350 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10816407)
1. Ultrasound guided core biopsy of suspicious mammographic calcifications using high frequency and power Doppler ultrasound.
Teh WL; Wilson AR; Evans AJ; Burrell H; Pinder SE; Ellis IO
Clin Radiol; 2000 May; 55(5):390-4. PubMed ID: 10816407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stereotactic and sonographic large-core biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: results of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group V study.
Fajardo LL; Pisano ED; Caudry DJ; Gatsonis CA; Berg WA; Connolly J; Schnitt S; Page DL; McNeil BJ;
Acad Radiol; 2004 Mar; 11(3):293-308. PubMed ID: 15035520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sonographic detection and sonographically guided biopsy of breast microcalcifications.
Soo MS; Baker JA; Rosen EL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Apr; 180(4):941-8. PubMed ID: 12646433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy of microcalcifications detected at screening mammography.
Cho N; Moon WK; Cha JH; Kim SM; Jang M; Chang JM; Chung SY
Acta Radiol; 2009 Jul; 50(6):602-9. PubMed ID: 19449232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital mammography-guided skin marking for sonographically guided biopsy of suspicious microcalcifications.
Cho N; Moon WK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Mar; 192(3):W132-6. PubMed ID: 19234241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. US of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications.
Moon WK; Im JG; Koh YH; Noh DY; Park IA
Radiology; 2000 Dec; 217(3):849-54. PubMed ID: 11110953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ultrasonography-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy of microcalcifications: Comparison of the diagnostic yield of calcified cores and non-calcified cores on specimen radiographs.
Cho N; Moon WK; Chang JM; Park SH; Lyou CY; Park IA
Acta Radiol; 2010 Mar; 51(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 19912076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital imaging improves upright stereotactic core biopsy of mammographic microcalcifications.
Whitlock JP; Evans AJ; Burrell HC; Pinder SE; Ellis IO; Blamey RW; Wilson AR
Clin Radiol; 2000 May; 55(5):374-7. PubMed ID: 10816404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sonographically-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy with digital mammography-guided skin marking of suspicious breast microcalcifications: comparison of outcomes with stereotactic biopsy in Asian women.
Hahn SY; Shin JH; Han BK; Ko EY
Acta Radiol; 2011 Feb; 52(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 21498322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective comparison of stereotaxic fine-needle aspiration versus stereotaxic core needle biopsy for the diagnosis of mammographic abnormalities.
Symmans WF; Weg N; Gross J; Cangiarella JF; Tata M; Mazzo JA; Waisman J
Cancer; 1999 Mar; 85(5):1119-32. PubMed ID: 10091797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The clinical study of high-frequency ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy for breast microcalcifications].
Lian ZQ; Zhang AQ; Wang Q; Zhu CX; Li WP; Xu J; Gao HY; Pan YX; Wu L
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Oct; 49(10):918-22. PubMed ID: 22321683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sonographically guided biopsy of suspicious microcalcifications of the breast: a pilot study.
Soo MS; Baker JA; Rosen EL; Vo TT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Apr; 178(4):1007-15. PubMed ID: 11906892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retrieval rate and accuracy of ultrasound-guided 14-G semi-automated core needle biopsy of breast microcalcifications.
Yi J; Lee EH; Kwak JJ; Cha JG; Jung SH
Korean J Radiol; 2014; 15(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 24497787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Sonographic detection of microcalcifications - potential of new method].
Fischer T; Grigoryev M; Bossenz S; Diekmann F; Bick U; Slowinski T; Thomas A
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Aug; 33(4):357-65. PubMed ID: 22322544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stereotactic 14G core biopsy of non-palpable breast cancer: what is the relationship between the number of core samples taken and the sensitivity for detection of malignancy?
Rich PM; Michell MJ; Humphreys S; Howes GP; Nunnerley HB
Clin Radiol; 1999 Jun; 54(6):384-9. PubMed ID: 10406340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sonographic evaluation of mammographically detected microcalcifications without a mass prior to stereotactic core needle biopsy.
Cheung YC; Wan YL; Chen SC; Lui KW; Ng SH; Yeow KM; Lee KF; Hsueh S
J Clin Ultrasound; 2002; 30(6):323-31. PubMed ID: 12116093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Ultrasound-guided needle biopsy in non-palpable breast lesions. Technic, evaluation, management--72 cases].
Lahaye C; Escolano E; Chirpaz F; Mouriquand J
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1991; 20(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 2019718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Practicing breast imaging in HRT ladies in Thailand.
Bhothisuwan W
J Med Assoc Thai; 2004 Oct; 87 Suppl 3():S169-73. PubMed ID: 21213518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Stereotactic and ultrasound guided fine-needle cytology in nonpalpable breast lesions].
Vielh P; Klijanienko J
Arch Anat Cytol Pathol; 1998; 46(4):237-40. PubMed ID: 9754384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The value of a combination of wire localization and ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy for clustered microcalcifications.
Choo KS; Kwak HS; Tae Bae Y; Lee JY; Lee SJ; Seo HI; Nam SB
Breast; 2008 Dec; 17(6):611-6. PubMed ID: 18653339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
