120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10807142)
1. A blind review and an informed review of interval breast cancer cases in the Limburg screening programme, the Netherlands.
de Rijke JM; Schouten LJ; Schreutelkamp JL; Jochem I; Verbeek AL
J Med Screen; 2000; 7(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 10807142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiological review of interval cancers in an Australian mammographic screening programme. Radiology Quality Assurance Group of BreastScreen Victoria.
Amos AF; Kavanagh AM; Cawson J
J Med Screen; 2000; 7(4):184-9. PubMed ID: 11202584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of review design on percentages of missed interval breast cancers: retrospective study of interval cancers in a population-based screening program.
Hofvind S; Skaane P; Vitak B; Wang H; Thoresen S; Eriksen L; Bjørndal H; Braaten A; Bjurstam N
Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):437-43. PubMed ID: 16244251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of recall rate on earlier screen detection of breast cancers based on the Dutch performance indicators.
Otten JD; Karssemeijer N; Hendriks JH; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; Verbeek AL; de Koning HJ; Holland R
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 May; 97(10):748-54. PubMed ID: 15900044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Delayed diagnosis of breast cancer in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography.
Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; de Koning HJ; Coebergh JW; van Beek M; Hooijen MJ; van de Poll-Franse LV
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Mar; 45(5):774-81. PubMed ID: 19046632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Radiologic analysis of interval cancers in the screening program called Florence Woman Project].
Morrone D; Giorgi D; Ciatto S; Ceresatto E; Catarzi S; Roselli Del Turco R
Radiol Med; 2000 Nov; 100(5):321-5. PubMed ID: 11213408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters.
Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1162-70. PubMed ID: 17652282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improving the detection of cancer in the screening of mammograms.
Laming D; Warren R
J Med Screen; 2000; 7(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 10807143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interval cancer peer review in East Anglia: implications for monitoring doctors as well as the NHS breast screening programme.
Britton PD; McCann J; O'Driscoll D; Hunnam G; Warren RM
Clin Radiol; 2001 Jan; 56(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11162697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality assessment of the mammographic screening programme in the Azienda Sanitaria locale Provincia Milano 1 -- analysis of interval cancers and discussion of possible causes of diagnostic error.
Burani R; Caimi F; Maggioni C; Marinoni G; Pellizzoni R; Pirola ME; Villa R; Ciatto S
Radiol Med; 2005 Mar; 109(3):260-7. PubMed ID: 15775895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Introduction of additional double reading of mammograms by radiographers: effects on a biennial screening programme outcome.
Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; van Ineveld BM; Roumen RM; de Koning HJ
Eur J Cancer; 2008 Jun; 44(9):1223-8. PubMed ID: 18400488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Blinded double reading yields a higher programme sensitivity than non-blinded double reading at digital screening mammography: a prospected population based study in the south of The Netherlands.
Klompenhouwer EG; Voogd AC; den Heeten GJ; Strobbe LJ; de Haan AF; Wauters CA; Broeders MJ; Duijm LE
Eur J Cancer; 2015 Feb; 51(3):391-9. PubMed ID: 25573788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reviewing interval cancers: time well spent?
Gower-Thomas K; Fielder HM; Branston L; Greening S; Beer H; Rogers C
Clin Radiol; 2002 May; 57(5):384-8. PubMed ID: 12014936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Screening mammograms by community radiologists: variability in false-positive rates.
Elmore JG; Miglioretti DL; Reisch LM; Barton MB; Kreuter W; Christiansen CL; Fletcher SW
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Sep; 94(18):1373-80. PubMed ID: 12237283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality control of mammography screening in the Veneto Region. Evaluation of four programs at a local health unit level--analysis of the frequency and diagnostic pattern of interval cancers.
Vettorazzi M; Stocco C; Chirico A; Recanatini S; Saccon S; Mariotto R; Cinquetti S; Moretto T; Sartori P; Stomeo A; Ciatto S
Tumori; 2006; 92(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 16683376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of bilateral breast cancer at biennial screening mammography in the Netherlands: a population-based study.
Setz-Pels W; Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Voogd AC; Jansen FH; Hooijen MJ; Louwman MW
Radiology; 2011 Aug; 260(2):357-63. PubMed ID: 21474705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Value of audits in breast cancer screening quality assurance programmes.
Geertse TD; Holland R; Timmers JM; Paap E; Pijnappel RM; Broeders MJ; den Heeten GJ
Eur Radiol; 2015 Nov; 25(11):3338-47. PubMed ID: 25903711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Observer variability in cancer detection during routine repeat (incident) mammographic screening in a study of two versus one view mammography.
Blanks RG; Wallis MG; Given-Wilson RM
J Med Screen; 1999; 6(3):152-8. PubMed ID: 10572847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The current detectability of breast cancer in a mammographic screening program. A review of the previous mammograms of interval and screen-detected cancers.
van Dijck JA; Verbeek AL; Hendriks JH; Holland R
Cancer; 1993 Sep; 72(6):1933-8. PubMed ID: 8364871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
