196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10813743)
21. A comparative in vivo evaluation of bioactive glasses and bioactive glass-based composites for bone tissue repair.
Bellucci D; Anesi A; Salvatori R; Chiarini L; Cannillo V
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2017 Oct; 79():286-295. PubMed ID: 28629020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Apatite-wollastonite containing glass ceramic-fibrin mixture as a bone defect filler.
Ono K; Yamamuro T; Nakamura T; Kakutani Y; Kitsugi T; Hyakuna K; Kokubo T; Oka M; Kotoura Y
J Biomed Mater Res; 1988 Oct; 22(10):869-85. PubMed ID: 2851592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Aging test and dynamic fatigue test of apatite-wollastonite-containing glass ceramics and dense hydroxyapatite.
Kitsugi T; Yamamuro T; Nakamura T; Kakutani Y; Hayashi T; Ito S; Kokubo T; Takagi M; Shibuya T
J Biomed Mater Res; 1987 Apr; 21(4):467-84. PubMed ID: 3034911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Sintering, crystallisation and biodegradation behaviour of Bioglass-derived glass-ceramics.
Boccaccini AR; Chen Q; Lefebvre L; Gremillard L; Chevalier J
Faraday Discuss; 2007; 136():27-44; discussion 107-23. PubMed ID: 17955801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of sol-gel based magnetic 45S5 bioglass and bioglass-ceramics containing iron oxide.
Shankhwar N; Srinivasan A
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2016 May; 62():190-6. PubMed ID: 26952414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Porous bioactive glass and hydroxyapatite ceramic affect bone cell function in vitro along different time lines.
El-Ghannam A; Ducheyne P; Shapiro IM
J Biomed Mater Res; 1997 Aug; 36(2):167-80. PubMed ID: 9261678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Systematic evaluation of the osteogenic capacity of low-melting bioactive glass-reinforced 45S5 Bioglass porous scaffolds in rabbit femoral defects.
Zhang L; Ke X; Lin L; Xiao J; Yang X; Wang J; Yang G; Xu S; Gou Z; Shi Z
Biomed Mater; 2017 Jun; 12(3):035010. PubMed ID: 28589920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Biocompatibility analysis of bioglass® 45S5 and biosilicate® implants in the rabbit eviscerated socket.
Brandão SM; Schellini SA; Moraes AD; Padovani CR; Pellizzon CH; Peitl O; Zanotto ED
Orbit; 2012 Jun; 31(3):143-9. PubMed ID: 22551363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Bone bonding behavior of three kinds of apatite containing glass ceramics.
Kitsugi T; Yamamuro T; Nakamura T; Higashi S; Kakutani Y; Hyakuna K; Ito S; Kokubo T; Takagi M; Shibuya T
J Biomed Mater Res; 1986; 20(9):1295-307. PubMed ID: 3782183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Bonding strength of bonelike apatite layer to Ti metal substrate.
Kim HM; Miyaji F; Kokubo T; Nakamura T
J Biomed Mater Res; 1997; 38(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 9178739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Role of phase separation on the biological performance of 45S5 Bioglass
Kowal TJ; Golovchak R; Chokshi T; Harms J; Thamma U; Jain H; Falk MM
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2017 Sep; 28(10):161. PubMed ID: 28905286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Bone response to three different chemical compositions of fluorcanasite glass-ceramic.
da Rocha Barros VM; Liporaci JL; Rosa AL; Junqueira MC; de Oliveira PT; Johnson A; van Noort R
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2007 Nov; 83(2):480-3. PubMed ID: 17503525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. In vivo bone tissue response to a canasite glass-ceramic.
da Rocha Barros VM; Salata LA; Sverzut CE; Xavier SP; van Noort R; Johnson A; Hatton PV
Biomaterials; 2002 Jul; 23(14):2895-900. PubMed ID: 12069330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Influence of disodium (1-hydroxythylidene) diphosphonate on bonding between glass-ceramics containing apatite and wollastonite and mature male rabbit bone.
Kitsugi T; Yamamuro T; Nakamura T; Oka M; Kokubo T
Calcif Tissue Int; 1993 May; 52(5):378-85. PubMed ID: 8504376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Structural and elemental characterization of glass and ceramic particles for bone surgery.
Sirkiä SV; Nakamura M; Qudsia S; Siekkinen M; Smått JH; Peltonen J; Heino TJ; Hupa L; Vallittu PK
Dent Mater; 2021 Sep; 37(9):1350-1357. PubMed ID: 34175132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Differential healing response of bone adjacent to porous implants coated with hydroxyapatite and 45S5 bioactive glass.
Wheeler DL; Montfort MJ; McLoughlin SW
J Biomed Mater Res; 2001 Jun; 55(4):603-12. PubMed ID: 11288089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Bone-bonding behavior of plasma-sprayed coatings of BioglassR, AW-glass ceramic, and tricalcium phosphate on titanium alloy.
Kitsugi T; Nakamura T; Oka M; Senaha Y; Goto T; Shibuya T
J Biomed Mater Res; 1996 Feb; 30(2):261-9. PubMed ID: 9019492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Analysis of A.W glass-ceramic surface by micro-beam x-ray diffraction.
Kitsugi T; Yamamuro T; Kokubo T
J Biomed Mater Res; 1990 Feb; 24(2):259-73. PubMed ID: 2158498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A comparative study of ultrastructures of the interfaces between four kinds of surface-active ceramic and bone.
Neo M; Kotani S; Nakamura T; Yamamuro T; Ohtsuki C; Kokubo T; Bando Y
J Biomed Mater Res; 1992 Nov; 26(11):1419-32. PubMed ID: 1447227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Bone-bonding behavior under load-bearing conditions of an alumina ceramic implant incorporating beads coated with glass-ceramic containing apatite and wollastonite.
Li ZL; Kitsugi T; Yamamuro T; Chang YS; Senaha Y; Takagi H; Nakamura T; Oka M
J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Sep; 29(9):1081-8. PubMed ID: 8567706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
