BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10817182)

  • 1. Magnetic resonance imaging in gastroenterology: time to say good-bye to all that endoscopy?
    Adamek HE; Breer H; Karschkes T; Albert J; Riemann JF
    Endoscopy; 2000 May; 32(5):406-10. PubMed ID: 10817182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [MRI in gastrointestinal diseases].
    Hartmann D; Bassler B; Schilling D; Layer G; Riemann JF
    Med Klin (Munich); 2005 Feb; 100(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 15711908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
    Shimizu S; Kutsumi H; Fujimoto S; Kawai K
    Endoscopy; 1999 Jan; 31(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 10082413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a new technique for evaluating the biliary tract and pancreatic duct.
    Fulcher AS; Turner MA; Zfass AM
    Gastroenterologist; 1998 Mar; 6(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 9531120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients suspected of pancreaticobiliary disease.
    Ainsworth AP; Rafaelsen SR; Wamberg PA; Pless T; Durup J; Mortensen MB
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2004 Jun; 39(6):579-83. PubMed ID: 15223684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Value of magnetic-resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) after unsuccessful endoscopic-retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
    Owens GR; Shutz SM
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Feb; 49(2):265-6. PubMed ID: 10084882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic cholangiopancreatography.
    Schöfl R; Haefner M
    Endoscopy; 2003 Feb; 35(2):145-55. PubMed ID: 12561008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [New diagnostic strategies in biliary-pancreatic diseases].
    Devière J; Matos C
    Rev Med Brux; 2000 Sep; 21(4):A314-7. PubMed ID: 11068486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) from a radiological and gastroenterological perspective].
    Vogl TJ; Zeuzem S; Zangos S; Hammerstingl R
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2009 May; 134(19):1011-4. PubMed ID: 19401971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Gastrointestinal endoscopy--review and perspectives].
    Rosenberg J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2001 Feb; 163(6):766-70. PubMed ID: 11228806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: comparative study with direct cholangiography].
    Basile L; Pezzoto C; Roubicek D; Tempra A; Laborda Molteni J
    Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam; 2000; 30(5):487-90. PubMed ID: 11144943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.
    Bret PM; Reinhold C
    Endoscopy; 1997 Aug; 29(6):472-86. PubMed ID: 9342565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP).
    Vrachliotis TG; Shirkhoda A; Bis KG; Shetty AN; Konez O; Ference JJ; Madrazo BL
    Crit Rev Diagn Imaging; 1997 Aug; 38(4):295-323. PubMed ID: 9376087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography of biliary system abnormalities in children.
    Fitoz S; Erden A; Boruban S
    Clin Imaging; 2007; 31(2):93-101. PubMed ID: 17320775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ERCP and MRCP--when and why.
    Albert JG; Riemann JF
    Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol; 2002 Jun; 16(3):399-419. PubMed ID: 12079266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: current use and future applications.
    Sahni VA; Mortele KJ
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Sep; 6(9):967-77. PubMed ID: 18774532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gastroenterologists and interventional radiologists: friends or foes? A multidisciplinary approach for solving gastrointestinal problems.
    Elfert AA; El-Kalla FS
    Arab J Gastroenterol; 2011 Mar; 12(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 21429447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, intraductal ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in bile duct strictures: a prospective comparison of imaging diagnostics with histopathological correlation.
    Domagk D; Wessling J; Reimer P; Hertel L; Poremba C; Senninger N; Heinecke A; Domschke W; Menzel J
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1684-9. PubMed ID: 15330902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A prospective trial and cost analysis.
    Scheiman JM; Carlos RC; Barnett JL; Elta GH; Nostrant TT; Chey WD; Francis IR; Nandi PS
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Oct; 96(10):2900-4. PubMed ID: 11693324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in diagnosis of biliopancreatic diseases].
    Albert J; Adamek HE; Weitz M; Breer M; Riemann JF
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1998 Sep; 123(39):1149-55. PubMed ID: 9793019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.