These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10808151)
1. Left ventricular function and mass after orthotopic heart transplantation: a comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with echocardiography. Bellenger NG; Marcus NJ; Davies C; Yacoub M; Banner NR; Pennell DJ J Heart Lung Transplant; 2000 May; 19(5):444-52. PubMed ID: 10808151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in heart failure by echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance; are they interchangeable? Bellenger NG; Burgess MI; Ray SG; Lahiri A; Coats AJ; Cleland JG; Pennell DJ Eur Heart J; 2000 Aug; 21(16):1387-96. PubMed ID: 10952828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of echocardiographic and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging measurements of functional single ventricular volumes, mass, and ejection fraction (from the Pediatric Heart Network Fontan Cross-Sectional Study). Margossian R; Schwartz ML; Prakash A; Wruck L; Colan SD; Atz AM; Bradley TJ; Fogel MA; Hurwitz LM; Marcus E; Powell AJ; Printz BF; Puchalski MD; Rychik J; Shirali G; Williams R; Yoo SJ; Geva T; Am J Cardiol; 2009 Aug; 104(3):419-28. PubMed ID: 19616678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of left ventricular parameters in orthotopic heart transplant recipients using dual-source CT and contrast-enhanced echocardiography: comparison with MRI. Arraiza M; Azcárate PM; De Cecco CN; Viteri G; Simón-Yarza I; Hernández-Estefanía R; Rábago G; Bastarrika G Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3282-8. PubMed ID: 22561021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cross-modality Accuracy of Dual-step, Prospectively Electrocardiography-triggered Dual-source Computed Tomorgaphy Compared With Same-day Echocardiography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Follow-up of Heart-transplant Patients. Marano R; Merlino B; Natale L; Savino G; Vingiani V; Rovere G; Larici AR; Iezzi R; Magarelli N; Lombardo A; Pasquale M; Manfredi R J Thorac Imaging; 2018 Jul; 33(4):217-224. PubMed ID: 29389808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Routine breath-hold gradient echo MRI-derived right ventricular mass, volumes and function: accuracy, reproducibility and coherence study. Beygui F; Furber A; Delépine S; Helft G; Metzger JP; Geslin P; Le Jeune JJ Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2004 Dec; 20(6):509-16. PubMed ID: 15856634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of techniques for the measurement of left ventricular function following cardiac transplantation. Bellenger NG; Marcus NJ; Rajappan K; Yacoub M; Banner NR; Pennell DJ J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2002; 4(2):255-63. PubMed ID: 12074140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative assessment of left ventricular size and function in cardiac transplant recipients: Side-by-side comparison of real time two-dimensional echocardiography, contrast-enhanced two-dimensional echocardiography, three-dimensional echocardiography, and contrast-enhanced three-dimensional echocardiography as compared to magnetic resonance imaging. Rodriguez-Mañero M; Azcárate-Agüero P; Kreidieh B; Alvez MT; Martínez-Monzonís A; Diaz-Dorronsoro A; Cid-Menéndez A; González-Juanatey JR; Barba-Cosials J; Rábago G; Bastarrika G Echocardiography; 2019 Feb; 36(2):306-311. PubMed ID: 30600566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intra-observer and interobserver reproducibility of right ventricle volumes, function and mass by cardiac magnetic resonance. Catalano O; Antonaci S; Opasich C; Moro G; Mussida M; Perotti M; Calsamiglia G; Frascaroli M; Baldi M; Cobelli F J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2007 Oct; 8(10):807-14. PubMed ID: 17885519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Right ventricular remodelling in pulmonary arterial hypertension with three-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Grapsa J; O'Regan DP; Pavlopoulos H; Durighel G; Dawson D; Nihoyannopoulos P Eur J Echocardiogr; 2010 Jan; 11(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 19939819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New generation 3-dimensional echocardiography for left ventricular volumetric and functional measurements: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance. Nikitin NP; Constantin C; Loh PH; Ghosh J; Lukaschuk EI; Bennett A; Hurren S; Alamgir F; Clark AL; Cleland JG Eur J Echocardiogr; 2006 Oct; 7(5):365-72. PubMed ID: 16916621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automated assessment of heart chamber volumes and function in patients with previous myocardial infarction using multidetector computed tomography. Fuchs A; Kühl JT; Lønborg J; Engstrøm T; Vejlstrup N; Køber L; Kofoed KF J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2012; 6(5):325-34. PubMed ID: 23040538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Left ventricular mass and systolic function in children with chronic kidney disease-comparing echocardiography with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Arnold R; Schwendinger D; Jung S; Pohl M; Jung B; Geiger J; Gimpel C Pediatr Nephrol; 2016 Feb; 31(2):255-65. PubMed ID: 26342304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fast data acquisition and analysis with real time triplane echocardiography for the assessment of left ventricular size and function: a validation study. Nucifora G; Badano LP; Dall'Armellina E; Gianfagna P; Allocca G; Fioretti PM Echocardiography; 2009 Jan; 26(1):66-75. PubMed ID: 19054037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Head-to-head comparison of left ventricular function assessment with 64-row computed tomography, biplane left cineventriculography, and both 2- and 3-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging as the reference standard. Greupner J; Zimmermann E; Grohmann A; Dübel HP; Althoff TF; Borges AC; Rutsch W; Schlattmann P; Hamm B; Dewey M J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 May; 59(21):1897-907. PubMed ID: 22595410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Usefulness of three-dimensional echocardiography for the assessment of ventricular function in children: Comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance, with a focus on patients with arrhythmia. Kamińska H; Małek ŁA; Barczuk-Falęcka M; Werner B Cardiol J; 2021; 28(4):549-557. PubMed ID: 30912575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Global longitudinal strain and global circumferential strain by speckle-tracking echocardiography and feature-tracking cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with left ventricular ejection fraction. Onishi T; Saha SK; Delgado-Montero A; Ludwig DR; Onishi T; Schelbert EB; Schwartzman D; Gorcsan J J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2015 May; 28(5):587-96. PubMed ID: 25577185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative assessment of left ventricular size and function: side-by-side comparison of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography and computed tomography with magnetic resonance reference. Sugeng L; Mor-Avi V; Weinert L; Niel J; Ebner C; Steringer-Mascherbauer R; Schmidt F; Galuschky C; Schummers G; Lang RM; Nesser HJ Circulation; 2006 Aug; 114(7):654-61. PubMed ID: 16894035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction using freehand transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Mannaerts HF; Van Der Heide JA; Kamp O; Papavassiliu T; Marcus JT; Beek A; Van Rossum AC; Twisk J; Visser CA J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2003 Feb; 16(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 12574735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of short-axis cardiac MRI automatically derived from scout acquisitions in free-breathing and breath-holding modes. Danilouchkine MG; Westenberg JJ; Lelieveldt BP; Reiber JH MAGMA; 2005 Mar; 18(1):7-18. PubMed ID: 15682287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]