These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10811167)

  • 21. Acoustic-phonetic contrasts and intelligibility in the dysarthria associated with mixed cerebral palsy.
    Ansel BM; Kent RD
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Apr; 35(2):296-308. PubMed ID: 1573870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Perceptual learning of phonetic information that indicates morphological structure.
    Barden K; Hawkins S
    Phonetica; 2013; 70(4):323-42. PubMed ID: 24514161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition.
    Mullennix JW; Pisoni DB; Martin CS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):365-78. PubMed ID: 2921419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native talkers.
    van Wijngaarden SJ; Steeneken HJ; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Dec; 112(6):3004-13. PubMed ID: 12509022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Read my lips: asymmetries in the visual expression and perception of speech revealed through the McGurk effect.
    Nicholls ME; Searle DA; Bradshaw JL
    Psychol Sci; 2004 Feb; 15(2):138-41. PubMed ID: 14738522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Some effects of acoustic attributes of speech on the processing of phonetic feature information.
    Soli SD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1980 Nov; 6(4):622-38. PubMed ID: 6449534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Errors on cues for consonant identification on auditory and visual word-recognition tasks.
    Berryman L; Dancer J; Drummond S
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Apr; 82(2):702. PubMed ID: 8724949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Some effects of speaking rate on phonetic perception.
    Miller JL
    Phonetica; 1981; 38(1-3):159-80. PubMed ID: 7267718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The influence of selective attention to auditory and visual speech on the integration of audiovisual speech information.
    Buchan JN; Munhall KG
    Perception; 2011; 40(10):1164-82. PubMed ID: 22308887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cultural and linguistic factors in audiovisual speech processing: the McGurk effect in Chinese subjects.
    Sekiyama K
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Jan; 59(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 9038409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Neural indices of phonemic discrimination and sentence-level speech intelligibility in quiet and noise: A P3 study.
    Koerner TK; Zhang Y; Nelson PB; Wang B; Zou H
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():58-67. PubMed ID: 28441570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Impaired speech perception in poor readers: evidence from hearing and speech reading.
    de Gelder B; Vroomen J
    Brain Lang; 1998 Oct; 64(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 9743542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Audiovisual integration and lipreading abilities of older adults with normal and impaired hearing.
    Tye-Murray N; Sommers MS; Spehar B
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):656-68. PubMed ID: 17804980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Typically Efficient Lipreading without Motor Simulation.
    Vannuscorps G; Andres M; Carneiro SP; Rombaux E; Caramazza A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2021 Apr; 33(4):611-621. PubMed ID: 33416443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Integral processing of visual place and auditory voicing information during phonetic perception.
    Green KP; Kuhl PK
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Feb; 17(1):278-88. PubMed ID: 1826317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The role of continuous low-frequency harmonicity cues for interrupted speech perception in bimodal hearing.
    Oh SH; Donaldson GS; Kong YY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Apr; 139(4):1747. PubMed ID: 27106322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An audiovisual test of kinematic primitives for visual speech perception.
    Rosenblum LD; Saldaña HM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1996 Apr; 22(2):318-31. PubMed ID: 8934846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Similarity structure in visual speech perception and optical phonetic signals.
    Jiang J; Auer ET; Alwan A; Keating PA; Bernstein LE
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 Oct; 69(7):1070-83. PubMed ID: 18038946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cross-modal speech perception in adults and infants using nonspeech auditory stimuli.
    Kuhl PK; Williams KA; Meltzoff AN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Aug; 17(3):829-40. PubMed ID: 1834794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An examination of error reductions in consonant recognition when vision and hearing are combined.
    Berryman L; Dancer J; Burl N
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Apr; 82(2):558. PubMed ID: 8724928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.