169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10808151)
1. Left ventricular function and mass after orthotopic heart transplantation: a comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with echocardiography.
Bellenger NG; Marcus NJ; Davies C; Yacoub M; Banner NR; Pennell DJ
J Heart Lung Transplant; 2000 May; 19(5):444-52. PubMed ID: 10808151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in heart failure by echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance; are they interchangeable?
Bellenger NG; Burgess MI; Ray SG; Lahiri A; Coats AJ; Cleland JG; Pennell DJ
Eur Heart J; 2000 Aug; 21(16):1387-96. PubMed ID: 10952828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of echocardiographic and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging measurements of functional single ventricular volumes, mass, and ejection fraction (from the Pediatric Heart Network Fontan Cross-Sectional Study).
Margossian R; Schwartz ML; Prakash A; Wruck L; Colan SD; Atz AM; Bradley TJ; Fogel MA; Hurwitz LM; Marcus E; Powell AJ; Printz BF; Puchalski MD; Rychik J; Shirali G; Williams R; Yoo SJ; Geva T;
Am J Cardiol; 2009 Aug; 104(3):419-28. PubMed ID: 19616678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of left ventricular parameters in orthotopic heart transplant recipients using dual-source CT and contrast-enhanced echocardiography: comparison with MRI.
Arraiza M; Azcárate PM; De Cecco CN; Viteri G; Simón-Yarza I; Hernández-Estefanía R; Rábago G; Bastarrika G
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3282-8. PubMed ID: 22561021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cross-modality Accuracy of Dual-step, Prospectively Electrocardiography-triggered Dual-source Computed Tomorgaphy Compared With Same-day Echocardiography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Follow-up of Heart-transplant Patients.
Marano R; Merlino B; Natale L; Savino G; Vingiani V; Rovere G; Larici AR; Iezzi R; Magarelli N; Lombardo A; Pasquale M; Manfredi R
J Thorac Imaging; 2018 Jul; 33(4):217-224. PubMed ID: 29389808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Routine breath-hold gradient echo MRI-derived right ventricular mass, volumes and function: accuracy, reproducibility and coherence study.
Beygui F; Furber A; Delépine S; Helft G; Metzger JP; Geslin P; Le Jeune JJ
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2004 Dec; 20(6):509-16. PubMed ID: 15856634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of techniques for the measurement of left ventricular function following cardiac transplantation.
Bellenger NG; Marcus NJ; Rajappan K; Yacoub M; Banner NR; Pennell DJ
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2002; 4(2):255-63. PubMed ID: 12074140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative assessment of left ventricular size and function in cardiac transplant recipients: Side-by-side comparison of real time two-dimensional echocardiography, contrast-enhanced two-dimensional echocardiography, three-dimensional echocardiography, and contrast-enhanced three-dimensional echocardiography as compared to magnetic resonance imaging.
Rodriguez-Mañero M; Azcárate-Agüero P; Kreidieh B; Alvez MT; Martínez-Monzonís A; Diaz-Dorronsoro A; Cid-Menéndez A; González-Juanatey JR; Barba-Cosials J; Rábago G; Bastarrika G
Echocardiography; 2019 Feb; 36(2):306-311. PubMed ID: 30600566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intra-observer and interobserver reproducibility of right ventricle volumes, function and mass by cardiac magnetic resonance.
Catalano O; Antonaci S; Opasich C; Moro G; Mussida M; Perotti M; Calsamiglia G; Frascaroli M; Baldi M; Cobelli F
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2007 Oct; 8(10):807-14. PubMed ID: 17885519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Right ventricular remodelling in pulmonary arterial hypertension with three-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
Grapsa J; O'Regan DP; Pavlopoulos H; Durighel G; Dawson D; Nihoyannopoulos P
Eur J Echocardiogr; 2010 Jan; 11(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 19939819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New generation 3-dimensional echocardiography for left ventricular volumetric and functional measurements: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance.
Nikitin NP; Constantin C; Loh PH; Ghosh J; Lukaschuk EI; Bennett A; Hurren S; Alamgir F; Clark AL; Cleland JG
Eur J Echocardiogr; 2006 Oct; 7(5):365-72. PubMed ID: 16916621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automated assessment of heart chamber volumes and function in patients with previous myocardial infarction using multidetector computed tomography.
Fuchs A; Kühl JT; Lønborg J; Engstrøm T; Vejlstrup N; Køber L; Kofoed KF
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2012; 6(5):325-34. PubMed ID: 23040538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Left ventricular mass and systolic function in children with chronic kidney disease-comparing echocardiography with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
Arnold R; Schwendinger D; Jung S; Pohl M; Jung B; Geiger J; Gimpel C
Pediatr Nephrol; 2016 Feb; 31(2):255-65. PubMed ID: 26342304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fast data acquisition and analysis with real time triplane echocardiography for the assessment of left ventricular size and function: a validation study.
Nucifora G; Badano LP; Dall'Armellina E; Gianfagna P; Allocca G; Fioretti PM
Echocardiography; 2009 Jan; 26(1):66-75. PubMed ID: 19054037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Head-to-head comparison of left ventricular function assessment with 64-row computed tomography, biplane left cineventriculography, and both 2- and 3-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging as the reference standard.
Greupner J; Zimmermann E; Grohmann A; Dübel HP; Althoff TF; Borges AC; Rutsch W; Schlattmann P; Hamm B; Dewey M
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 May; 59(21):1897-907. PubMed ID: 22595410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Usefulness of three-dimensional echocardiography for the assessment of ventricular function in children: Comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance, with a focus on patients with arrhythmia.
Kamińska H; Małek ŁA; Barczuk-Falęcka M; Werner B
Cardiol J; 2021; 28(4):549-557. PubMed ID: 30912575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Global longitudinal strain and global circumferential strain by speckle-tracking echocardiography and feature-tracking cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with left ventricular ejection fraction.
Onishi T; Saha SK; Delgado-Montero A; Ludwig DR; Onishi T; Schelbert EB; Schwartzman D; Gorcsan J
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2015 May; 28(5):587-96. PubMed ID: 25577185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative assessment of left ventricular size and function: side-by-side comparison of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography and computed tomography with magnetic resonance reference.
Sugeng L; Mor-Avi V; Weinert L; Niel J; Ebner C; Steringer-Mascherbauer R; Schmidt F; Galuschky C; Schummers G; Lang RM; Nesser HJ
Circulation; 2006 Aug; 114(7):654-61. PubMed ID: 16894035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction using freehand transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.
Mannaerts HF; Van Der Heide JA; Kamp O; Papavassiliu T; Marcus JT; Beek A; Van Rossum AC; Twisk J; Visser CA
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2003 Feb; 16(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 12574735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of short-axis cardiac MRI automatically derived from scout acquisitions in free-breathing and breath-holding modes.
Danilouchkine MG; Westenberg JJ; Lelieveldt BP; Reiber JH
MAGMA; 2005 Mar; 18(1):7-18. PubMed ID: 15682287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
