These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10813012)

  • 1. Why randomized controlled trials fail but needn't: a new series is launched.
    Sackett DL; Hoey J
    CMAJ; 2000 May; 162(9):1301-2. PubMed ID: 10813012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Why randomized controlled trials fail but needn't: 1. Failure to gain "coal-face" commitment and to use the uncertainty principle.
    Sackett DL
    CMAJ; 2000 May; 162(9):1311-4. PubMed ID: 10813014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Why Sackett's analysis of randomized controlled trials fails, but needn't.
    Shapiro SH; Glass KC
    CMAJ; 2000 Oct; 163(7):834-5. PubMed ID: 11033712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Commentary: Measuring the success of blinding in RCTs: don't, must, can't or needn't?
    Sackett DL
    Int J Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 36(3):664-5. PubMed ID: 17675306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Why randomized controlled trials fail but needn't: 2. Failure to employ physiological statistics, or the only formula a clinician-trialist is ever likely to need (or understand!).
    Sackett DL
    CMAJ; 2001 Oct; 165(9):1226-37. PubMed ID: 11706914
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Registries versus trials for the evaluation of the endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Wyatt MG
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2005 Jun; 29(6):560-2. PubMed ID: 15878529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Surgery of primary inguinal hernias].
    Tamme C; Köckerling F
    Chirurg; 2004 Mar; 75(3):315-6; author reply 317-8. PubMed ID: 15024481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Re: Editorial comment on open donor, laparoscopic donor and hand assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a comparison of outcomes.
    Wolf JS
    J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):199. PubMed ID: 12050530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comments on "The impact of the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Treatment Trial (ISAT) on neurosurgical practice".
    Hernesniemi J; Koivisto T
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2004 Feb; 146(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 14963759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hypnosis and smoking cessation: the state of the science.
    Lynn SJ; Green JP; Accardi M; Cleere C
    Am J Clin Hypn; 2010 Jan; 52(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 20187336
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Keeping 'em honest: the current crisis of confidence in antidepressants.
    Teboul E
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2011 Jul; 72(7):1015; author reply 1015-6. PubMed ID: 21824461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Routine psychological treatment and the Dodo verdict: a rejoinder to Clark et al. (2007).
    Stiles WB; Barkham M; Mellor-Clark J; Connell J
    Psychol Med; 2008 Jun; 38(6):905-10; discussion 910. PubMed ID: 18261246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy vs. effectiveness in psychiatric research.
    Summerfelt WT; Meltzer HY
    Psychiatr Serv; 1998 Jun; 49(6):834-5. PubMed ID: 9634169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Clinical trials in orthopedic and trauma surgery: randomized or non-randomized?].
    Stengel D; Bauwens K; Ekkernkamp A
    Unfallchirurg; 2003 Apr; 106(4):294-9. PubMed ID: 12719849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Community-based health intervention trials: an overview of methodological issues.
    Atienza AA; King AC
    Epidemiol Rev; 2002; 24(1):72-9. PubMed ID: 12119859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing risk of bias in randomized controlled trials.
    Purgato M; Barbui C; Cipriani A
    Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc; 2010; 19(4):296-7. PubMed ID: 21322502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Definition of failed lysis may have influenced outcome in the MERLIN trial.
    Osman F; Chit A; Glennon PE
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Mar; 45(5):808; author reply 808-9. PubMed ID: 15734633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contented but not better: problems with satisfaction.
    Norquist GS
    Psychiatr Serv; 2009 Jul; 60(7):867. PubMed ID: 19564214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Why are guidelines more irrational than metaanalyses].
    Steinert T
    Psychiatr Prax; 2009 Jul; 36(5):238-42. PubMed ID: 19455484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bias in research and conflict of interest: why should we care?
    Dietz HP
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2007 Mar; 18(3):241-3. PubMed ID: 17120173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.