These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10810839)

  • 41. Biased interpretation of evidence by mock jurors.
    Carlson KA; Russo JE
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2001 Jun; 7(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 11477983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Perceptions of domestic violence and mock jurors' sentencing decisions.
    Kern R; Libkuman TM; Temple SL
    J Interpers Violence; 2007 Dec; 22(12):1515-35. PubMed ID: 17993639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Mock juror sampling issues in jury simulation research: A meta-analysis.
    Bornstein BH; Golding JM; Neuschatz J; Kimbrough C; Reed K; Magyarics C; Luecht K
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Feb; 41(1):13-28. PubMed ID: 27762572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Juror Decision Making and Euthanasia: Exploring the Role of Jury Nullification, Manner of Death, and Defendant-Decedent Relationship.
    Scott JD; Bell D; Barry B; Edlund JE
    Psychol Rep; 2023 Dec; 126(6):3052-3070. PubMed ID: 35484479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Juror decision making in not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder trials: Effects of defendant gender and mental illness type.
    Mossière A; Maeder EM
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 49(Pt A):47-54. PubMed ID: 27237958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Big girls don't cry: the effect of child witness demeanor on juror decisions in a child sexual abuse trial.
    Golding JM; Fryman HM; Marsil DF; Yozwiak JA
    Child Abuse Negl; 2003 Nov; 27(11):1311-21. PubMed ID: 14637304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. N.C. Supreme Court upholds exclusion of HIV in jury selection.
    AIDS Policy Law; 1995 Sep; 10(16):3-4. PubMed ID: 11362769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The impact of juror characteristics and victim health status on the perception of elder physical abuse.
    Kinstle TL; Hodell EC; Golding JM
    J Interpers Violence; 2008 Sep; 23(9):1143-61. PubMed ID: 18272720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Factors that Influence Mock Jurors' Perceptions of Child Credibility.
    Call AA; Wingrove T
    J Child Sex Abus; 2022; 31(6):726-742. PubMed ID: 35833559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Juror perceptions of child eyewitness testimony in a sexual abuse trial.
    Holcomb MJ; Jacquin KM
    J Child Sex Abus; 2007; 16(2):79-95. PubMed ID: 17895233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Juror stress.
    Hafemeister TL
    Violence Vict; 1993; 8(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 8193058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Compensating plaintiffs and punishing defendants: is bifurcation necessary?
    Greene E; Woody WD; Winter R
    Law Hum Behav; 2000 Apr; 24(2):187-205. PubMed ID: 10810838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A specialized domestic violence court in South Carolina: an example of procedural justice for victims and defendants.
    Gover AR; Brank EM; MacDonald JM
    Violence Against Women; 2007 Jun; 13(6):603-26. PubMed ID: 17515408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Chaos in the courtroom reconsidered: emotional bias and juror nullification.
    Horowitz IA; Kerr NL; Park ES; Gockel C
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Apr; 30(2):163-81. PubMed ID: 16786405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Thin slice expert testimony and mock trial deliberations.
    Parrott CT; Brodsky SL; Wilson JK
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():67-74. PubMed ID: 26346686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Juror characteristics on trial: Investigating how psychopathic traits, rape attitudes, victimization experiences, and juror demographics influence decision-making in an intimate partner rape trial.
    Lilley C; Willmott D; Mojtahedi D
    Front Psychiatry; 2022; 13():1086026. PubMed ID: 36727087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Defendant remorse, need for affect, and juror sentencing decisions.
    Corwin EP; Cramer RJ; Griffin DA; Brodsky SL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 22396340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Deconstructing the simplification of jury instructions: How simplifying the features of complexity affects jurors' application of instructions.
    Baguley CM; McKimmie BM; Masser BM
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Jun; 41(3):284-304. PubMed ID: 28182459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The impact of frequency of behavior and type of contact on judgments involving a criminal stalking case.
    Magyarics CL; Lynch KR; Golding JM; Lippert A
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Dec; 39(6):602-13. PubMed ID: 26237334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. What are we studying? Student jurors, community jurors, and construct validity.
    Keller SR; Wiener RL
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(3):376-94. PubMed ID: 21766327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.