These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10808225)

  • 1. Optimisation of patient doses in programmable dental panoramic radiography.
    Lecomber AR; Downes SL; Mokhtari M; Faulkner K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Mar; 29(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 10808225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Paediatric absorbed doses from rotational panoramic radiography.
    Hayakawa Y; Kobayashi N; Kuroyanagi K; Nishizawa K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Sep; 30(5):285-92. PubMed ID: 11571549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit.
    Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; Brooks SL
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jul; 32(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 13679353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of patient dose from imaging protocols for dental implant planning using conventional radiography and computed tomography.
    Lecomber AR; Yoneyama Y; Lovelock DJ; Hosoi T; Adams AM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Sep; 30(5):255-9. PubMed ID: 11571544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Absorbed organ and effective doses from digital intra-oral and panoramic radiography applying the ICRP 103 recommendations for effective dose estimations.
    Granlund C; Thilander-Klang A; Ylhan B; Lofthag-Hansen S; Ekestubbe A
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 89(1066):20151052. PubMed ID: 27452261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The reduction of dose in paediatric panoramic radiography: the impact of collimator height and programme selection.
    Davis AT; Safi H; Maddison SM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(2):20140223. PubMed ID: 25352427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiation doses in examination of lower third molars with computed tomography and conventional radiography.
    Ohman A; Kull L; Andersson J; Flygare L
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):445-52. PubMed ID: 19033429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part I: Patient exposure.
    Gijbels F; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Debaveye D; Verlinden S; Sanderink G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):145-9. PubMed ID: 15897284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using GafChromic film to estimate the effective dose from dental cone beam CT and panoramic radiography.
    Al-Okshi A; Nilsson M; Petersson A; Wiese M; Lindh C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(7):20120343. PubMed ID: 23610090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hypothetical mortality risk associated with spiral tomography of the maxilla and mandible prior to endosseous implant treatment.
    Dula K; Mini R; Lambrecht JT; van der Stelt PF; Schneeberger P; Clemens G; Sanderink H; Buser D
    Eur J Oral Sci; 1997 Apr; 105(2):123-9. PubMed ID: 9151064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view.
    Hirsch E; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Silva MA
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 18606748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiation dose reduction in direct digital panoramic radiography.
    Gavala S; Donta C; Tsiklakis K; Boziari A; Kamenopoulou V; Stamatakis HC
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 18448296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of lead apron shielding on absorbed doses from panoramic radiography.
    Rottke D; Grossekettler L; Sawada K; Poxleitner P; Schulze D
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(10):20130302. PubMed ID: 24404601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shielding effect of thyroid collar for digital panoramic radiography.
    Han GS; Cheng JG; Li G; Ma XC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(9):20130265. PubMed ID: 24005060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dosimetry of a cone-beam computed tomography machine compared with a digital x-ray machine in orthodontic imaging.
    Grünheid T; Kolbeck Schieck JR; Pliska BT; Ahmad M; Larson BE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):436-43. PubMed ID: 22464525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of x-radiation doses between conventional and rare earth panoramic radiographic techniques.
    Skoczylas LJ; Preece JW; Langlais RP; McDavid WD; Waggener RG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Dec; 68(6):776-81. PubMed ID: 2594329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Absorbed and effective doses from cone beam volumetric imaging for implant planning.
    Okano T; Harata Y; Sugihara Y; Sakaino R; Tsuchida R; Iwai K; Seki K; Araki K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Feb; 38(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 19176649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of radiation levels from computed tomography and conventional dental radiographs.
    Ngan DC; Kharbanda OP; Geenty JP; Darendeliler MA
    Aust Orthod J; 2003 Nov; 19(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 14703331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy of lead foil for reducing doses in the head and neck: a simulation study using digital intraoral systems.
    Nejaim Y; Silva AI; Brasil DM; Vasconcelos KF; Haiter Neto F; Boscolo FN
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(8):20150065. PubMed ID: 26084474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dose reduction in panoramic radiography.
    Lecomber AR; Faulkner K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 May; 22(2):69-73. PubMed ID: 8375557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.