC
Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Nov; 38(11):997-1003. PubMed ID: 21992974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Syphilis screening in pregnancy].
Zimmermann R
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1993 Oct; 53(10):677-80. PubMed ID: 8270148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness of on-site antenatal screening to prevent congenital syphilis in rural eastern Cape Province, Republic of South Africa.
Blandford JM; Gift TL; Vasaikar S; Mwesigwa-Kayongo D; Dlali P; Bronzan RN
Sex Transm Dis; 2007 Jul; 34(7 Suppl):S61-6. PubMed ID: 17308502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Screening pregnant women for syphilis.
Commun Dis Rep CDR Wkly; 2000 Oct; 10(41):367, 370. PubMed ID: 11068359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Re-screening for syphilis at the time of delivery in areas of high prevalence.
Opai-Tetteh ET; Hoosen AA; Moodley J
S Afr Med J; 1993 Oct; 83(10):725-6. PubMed ID: 8191324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modelling the cost-effectiveness of introducing rapid syphilis tests into an antenatal syphilis screening programme in Mwanza, Tanzania.
Vickerman P; Peeling RW; Terris-Prestholt F; Changalucha J; Mabey D; Watson-Jones D; Watts C
Sex Transm Infect; 2006 Dec; 82 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):v38-43. PubMed ID: 17215276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness of rapid point-of-care prenatal syphilis screening in sub-Saharan Africa.
Rydzak CE; Goldie SJ
Sex Transm Dis; 2008 Sep; 35(9):775-84. PubMed ID: 18607319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
