273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10811076)
1. A comparison of digital nonmydriatic fundus imaging with standard 35-millimeter slides for diabetic retinopathy.
Lim JI; LaBree L; Nichols T; Cardenas I
Ophthalmology; 2000 May; 107(5):866-70. PubMed ID: 10811076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of nonmydriatic digitized video fundus images with standard 35-mm slides to screen for and identify specific lesions of age-related macular degeneration.
Lim JI; Labree L; Nichols T; Cardenas I
Retina; 2002 Feb; 22(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 11884880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of retinal lesions in diabetic retinopathy: comparative evaluation of 7-field digital color photography versus red-free photography.
Venkatesh P; Sharma R; Vashist N; Vohra R; Garg S
Int Ophthalmol; 2015 Oct; 35(5):635-40. PubMed ID: 22961609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nonmydriatic ultrawide field retinal imaging compared with dilated standard 7-field 35-mm photography and retinal specialist examination for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy.
Silva PS; Cavallerano JD; Sun JK; Noble J; Aiello LM; Aiello LP
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Sep; 154(3):549-559.e2. PubMed ID: 22626617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Peripheral lesions identified by mydriatic ultrawide field imaging: distribution and potential impact on diabetic retinopathy severity.
Silva PS; Cavallerano JD; Sun JK; Soliman AZ; Aiello LM; Aiello LP
Ophthalmology; 2013 Dec; 120(12):2587-2595. PubMed ID: 23778092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High-resolution stereoscopic digital fundus photography versus contact lens biomicroscopy for the detection of clinically significant macular edema.
Rudnisky CJ; Hinz BJ; Tennant MT; de Leon AR; Greve MD
Ophthalmology; 2002 Feb; 109(2):267-74. PubMed ID: 11825807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of nonmydriatic digital retinal imaging versus dilated ophthalmic examination for nondiabetic eye disease in persons with diabetes.
Chow SP; Aiello LM; Cavallerano JD; Katalinic P; Hock K; Tolson A; Kirby R; Bursell SE; Aiello LP
Ophthalmology; 2006 May; 113(5):833-40. PubMed ID: 16650680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Identification of diabetic retinopathy by stereoscopic digital imaging via teleophthalmology: a comparison to slide film.
Tennant MT; Greve MD; Rudnisky CJ; Hillson TR; Hinz BJ
Can J Ophthalmol; 2001 Jun; 36(4):187-96. PubMed ID: 11428527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The sensitivity and specificity of single-field nonmydriatic monochromatic digital fundus photography with remote image interpretation for diabetic retinopathy screening: a comparison with ophthalmoscopy and standardized mydriatic color photography.
Lin DY; Blumenkranz MS; Brothers RJ; Grosvenor DM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 134(2):204-13. PubMed ID: 12140027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of low-light nonmydriatic digital imaging with 35-mm ETDRS seven-standard field stereo color fundus photographs and clinical examination.
Silva PS; Walia S; Cavallerano JD; Sun JK; Dunn C; Bursell SE; Aiello LM; Aiello LP
Telemed J E Health; 2012 Sep; 18(7):492-9. PubMed ID: 22827402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy.
Rudnisky CJ; Tennant MT; Weis E; Ting A; Hinz BJ; Greve MD
Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1748-54. PubMed ID: 17368543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effectiveness and safety of screening for diabetic retinopathy with two nonmydriatic digital images compared with the seven standard stereoscopic photographic fields.
Boucher MC; Gresset JA; Angioi K; Olivier S
Can J Ophthalmol; 2003 Dec; 38(7):557-68. PubMed ID: 14740797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stereo nonmydriatic digital-video color retinal imaging compared with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study seven standard field 35-mm stereo color photos for determining level of diabetic retinopathy.
Bursell SE; Cavallerano JD; Cavallerano AA; Clermont AC; Birkmire-Peters D; Aiello LP; Aiello LM;
Ophthalmology; 2001 Mar; 108(3):572-85. PubMed ID: 11237913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combined wide-field imaging in grading diabetic retinopathy.
Menean M; Sacconi R; Tombolini B; Fantaguzzi F; Bandello F; Querques G
Eye (Lond); 2024 Jan; 38(1):210-214. PubMed ID: 37524829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characteristics of Retinal Neovascularization in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Imaged by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography.
Ishibazawa A; Nagaoka T; Yokota H; Takahashi A; Omae T; Song YS; Takahashi T; Yoshida A
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Nov; 57(14):6247-6255. PubMed ID: 27849310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of two, three and four 45 degrees image fields obtained with the Topcon CRW6 nonmydriatic camera for screening for diabetic retinopathy.
Perrier M; Boucher MC; Angioi K; Gresset JA; Olivier S
Can J Ophthalmol; 2003 Dec; 38(7):569-74. PubMed ID: 14740798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interobserver agreement in the interpretation of single-field digital fundus images for diabetic retinopathy screening.
Ruamviboonsuk P; Teerasuwanajak K; Tiensuwan M; Yuttitham K;
Ophthalmology; 2006 May; 113(5):826-32. PubMed ID: 16650679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Screening of diabetic retinopathy: effect of field number and mydriasis on sensitivity and specificity of digital fundus photography.
Aptel F; Denis P; Rouberol F; Thivolet C
Diabetes Metab; 2008 Jun; 34(3):290-3. PubMed ID: 18406188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical evaluation of patients with diabetic retinopathy: accuracy of the Inoveon diabetic retinopathy-3DT system.
Fransen SR; Leonard-Martin TC; Feuer WJ; Hildebrand PL;
Ophthalmology; 2002 Mar; 109(3):595-601. PubMed ID: 11874767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing diabetic retinopathy lesions in scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and colour fundus photography.
Nghiem AZ; Nderitu P; Lukic M; Khatun M; Largan R; Kortuem K; Balaskas K; Sim D
Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 97(8):e1035-e1040. PubMed ID: 31286663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
