These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10815360)

  • 1. A comparison of standard gamble, time trade-off, and adjusted time trade-off scores.
    Martin AJ; Glasziou PP; Simes RJ; Lumley T
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2000; 16(1):137-47. PubMed ID: 10815360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of caregiver and parenting status on time trade-off and standard gamble utility scores for health state descriptions.
    Matza LS; Boye KS; Feeny DH; Johnston JA; Bowman L; Jordan JB
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2014 Apr; 12():48. PubMed ID: 24716709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interpretation of health and vision utilities in low vision patients.
    Malkin AG; Goldstein JE; Massof RW
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Mar; 89(3):288-95. PubMed ID: 22227913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new explanation for the difference between time trade-off utilities and standard gamble utilities.
    Bleichrodt H
    Health Econ; 2002 Jul; 11(5):447-56. PubMed ID: 12112493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Examination of assumptions in using time tradeoff and standard gamble utilities in individuals with spinal cord injury.
    Lin MR; Yu WY; Wang SC
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Feb; 93(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 22289233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Health State Utilities for Patient's Current Health from Bipolar Type I Disorder.
    Banihashemian M; Rashidian A; Gholamian F; Parsaeian M; Moradi N; Amini H
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2018 Mar; 21(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 29643263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A psychometric analysis of the measurement level of the rating scale, time trade-off, and standard gamble.
    Cook KF; Ashton CM; Byrne MM; Brody B; Geraci J; Giesler RB; Hanita M; Souchek J; Wray NP
    Soc Sci Med; 2001 Nov; 53(10):1275-85. PubMed ID: 11676400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Utility assessment in cancer patients: adjustment of time tradeoff scores for the utility of life years and comparison with standard gamble scores.
    Stiggelbout AM; Kiebert GM; Kievit J; Leer JW; Stoter G; de Haes JC
    Med Decis Making; 1994; 14(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 8152360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring utilities of severe facial disfigurement and composite tissue allotransplantation of the face in patients with severe face and neck burns from the perspectives of the general public, medical experts and patients.
    Chuback J; Yarascavitch B; Yarascavitch A; Kaur MN; Martin S; Thoma A
    Burns; 2015 Nov; 41(7):1524-31. PubMed ID: 26068209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sagittal craniosynostosis: a utility outcomes study.
    Kuta V; McNeely PD; Walling S; Bezuhly M
    J Neurosurg Pediatr; 2017 Aug; 20(2):113-118. PubMed ID: 28524791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. QALYs without bias? Nonparametric correction of time trade-off and standard gamble weights based on prospect theory.
    Lipman SA; Brouwer WBF; Attema AE
    Health Econ; 2019 Jul; 28(7):843-854. PubMed ID: 31237093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Health State Utility Measures in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.
    Noel CW; Lee DJ; Kong Q; Xu W; Simpson C; Brown D; Gilbert RW; Gullane PJ; Irish JC; Huang SH; O'Sullivan B; Goldstein DP; de Almeida JR
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Aug; 141(8):696-703. PubMed ID: 26204439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Thigh laxity after massive weight loss: a utilities outcomes assessment.
    Izadpanah A; Sinno H; Vorstenbosch J; Lee BT; Lin SJ
    Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Sep; 71(3):304-7. PubMed ID: 23788144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What utility scores do mental health service users, healthcare professionals and members of the general public attribute to different health states? A co-produced mixed methods online survey.
    Flood C; Barlow S; Simpson A; Burls A; Price A; Cartwright M; Brini S;
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0205223. PubMed ID: 30352071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Utility assessment in patients with mental disorders: validity and discriminative ability of the time trade-off method.
    König HH; Günther OH; Angermeyer MC; Roick C
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2009; 27(5):405-19. PubMed ID: 19586078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the (not so) constant proportional trade-off in TTO.
    Attema AE; Brouwer WB
    Qual Life Res; 2010 May; 19(4):489-97. PubMed ID: 20151207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of living with a functional and aesthetic nasal deformity after primary rhinoplasty: a utility outcomes score assessment.
    Sinno H; Izadpanah A; Thibaudeau S; Christodoulou G; Tahiri Y; Slavin SA; Lin SJ
    Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Oct; 69(4):431-4. PubMed ID: 22964667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Association of Hair Loss With Health Utility Measurements Before and After Hair Transplant Surgery in Men and Women.
    Abt NB; Quatela O; Heiser A; Jowett N; Tessler O; Lee LN
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2018 Dec; 20(6):495-500. PubMed ID: 30242313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correcting biases in standard gamble and time tradeoff utilities.
    van Osch SM; Wakker PP; van den Hout WB; Stiggelbout AM
    Med Decis Making; 2004; 24(5):511-7. PubMed ID: 15359000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The utility assessment method order influences measurement of parents' risk attitude.
    Finnell SM; Carroll AE; Downs SM
    Value Health; 2012; 15(6):926-32. PubMed ID: 22999143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.