These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

44 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10807144)

  • 1. Cost of quality management and information provision for screening: colorectal cancer screening.
    Robert G; Brown J; Garvican L
    J Med Screen; 2000; 7(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 10807144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of screening for cancer in the Nordic countries on deaths, cost and quality of life up to the year 2017.
    Hristova L; Hakama M
    Acta Oncol; 1997; 36 Suppl 9():1-60. PubMed ID: 9143316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost effectiveness of CT colonography for UK NHS colorectal cancer screening of asymptomatic adults aged 60-69 years.
    Lee D; Muston D; Sweet A; Cunningham C; Slater A; Lock K
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2010; 8(3):141-54. PubMed ID: 20369905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Planning for a possible national colorectal cancer screening programme.
    Garvican L
    J Med Screen; 1998; 5(4):187-94. PubMed ID: 9934649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Costs of detection and treatment of cervical cancer, cervical dysplasia and genital warts in the UK.
    Brown RE; Breugelmans JG; Theodoratou D; Bénard S
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2006 Apr; 22(4):663-70. PubMed ID: 16684427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of CT colonography for colorectal cancer screening on the UK NHS: costs, healthcare resources and health outcomes.
    Sweet A; Lee D; Gairy K; Phiri D; Reason T; Lock K
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2011; 9(1):51-64. PubMed ID: 21174482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme--a realistic approach with additional benefits.
    West NJ; Poullis AP; Leicester RJ
    Colorectal Dis; 2008 Sep; 10(7):708-14. PubMed ID: 17956587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Costs and cost effectiveness of a health care provider-directed intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening among Veterans.
    Wolf MS; Fitzner KA; Powell EF; McCaffrey KR; Pickard AS; McKoy JM; Lindenberg J; Schumock GT; Carson KR; Ferreira MR; Dolan NC; Bennett CL
    J Clin Oncol; 2005 Dec; 23(34):8877-83. PubMed ID: 16314648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An economic appraisal of the benefits of screening for open spina bifida.
    Henderson JB
    Soc Sci Med; 1982; 16(5):545-60. PubMed ID: 6808668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relevance of unrelated costs internal and external to the healthcare sector to the outcome of a cost-comparison analysis of secondary prevention: the case of general colorectal cancer screening in the German population.
    Tscheulin DK; Drevs F
    Eur J Health Econ; 2010 Apr; 11(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 19449159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cutting cost and increasing access to colorectal cancer screening: another approach to following the guidelines.
    Fisher JA; Fikry C; Troxel AB
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2006 Jan; 15(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 16434595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-effectiveness of national mandatory screening of all admissions to English National Health Service hospitals for meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a mathematical modelling study.
    Robotham JV; Deeny SR; Fuller C; Hopkins S; Cookson B; Stone S
    Lancet Infect Dis; 2016 Mar; 16(3):348-56. PubMed ID: 26616206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a hybrid screening strategy for colorectal cancer.
    Dinh T; Ladabaum U; Alperin P; Caldwell C; Smith R; Levin TR
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Sep; 11(9):1158-66. PubMed ID: 23542330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Economic evaluation of a brief education, self-management and upper limb exercise training in people with rheumatoid arthritis (EXTRA) programme: a trial-based analysis.
    Manning VL; Kaambwa B; Ratcliffe J; Scott DL; Choy E; Hurley MV; Bearne LM
    Rheumatology (Oxford); 2015 Feb; 54(2):302-9. PubMed ID: 25173349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A modeled economic evaluation of sevelamer for treatment of hyperphosphatemia associated with chronic kidney disease among patients on dialysis in the United Kingdom.
    Bernard L; Mendelssohn D; Dunn E; Hutchison C; Grima DT
    J Med Econ; 2013; 16(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 22857538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The costs of mammography screening in New Zealand: evidence from the pilot programmes.
    Menon A; Devlin NJ; Richardson AK
    N Z Med J; 1994 Dec; 107(991):501-3. PubMed ID: 7830979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Health economics analysis of colorectal screening].
    Boncz I; Sebestyén A; Dózsa C; Pál M; Sándor J; Palásti J; Betlehem J; Ember I
    Magy Onkol; 2004; 48(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 15351803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Health benefits and costs of screening for colorectal cancer in people on dialysis or who have received a kidney transplant.
    Wong G; Li MW; Howard K; Hua DK; Chapman JR; Bourke M; Turner R; Tong A; Craig JC
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2013 Apr; 28(4):917-26. PubMed ID: 23182812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-effectiveness of targeted human immunodeficiency virus screening in an urban emergency department.
    Dowdy DW; Rodriguez RM; Hare CB; Kaplan B
    Acad Emerg Med; 2011 Jul; 18(7):745-53. PubMed ID: 21762236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Option appraisal of population-based colorectal cancer screening programmes in England.
    Tappenden P; Chilcott J; Eggington S; Patnick J; Sakai H; Karnon J
    Gut; 2007 May; 56(5):677-84. PubMed ID: 17142648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.