These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10811167)

  • 1. Motor activation from visible speech: evidence from stimulus response compatibility.
    Kerzel D; Bekkering H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Apr; 26(2):634-47. PubMed ID: 10811167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence for effects of phonological correspondence between visible speech and written syllables.
    Kerzel D
    Psychol Res; 2002 Aug; 66(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 12192448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual-motor processing of phonetic features in speech.
    Gordon PC; Meyer DE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Apr; 10(2):153-78. PubMed ID: 6232338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceiving speech from inverted faces.
    Massaro DW; Cohen MM
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Oct; 58(7):1047-65. PubMed ID: 8920841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Children's perception of visual and auditory speech.
    Massaro DW
    Child Dev; 1984 Oct; 55(5):1777-88. PubMed ID: 6510054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Listening with eye and hand: cross-modal contributions to speech perception.
    Fowler CA; Dekle DJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Aug; 17(3):816-28. PubMed ID: 1834793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory and visual cueing of the [+/- rounded] feature of vowels.
    Lisker L; Rossi M
    Lang Speech; 1992; 35 ( Pt 4)():391-417. PubMed ID: 1339920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of visual speech cues in reducing energetic and informational masking.
    Helfer KS; Freyman RL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Feb; 117(2):842-9. PubMed ID: 15759704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. McGurk effect in non-English listeners: few visual effects for Japanese subjects hearing Japanese syllables of high auditory intelligibility.
    Sekiyama K; Tohkura Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1797-805. PubMed ID: 1960275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cross-language specialization in phonetic processing: English and Hindi perception of /w/-/v/ speech and nonspeech.
    Iverson P; Wagner A; Pinet M; Rosen S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):EL297-303. PubMed ID: 22088031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Phonetic recalibration of speech by text.
    Keetels M; Schakel L; Bonte M; Vroomen J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Apr; 78(3):938-45. PubMed ID: 26704562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adaptation of neuromagnetic N1 responses to phonetic stimuli by visual speech in humans.
    Jääskeläinen IP; Ojanen V; Ahveninen J; Auranen T; Levänen S; Möttönen R; Tarnanen I; Sams M
    Neuroreport; 2004 Dec; 15(18):2741-4. PubMed ID: 15597045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. La langue et les Lèvres: cross-language influences on bimodal speech perception.
    Werker JF; Frost PE; McGurk H
    Can J Psychol; 1992 Dec; 46(4):551-68. PubMed ID: 1286433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Short-term exposure to one dialect affects processing of another.
    Hay J; Drager K; Warren P
    Lang Speech; 2010; 53(Pt 4):447-71. PubMed ID: 21313989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of speaking rate on the perceptual structure of a phonetic category.
    Miller JL; Volaitis LE
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Dec; 46(6):505-12. PubMed ID: 2587179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceptuomotor compatibility effects in speech.
    Galantucci B; Fowler CA; Goldstein L
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):1138-49. PubMed ID: 19525543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Audio-visual speech perception is special.
    Tuomainen J; Andersen TS; Tiippana K; Sams M
    Cognition; 2005 May; 96(1):B13-22. PubMed ID: 15833302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of the McGurk effect for spoken and sung syllables.
    Quinto L; Thompson WF; Russo FA; Trehub SE
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1450-4. PubMed ID: 20675792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Listening to talking faces: motor cortical activation during speech perception.
    Skipper JI; Nusbaum HC; Small SL
    Neuroimage; 2005 Mar; 25(1):76-89. PubMed ID: 15734345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of tonal movement and vowel quality on intelligibility in singing.
    Andreas T
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2006; 31(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 16517520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.