These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10815600)

  • 21. Immediate provisionalization of single-tooth implants in fresh-extraction sites at the maxillary esthetic zone: up to 6 years of follow-up.
    Mijiritsky E; Mardinger O; Mazor Z; Chaushu G
    Implant Dent; 2009 Aug; 18(4):326-33. PubMed ID: 19667821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Single molar replacement with a progressive thread design implant system: a retrospective clinical report.
    Romanos GE; Nentwig GH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(6):831-6. PubMed ID: 11151582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Multicenter retrospective study of cement-retained implant-supported anterior partial prostheses: success and restoration evaluation.
    Khraisat A; Jebreen SE; Baqain ZH; Smadi L; Bakaeen L; Abu-Hammad O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):705-8. PubMed ID: 18807568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinical application of narrow Brånemark System implants for single-tooth restorations.
    Polizzi G; Fabbro S; Furri M; Herrmann I; Squarzoni S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):496-503. PubMed ID: 10453663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Implant-supported fixed partial prostheses: a retrospective study.
    Johansson LA; Ekfeldt A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 12737250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles by means of five TiUnite implants after one-stage surgery: a 1-year retrospective study of 90 patients.
    Friberg B; Jemt T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 18254740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical evaluation of single-tooth mini-implant restorations: a five-year retrospective study.
    Vigolo P; Givani A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 10898842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Five-year results of implants with an oxidized surface placed predominantly in soft quality bone and subjected to immediate occlusal loading.
    Glauser R; Zembic A; Ruhstaller P; Windisch S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6 Suppl):S59-68. PubMed ID: 17618935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A 5-year prospective study of implant-supported single-tooth replacements.
    Gibbard LL; Zarb G
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2002 Feb; 68(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 11869501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of custom-made procera ceramic abutments for single-implant tooth replacement: a prospective 1-year follow-up study.
    Henriksson K; Jemt T
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(6):626-30. PubMed ID: 14714842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Changes in the outcome of metal-ceramic tooth-supported single crowns and FDPs following the introduction of osseointegrated implant dentistry into a prosthodontic practice.
    Walton TR
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):260-7. PubMed ID: 19548408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Retrospective analysis of porcelain failures of metal ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures supported by 729 implants in 152 patients: patient-specific and implant-specific predictors of ceramic failure.
    Kinsel RP; Lin D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):388-94. PubMed ID: 19463666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Experimental zirconia abutments for implant-supported single-tooth restorations in esthetically demanding regions: 4-year results of a prospective clinical study.
    Glauser R; Sailer I; Wohlwend A; Studer S; Schibli M; Schärer P
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(3):285-90. PubMed ID: 15237873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Single-tooth implants and their role in preserving remaining teeth: a 10-year survival study.
    Priest G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(2):181-8. PubMed ID: 10212534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported single-tooth crowns: a 4-year prospective clinical study.
    Vigolo P; Givani A; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):260-5. PubMed ID: 15101598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A prospective multicenter clinical study of the Osseotite implant: four-year interim report.
    Testori T; Wiseman L; Woolfe S; Porter SS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 11324207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical evaluation of single-tooth restorations supported by osseointegrated implants: a retrospective study.
    Ekfeldt A; Carlsson GE; Börjesson G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1994; 9(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 8206553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Astra Tech Single-Tooth Implant System: a report on 27 consecutively placed and restored implants.
    Norton MR
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1997 Dec; 17(6):574-83. PubMed ID: 9497744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of distraction implants for prosthetic treatment after vertical alveolar ridge distraction: a clinical investigation.
    Feichtinger M; Gaggl A; Schultes G; Kärcher H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 12675450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Aesthetic outcome of single-tooth implant restorations following early implant placement and guided bone regeneration: crown and soft tissue dimensions compared with contralateral teeth.
    Cosyn J; De Rouck T
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1063-9. PubMed ID: 19519788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.