These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10809456)

  • 1. Physician understanding of patient resuscitation preferences: insights and clinical implications.
    Wenger NS; Phillips RS; Teno JM; Oye RK; Dawson NV; Liu H; Califf R; Layde P; Hakim R; Lynn J
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2000 May; 48(S1):S44-51. PubMed ID: 10809456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A prospective study of patient-physician communication about resuscitation.
    Golin CE; Wenger NS; Liu H; Dawson NV; Teno JM; Desbiens NA; Lynn J; Oye RK; Phillips RS
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2000 May; 48(S1):S52-60. PubMed ID: 10809457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors associated with use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in seriously ill hospitalized adults.
    Goodlin SJ; Zhong Z; Lynn J; Teno JM; Fago JP; Desbiens N; Connors AF; Wenger NS; Phillips RS
    JAMA; 1999 Dec 22-29; 282(24):2333-9. PubMed ID: 10612321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preferences for cardiopulmonary resuscitation: physician-patient agreement and hospital resource use. The SUPPORT Investigators.
    Teno JM; Hakim RB; Knaus WA; Wenger NS; Phillips RS; Wu AW; Layde P; Connors AF; Dawson NV; Lynn J
    J Gen Intern Med; 1995 Apr; 10(4):179-86. PubMed ID: 7790978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors associated with do-not-resuscitate orders: patients' preferences, prognoses, and physicians' judgments. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.
    Hakim RB; Teno JM; Harrell FE; Knaus WA; Wenger N; Phillips RS; Layde P; Califf R; Connors AF; Lynn J
    Ann Intern Med; 1996 Aug; 125(4):284-93. PubMed ID: 8678391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal Investigators.
    JAMA; 1995 Nov 22-29; 274(20):1591-8. PubMed ID: 7474243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outcomes, preferences for resuscitation, and physician-patient communication among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments.
    Haidet P; Hamel MB; Davis RB; Wenger N; Reding D; Kussin PS; Connors AF; Lynn J; Weeks JC; Phillips RS
    Am J Med; 1998 Sep; 105(3):222-9. PubMed ID: 9753025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Choices of seriously ill patients about cardiopulmonary resuscitation: correlates and outcomes. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments.
    Phillips RS; Wenger NS; Teno J; Oye RK; Youngner S; Califf R; Layde P; Desbiens N; Connors AF; Lynn J
    Am J Med; 1996 Feb; 100(2):128-37. PubMed ID: 8629646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors associated with change in resuscitation preference of seriously ill patients. The SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments.
    Rosenfeld KE; Wenger NS; Phillips RS; Connors AF; Dawson NV; Layde P; Califf RM; Liu H; Lynn J; Oye RK
    Arch Intern Med; 1996 Jul; 156(14):1558-64. PubMed ID: 8687264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Communication and decision-making in seriously ill patients: findings of the SUPPORT project. The Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments.
    Covinsky KE; Fuller JD; Yaffe K; Johnston CB; Hamel MB; Lynn J; Teno JM; Phillips RS
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2000 May; 48(S1):S187-93. PubMed ID: 10809474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Advance directives for seriously ill hospitalized patients: effectiveness with the patient self-determination act and the SUPPORT intervention. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.
    Teno J; Lynn J; Wenger N; Phillips RS; Murphy DP; Connors AF; Desbiens N; Fulkerson W; Bellamy P; Knaus WA
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1997 Apr; 45(4):500-7. PubMed ID: 9100721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient preferences for communication with physicians about end-of-life decisions. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preference for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.
    Hofmann JC; Wenger NS; Davis RB; Teno J; Connors AF; Desbiens N; Lynn J; Phillips RS
    Ann Intern Med; 1997 Jul; 127(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 9214246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preferences for cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
    Puopolo AL; Kennard MJ; Mallatratt L; Follen MA; Desbiens NA; Conners AF; Califf R; Walzer J; Soukup J; Davis RB; Phillips RS
    Image J Nurs Sch; 1997; 29(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 9378477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patients who want their family and physician to make resuscitation decisions for them: observations from SUPPORT and HELP. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. Hospitalized Elderly Longitudinal Project.
    Puchalski CM; Zhong Z; Jacobs MM; Fox E; Lynn J; Harrold J; Galanos A; Phillips RS; Califf R; Teno JM
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2000 May; 48(S1):S84-90. PubMed ID: 10809461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Age-related differences in care preferences, treatment decisions, and clinical outcomes of seriously ill hospitalized adults: lessons from SUPPORT.
    Hamel MB; Lynn J; Teno JM; Covinsky KE; Wu AW; Galanos A; Desbiens NA; Phillips RS
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2000 May; 48(S1):S176-82. PubMed ID: 10809472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 'Why didn't you write a not-for-cardiopulmonary resuscitation order?' Unexpected death or failure of process?
    Levinson M; Mills A; Barrett J; Sritharan G; Gellie A
    Aust Health Rev; 2018 Feb; 42(1):53-58. PubMed ID: 27978419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Old age and poor prognosis increase the likelihood of disagreement between cancer patients and their oncologists on the indication for resuscitation attempt.
    Saltbaek L; Michelsen HM; Nelausen KM; Gut R; Nielsen DL
    Support Care Cancer; 2013 Dec; 21(12):3363-70. PubMed ID: 23925557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surrogates' predictions of seriously ill patients' resuscitation preferences.
    Layde PM; Beam CA; Broste SK; Connors AF; Desbiens N; Lynn J; Phillips RS; Reding D; Teno J; Vidaillet H
    Arch Fam Med; 1995 Jun; 4(6):518-23. PubMed ID: 7773427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preferences for cardiopulmonary resuscitation among patients 80 years or older: the views of patients and their physicians.
    O'Donnell H; Phillips RS; Wenger N; Teno J; Davis RB; Hamel MB
    J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2003; 4(3):139-44. PubMed ID: 12854987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Resuscitation preferences among patients with severe congestive heart failure: results from the SUPPORT project. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments.
    Krumholz HM; Phillips RS; Hamel MB; Teno JM; Bellamy P; Broste SK; Califf RM; Vidaillet H; Davis RB; Muhlbaier LH; Connors AF; Lynn J; Goldman L
    Circulation; 1998 Aug; 98(7):648-55. PubMed ID: 9715857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.