These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10811177)

  • 21. Super face-inversion effects for isolated internal or external features, and for fractured faces.
    Moscovitch M; Moscovitch DA
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2000 Feb; 17(1):201-19. PubMed ID: 20945180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Determining the influence of Gaussian blurring on inversion effects with talking faces.
    Thomas SM; Jordan TR
    Percept Psychophys; 2002 Aug; 64(6):932-44. PubMed ID: 12269300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of inversion on the encoding of normal and "thatcherized" faces.
    Boutsen L; Humphreys GW
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Aug; 56(6):955-75. PubMed ID: 12881166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The nature of upright and inverted face representations: an adaptation-transfer study of configuration.
    Pichler P; Dosani M; Oruç I; Barton JJ
    Cortex; 2012 Jun; 48(6):725-36. PubMed ID: 21396633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A unique look at face processing: the impact of masked faces on the processing of facial features.
    Williams MA; Moss SA; Bradshaw JL
    Cognition; 2004 Mar; 91(2):155-72. PubMed ID: 14738771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Inversion leads to quantitative, not qualitative, changes in face processing.
    Sekuler AB; Gaspar CM; Gold JM; Bennett PJ
    Curr Biol; 2004 Mar; 14(5):391-6. PubMed ID: 15028214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The influence of divided attention on holistic face perception.
    Palermo R; Rhodes G
    Cognition; 2002 Jan; 82(3):225-57. PubMed ID: 11747863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Thatcher illusion reveals orientation dependence in brain regions involved in processing facial expressions.
    Psalta L; Young AW; Thompson P; Andrews TJ
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Jan; 25(1):128-36. PubMed ID: 24264941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Feature-location effects in the Thatcher illusion.
    de Haas B; Schwarzkopf DS
    J Vis; 2018 Apr; 18(4):16. PubMed ID: 29710306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Attending to faces: change detection, familiarization, and inversion effects.
    Barton JJ; Deepak S; Malik N
    Perception; 2003; 32(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 12613783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Why is the N170 enhanced for inverted faces? An ERP competition experiment.
    Sadeh B; Yovel G
    Neuroimage; 2010 Nov; 53(2):782-9. PubMed ID: 20558303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Generalization to novel images in upright and inverted faces.
    Moses Y; Ullman S; Edelman S
    Perception; 1996; 25(4):443-61. PubMed ID: 8817621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of motion and audio-visual redundancy on upright and inverted face and feature preferences in 4-13-month old pre- and full-term NICU graduates.
    Kittler PM; Kim SY; Flory MJ; Phan HTT; Karmel BZ; Gardner JM
    Infant Behav Dev; 2020 Aug; 60():101439. PubMed ID: 32438215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Visual search for orientation of faces by a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes): face-specific upright superiority and the role of facial configural properties.
    Tomonaga M
    Primates; 2007 Jan; 48(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 16969584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Configural features in the context of upright and inverted faces.
    Leder H; Candrian G; Huber O; Bruce V
    Perception; 2001; 30(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 11257979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Visual influences on alignment to voice onset time.
    Sanchez K; Miller RM; Rosenblum LD
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Apr; 53(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 20220027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Degradation of labial information modifies audiovisual speech perception in cochlear-implanted children.
    Huyse A; Berthommier F; Leybaert J
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):110-21. PubMed ID: 23059850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sensitivity to the displacement of facial features in negative and inverted images.
    Kemp R; McManus C; Pigott T
    Perception; 1990; 19(4):531-43. PubMed ID: 2096371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Audiovisual speech perception in Williams syndrome.
    Böhning M; Campbell R; Karmiloff-Smith A
    Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(8):1396-406. PubMed ID: 11931944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of repetition learning on upright, inverted and contrast-reversed face processing using ERPs.
    Itier RJ; Taylor MJ
    Neuroimage; 2004 Apr; 21(4):1518-32. PubMed ID: 15050576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.