126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10808219)
21. Perceptibility of defects in an aluminum test object: a comparison of the RVG-S and first generation VIXA systems with and without added niobium filtration.
Wakoh M; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Kelly MS; Kuroyanagi K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):211-4. PubMed ID: 9161163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Digital radiology using the DIGORA registration technic].
van der Stelt PF
Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 1996; 51(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 9289753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Physical evaluation of a system for direct digital intra-oral radiography based on a charge-coupled device.
Yoshiura K; Stamatakis HC; Welander U; McDavid WD; Shi XQ; Ban S; Kawazu T; Tatsumi M; Kanda S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Sep; 28(5):277-83. PubMed ID: 10490745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Dependency of dose response of five charge-coupled device-based digital intra-oral radiographic systems on tube voltage.
Nishikawa K; Shibuya H; Wakoh M; Kuroyanagi K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Nov; 28(6):364-7. PubMed ID: 10578191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Experience of Norwegian general dental practitioners with solid state and storage phosphor detectors.
Wenzel A; Møystad A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jul; 30(4):203-8. PubMed ID: 11681481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 2: optimum exposure conditions for detection of small mass changes in 6 intraoral radiography systems.
Yoshiura K; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Tatsumi M; Tokumori K; Tanaka T; Kanda S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Jan; 87(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 9927091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of Efficiency and Image Quality of Photostimulable Phosphor Plate and Charge-Coupled Device Receptors in Dental Radiography.
Zhang W; Huynh C; Jadhav A; Pinales J; Arvizu L; Tsai J; Flores N
J Dent Educ; 2019 Oct; 83(10):1205-1212. PubMed ID: 31235501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. On the dynamic range of different X-ray photon detectors in intra-oral radiography. A comparison of image quality in film, charge-coupled device and storage phosphor systems.
Borg E; Gröndahl HG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Apr; 25(2):82-8. PubMed ID: 9446978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Dental digital radiography.
Moore WS
Tex Dent J; 2002 May; 119(5):404-12. PubMed ID: 12046403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A comparison of 18 different x-ray detectors currently used in dentistry.
Farman AG; Farman TT
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Apr; 99(4):485-9. PubMed ID: 15772598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of the psychophysical properties of various intraoral film and digital systems by means of the perceptibility curve test.
Yoshiura K; Welander U; McDavid WD; Li G; Shi XQ; Nakayama E; Shimizu M; Okamura K; Kanda S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 15314001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of physical properties of different digital intraoral sensors.
Al-Rawi W; Teich S
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2013 Sep; 34(8):e76-83. PubMed ID: 24568289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. High resolution charge-coupled device sensor vs. medium resolution photostimulable phosphor plate digital receptors for detection of root fractures in vitro.
Wenzel A; Kirkevang LL
Dent Traumatol; 2005 Feb; 21(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 15660754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Digital radiography: the standard of care.
Samaras CD
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2008 Oct; 29(8):506, 508-9. PubMed ID: 18935789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of calibration and automatic greyscale adjustment on detectability of simulated bone lesions using a storage phosphor system.
Versteeg CH; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jul; 27(4):240-4. PubMed ID: 9780903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comments on noise and resolution of the DenOptix radiography system.
Couture RA
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Jun; 95(6):746-51. PubMed ID: 12789159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Principles of digital imaging.
van der Stelt PF
Dent Clin North Am; 2000 Apr; 44(2):237-48, v. PubMed ID: 10740766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The perceptibility curve test applied to direct digital dental radiography.
Yoshiura K; Stamatakis H; Shi XQ; Welander U; McDavid WD; Kristoffersen J; Tronje G
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 May; 27(3):131-5. PubMed ID: 9693524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Perceptibility curve test for digital radiographs before and after correction for attenuation and correction for attenuation and visual response.
Li G; Welander U; Yoshiura K; Shi XQ; McDavid WD
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):372-8. PubMed ID: 15070839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Bitewing examination with four digital receptors.
Bahrami G; Hagstrøm C; Wenzel A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Sep; 32(5):317-21. PubMed ID: 14709607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
