These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10808001)

  • 1. Back lift versus leg lift: an index and visualization of dynamic lifting strategies.
    Zhang X; Nussbaum MA; Chaffin DB
    J Biomech; 2000 Jun; 33(6):777-82. PubMed ID: 10808001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is coordination of two-joint leg muscles during load lifting consistent with the strategy of minimum fatigue?
    Prilutsky BI; Isaka T; Albrecht AM; Gregor RJ
    J Biomech; 1998 Nov; 31(11):1025-34. PubMed ID: 9880059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anticipatory postural adjustments in the back and leg lift.
    Toussaint HM; Commissaris DA; Beek PJ
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1997 Sep; 29(9):1216-24. PubMed ID: 9309634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lifting strategy and stability in strength-impaired elders.
    Puniello MS; McGibbon CA; Krebs DE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Apr; 26(7):731-7. PubMed ID: 11295889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Kinematics of the trunk and the lower extremities during restricted and unrestricted squats.
    List R; Gülay T; Stoop M; Lorenzetti S
    J Strength Cond Res; 2013 Jun; 27(6):1529-38. PubMed ID: 22990570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Joint moments and muscle activity in the lower extremities and lower back in lifting and lowering tasks.
    de Looze MP; Toussaint HM; van Dieën JH; Kemper HC
    J Biomech; 1993 Sep; 26(9):1067-76. PubMed ID: 8408089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of a weight belt on trunk and leg muscle activity and joint kinematics during the squat exercise.
    Zink AJ; Whiting WC; Vincent WJ; McLaine AJ
    J Strength Cond Res; 2001 May; 15(2):235-40. PubMed ID: 11710410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the age-related changes in movement smoothness in the lower extremity joints during lifting.
    Sakata K; Kogure A; Hosoda M; Isozaki K; Masuda T; Morita S
    Gait Posture; 2010 Jan; 31(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 19800238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adaptation of center of mass control under microgravity in a whole-body lifting task.
    Kingma I; Toussaint HM; Commissaris DA; Savelsbergh GJ
    Exp Brain Res; 1999 Mar; 125(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 10100974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Role of heel lifting in standing balance recovery: A simulation study.
    Cheng KB; Tanabe H; Chen WC; Chiu HT
    J Biomech; 2018 Jan; 67():69-77. PubMed ID: 29221901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of floor slope and load carriage on standing posture.
    Reiser RF; Dalton EA
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2005; 41():25-30. PubMed ID: 15850077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Static versus dynamic predictions of protective stepping following waist-pull perturbations in young and older adults.
    Pai YC; Rogers MW; Patton J; Cain TD; Hanke TA
    J Biomech; 1998 Dec; 31(12):1111-8. PubMed ID: 9882043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Segment inertial parameter evaluation in two anthropometric models by application of a dynamic linked segment model.
    Kingma I; Toussaint HM; De Looze MP; Van Dieen JH
    J Biomech; 1996 May; 29(5):693-704. PubMed ID: 8707800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Body motion during repetitive isodynamic lifting: a comparative study of normal subjects and low-back pain patients.
    Rudy TE; Boston JR; Lieber SJ; Kubinski JA; Stacey BR
    Pain; 2003 Sep; 105(1-2):319-26. PubMed ID: 14499450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bottom-up estimation of joint moments during manual lifting using orientation sensors instead of position sensors.
    Faber GS; Kingma I; van Dieën JH
    J Biomech; 2010 May; 43(7):1432-6. PubMed ID: 20189574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of mental processing on low back load while lifting an object.
    Katsuhira J; Matsudaira K; Iwakiri K; Kimura Y; Ohashi T; Ono R; Sugita S; Fukuda K; Abe S; Maruyama H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(13):E832-9. PubMed ID: 23722573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of squat and stoop dynamic liftings: muscle forces and internal spinal loads.
    Bazrgari B; Shirazi-Adl A; Arjmand N
    Eur Spine J; 2007 May; 16(5):687-99. PubMed ID: 17103232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Asymmetric low back loading in asymmetric lifting movements is not prevented by pelvic twist.
    Kingma I; van Dieën JH; de Looze M; Toussaint HM; Dolan P; Baten CT
    J Biomech; 1998 Jun; 31(6):527-34. PubMed ID: 9755037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inter- and intra-individual variability in the kinematics of the back squat.
    Kristiansen M; Rasmussen GHF; Sloth ME; Voigt M
    Hum Mov Sci; 2019 Oct; 67():102510. PubMed ID: 31442623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Toward a quantitative definition of manual lifting postures.
    Burgess-Limerick R; Abernethy B
    Hum Factors; 1997 Mar; 39(1):141-8. PubMed ID: 9302886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.