These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

53 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10808217)

  • 1. Interrelationship between cross-sectional and sagittal imaging in computer-assisted dental implant tomography.
    Thunthy KH
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Mar; 29(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 10808217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of over- and underexposure on the sharpness of the image of a marker in computer-assisted dental implant tomography.
    Thunthy KH
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jul; 31(4):278-80. PubMed ID: 12087446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-dimensional computed tomography imaging in dentistry.
    Kawamata A; Ariji Y; Langlais RP
    Dent Clin North Am; 2000 Apr; 44(2):395-410. PubMed ID: 10740775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the inferior alveolar canal by cross-sectional hypocycloidal tomography.
    Aryatawong S; Aryatawong K
    Implant Dent; 2000; 9(4):339-45. PubMed ID: 11307556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computerized tomosynthesis of dental tissues.
    Groenhuis RA; Webber RL; Ruttimann UE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1983 Aug; 56(2):206-14. PubMed ID: 6578484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of computerized tomography for the evaluation of mandibular sites prior to implant placement.
    Sforza NM; Franchini F; Lamma A; Botticelli S; Ghigi G
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2007 Dec; 27(6):589-95. PubMed ID: 18092453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Technical note. Sagittal tomography as an adjunct to cross-sectional evaluation of select implant sites.
    Monahan R; Furkart AJ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Nov; 25(5):298-301. PubMed ID: 9161186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An in vivo comparison of diagnostic information obtained from tuned-aperture computed tomography and conventional dental radiographic imaging modalities.
    Webber RL; Messura JK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Aug; 88(2):239-47. PubMed ID: 10468470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative study of image quality for MSCT and CBCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial radiology applications.
    Loubele M; Maes F; Jacobs R; van Steenberghe D; White SC; Suetens P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):222-6. PubMed ID: 18583372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cross-sectional presurgical implant imaging using tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT).
    Liang H; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Lang LA
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jul; 28(4):232-7. PubMed ID: 10455387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Blur reduction of conventional film-based tomograms for pre-surgical evaluation of potential mandibular implant sites.
    Mayfield-Donahoo TL; Stokely EM; Jeffcoat MK
    J Periodontol; 1997 Apr; 68(4):362-8. PubMed ID: 9150041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Techniques for the use of CT imaging for the fabrication of surgical guides.
    Ganz SD
    Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2006 Mar; 14(1):75-97. PubMed ID: 16522511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using cross-sectional tomography to perform exploratory radiography in lieu of exploratory surgery.
    Silverstein LH; Callan D; Kurtzman D
    Dent Today; 1997 Nov; 16(11):94-5, 98-9. PubMed ID: 9560740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparative study for spatial resolution and subjective image characteristics of a multi-slice CT and a cone-beam CT for dental use.
    Watanabe H; Honda E; Tetsumura A; Kurabayashi T
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):397-402. PubMed ID: 19819091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Computed tomography in dental implantation. Technical and methodological aspects].
    Preda L; Rodriguez y Baena R; La Fianza A; Dore R; Di Maggio EM; Schifino MR; Campani R
    Radiol Med; 1999 Dec; 98(6):447-53. PubMed ID: 10755003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiographic modalities for diagnosis and treatment planning in implant dentistry.
    Garg AK; Vicari A
    Implant Soc; 1995; 5(5):7-11. PubMed ID: 9571835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two-dimensional-three-dimensional reconstruction computed tomography techniques.
    Yune HY
    Dent Clin North Am; 1993 Oct; 37(4):613-26. PubMed ID: 8224336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Multi-slice helical CT: biggest pitch does not mean dosimetric bargain].
    Cordoliani Y
    J Radiol; 2000 Jun; 81(6):587-8. PubMed ID: 10844334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The expanding influence of computed tomography and the application of computer-guided implantology.
    Mandelaris GA; Rosenfeld AL
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2008 Jun; 20(5):297-305; quiz 306. PubMed ID: 18649832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of a computerized tomography-based software program with a flapless surgical technique in implant dentistry: a case report.
    Terzioğlu H; Akkaya M; Ozan O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(1):137-42. PubMed ID: 19344037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.