These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10810839)

  • 1. Effects of judicial instructions and case characteristics in a mock jury trial of battered women who kill.
    Terrance CA; Matheson K; Spanos NP
    Law Hum Behav; 2000 Apr; 24(2):207-29. PubMed ID: 10810839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. From the shadows into the light: How pretrial publicity and deliberation affect mock jurors' decisions, impressions, and memory.
    Ruva CL; Guenther CC
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):294-310. PubMed ID: 25495716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Battered women who kill: the impact of expert testimony and empathy induction in the courtroom.
    Plumm KM; Terrance CA
    Violence Against Women; 2009 Feb; 15(2):186-205. PubMed ID: 19126834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Expert testimony pertaining to battered woman syndrome: its impact on jurors' decisions.
    Schuller RA; Rzepa S
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Dec; 26(6):655-73. PubMed ID: 12508700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On finding for defendants who plead insanity: the crucial impact of dispositional instructions and opportunity to deliberate.
    Wheatman SR; Shaffer DR
    Law Hum Behav; 2001 Apr; 25(2):167-83. PubMed ID: 11419381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gender, Generations, and Guilt: Defendant Gender and Age Affect Jurors' Decisions and Perceptions in an Intimate Partner Homicide Trial.
    Ruva CL; Smith KD; Sykes EC
    J Interpers Violence; 2023 Dec; 38(23-24):12089-12112. PubMed ID: 37602736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Effects of Victim Gender Identity, Juror Gender, and Judicial Instructions on Victim Blaming, Crime Severity Ratings, and Verdicts in Sexual Assault Trials.
    Carter LM; Goodmon LB; Urs M; Rutledge-Jukes H
    J Homosex; 2023 May; 70(6):1187-1224. PubMed ID: 35171085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The civil liability for damages of the criminally insane.
    Melamed Y; Ganot N; Mester R; Bleich A
    Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 2008; 45(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 19439834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Racial Composition of Couples in Battered Spouse Syndrome Cases: A Look at Juror Perceptions and Decisions.
    Mossière A; Maeder EM; Pica E
    J Interpers Violence; 2018 Sep; 33(18):2867-2890. PubMed ID: 26917572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Juror and expert conceptions of battered women.
    Dodge M; Greene E
    Violence Vict; 1991; 6(4):271-82. PubMed ID: 1822697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of mock jury gender composition on deliberations and conviction rates in a child sexual assault trial.
    Golding JM; Bradshaw GS; Dunlap EE; Hodell EC
    Child Maltreat; 2007 May; 12(2):182-90. PubMed ID: 17446571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Women who kill: the impact of abuse.
    Grant CA
    Issues Ment Health Nurs; 1995; 16(4):315-26. PubMed ID: 7615379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Proven and not proven: A potential alternative to the current Scottish verdict system.
    Curley LJ; Munro J; Turner J; Frumkin LA; Jackson E; Lages M
    Behav Sci Law; 2022 May; 40(3):452-466. PubMed ID: 35460096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Distress resulting from perceivers' own intimate partner violence experiences predicts culpability attributions toward a battered woman on trial for killing her abuser: a path model.
    Stein ML; Miller AK
    J Interpers Violence; 2012 Sep; 27(13):2527-44. PubMed ID: 22328653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Keep your bias to yourself: How deliberating with differently biased others affects mock-jurors' guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, memories, and evidence interpretation.
    Ruva CL; Guenther CC
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Oct; 41(5):478-493. PubMed ID: 28714733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of pretrial publicity on mock juror and jury verdicts: A meta-analysis.
    Hoetger LA; Devine DJ; Brank EM; Drew RM; Rees R
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Apr; 46(2):121-139. PubMed ID: 35084906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of race on jurors' perceptions of lethal police use of force.
    Ewanation L; Maeder EM
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Feb; 47(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 36931849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Crime victims serving as jurors: is there bias present?
    Culhane SE; Hosch HM; Weaver WG
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Dec; 28(6):649-59. PubMed ID: 15732651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The influence of decision task and deliberation style on the verdict of the juries].
    Martín ME; de la Fuente EI; García J; De la Fuente L
    Psicothema; 2006 Nov; 18(4):772-7. PubMed ID: 17296116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In the aftermath of State v. Becker: a review of state and federal jury instructions on insanity acquittal disposition.
    Piel J
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(4):537-46. PubMed ID: 23233476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.