157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10810421)
1. Diagnosis and survey of abnormal/atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: a retrospective study.
Giudice A; Rizzo M; Rossi RT; Bonaffini O; Buda CA; Pettineo G
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(2B):1195-9. PubMed ID: 10810421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: is it worthwhile to qualify them further?
Sodhani P; Gupta S; Sehgal A; Singh V; Khan IU; Mitra AB
Indian J Cancer; 2003; 40(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 14716128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical impact of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. A cytohistologic comparison.
Lousuebsakul V; Knutsen SM; Gram IT; Akin MR
Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 10667155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. ASCUS on cervical cytologic smears. Clinical significance.
Yang M; Zachariah S
J Reprod Med; 1997 Jun; 42(6):329-31. PubMed ID: 9219118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Atypical epithelial cells and specimen adequacy: current laboratory practices of participants in the college of American pathologists interlaboratory comparison program in cervicovaginal cytology.
Davey DD; Woodhouse S; Styer P; Stastny J; Mody D
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2000 Feb; 124(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 10656727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. ASCUS: comparative follow-up results related to previous SIL diagnosis.
Alameda F; Fuste P; Conangla M; Gimferrer E; Soler I; Antorn MT; Persico S; Carreras R; Serrano S
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2000; 21(1):81-3. PubMed ID: 10726627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Significance of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance on ThinPrep papanicolaou smears.
Eltabbakh GH; Lipman JN; Mount SL; Morgan A
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Oct; 79(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11006029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality metrics in cervical cytopathology: A single institutional study.
Senthil Kumar D; Ravikumar G
Cytopathology; 2022 Mar; 33(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 34854153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in liquid-based cytologic specimens: results of reflex human papillomavirus testing and histologic follow-up in routine practice with comparison of interpretive and probabilistic reporting methods.
Levi AW; Kelly DP; Rosenthal DL; Ronnett BM
Cancer; 2003 Aug; 99(4):191-7. PubMed ID: 12925979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Histology correlation with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) cytology diagnoses: An argument to ensure ASCUS follow-up that is as aggressive as that for LSIL.
Dvorak KA; Finnemore M; Maksem JA
Diagn Cytopathol; 1999 Oct; 21(4):292-5. PubMed ID: 10495326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Qualifiers of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance help in patient management.
Collins LC; Wang HH; Abu-Jawdeh GM
Mod Pathol; 1996 Jun; 9(6):677-81. PubMed ID: 8782207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Unified methods for vaginal cytological diagnosis are required. Accuracy of the ASCUS respective CIN I compared].
Seidal T; Karakostova P
Lakartidningen; 2000 Feb; 97(8):826-8. PubMed ID: 10741022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. From Papanicolaou to Bethesda: the rationale for a new cervical cytologic classification.
Kurman RJ; Malkasian GD; Sedlis A; Solomon D
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 May; 77(5):779-82. PubMed ID: 1849626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is it possible to define a better ASCUS class in cervicovaginal screening? A review of 187 cases.
Guerrini L; Sama D; Visani M; Cotignoli T; Sintoni C; Maioli P; Lanzanova G; Schincaglia P
Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(4):532-6. PubMed ID: 11480714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of cytologic follow-up as the recommended management for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Alanen KW; Elit LM; Molinaro PA; McLachlin CM
Cancer; 1998 Feb; 84(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 9500646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical implication of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance with or without favoring high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion on cervical smears.
ChangChien CC; Lin H; Eng HL; Chang WK
Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Dec; 22(4):579-85. PubMed ID: 10695204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: interlaboratory comparison and quality assurance monitors.
Davey DD; Naryshkin S; Nielsen ML; Kline TS
Diagn Cytopathol; 1994 Dec; 11(4):390-6. PubMed ID: 7895579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is p16(INK4A) expression more useful than human papillomavirus test to determine the outcome of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance-categorized Pap smear? A comparative analysis using abnormal cervical smears with follow-up biopsies.
Nieh S; Chen SF; Chu TY; Lai HC; Lin YS; Fu E; Gau CH
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Apr; 97(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 15790434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS), low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and histology.
Rossetti D; Gerli S; Saab JC; Di Renzo GC
J Med Liban; 2000; 48(3):127-30. PubMed ID: 11268564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reducing or eliminating use of the category of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance decreases the diagnostic accuracy of the Papanicolaou smear.
Pitman MB; Cibas ES; Powers CN; Renshaw AA; Frable WJ
Cancer; 2002 Jun; 96(3):128-34. PubMed ID: 12115299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
