These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
62. Comparison of the Haemodynamic Parameters of Venous and Arterial Coronary Artery Bypass Conduits. Zhang JM; Chan CJ; Kang N; Soon JL; Sin KY; Chao VT; Tan TE; Lim CH; Chakaramakkil MJ; Ooi AS; Chua YL; Tan RS; Zhong L Ann Acad Med Singap; 2016 Aug; 45(8):369-72. PubMed ID: 27683743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
63. eComment. The best graft for the right coronary artery. Hajj-Chahine J; Jayle C; Tomasi J; Corbi P Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2012 Aug; 15(2):247. PubMed ID: 22802510 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
64. Application of ultrasonic aspirator for dissection of the internal mammary artery in coronary artery bypass grafting. Suma H; Fukumoto H; Takeuchi A Ann Thorac Surg; 1987 Jun; 43(6):676-7. PubMed ID: 3496061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass controversy: the truly minimally invasive coronary artery bypass versus the "H" graft. Coulson AS; Bakhshay SA; Sloan TJ; Borges MF Ann Thorac Surg; 2000 Apr; 69(4):1297-8. PubMed ID: 10800855 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
66. Mammary artery to saphenous vein bypass graft: an alternative method of redo operation. Panos AL; Houck JP; Chisholm R; Lichtenstein SV; Salerno TA Ann Thorac Surg; 1991 Nov; 52(5):1205-6. PubMed ID: 1953158 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
67. Myocardial revascularization. Indirect approach by internal mammary artery implantation. Direct coronary artery surgery by the saphenous vein graft technique. Favaloro RG Med J Aust; 1972 Aug; 2(1):Suppl:12-3. PubMed ID: 4637357 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
68. Transient radial nerve injury related to the use of a self retaining retractor for internal mammary artery dissection. Guzman F; Naik S; Weldon OG; Hilton CJ J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1989; 30(6):1015-6. PubMed ID: 2600114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. The lesser saphenous vein. An alternative graft for coronary revascularization. Crosby IK; Craver JM Ann Thorac Surg; 1975 Dec; 20(6):703-5. PubMed ID: 1082319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Clinical studies in the selection of patients for coronary artery surgery. Ferguson TB; Weldon CS Adv Exp Med Biol; 1973; 39():243-7. PubMed ID: 4543658 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
75. Y vein? Y not? The underdog of the composite arterial world. Deb S; Fremes SE J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Nov; 150(5):1195-7. PubMed ID: 26383004 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
77. [Application and innovation of aortocoronary bypass--evaluation of application based on experimental studies]. Tanabe T; Ota S; Yokota B; Tamura M; Machida S Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1977 May; 25(5):615-6. PubMed ID: 303657 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. Internal mammary retractor. Beg RA; Naraghipour H; Kay EB; Rullo P Ann Thorac Surg; 1985 Mar; 39(3):286-7. PubMed ID: 2858184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Mammary artery blood flow during several physiological conditions. Burvenich C Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther; 1979 Dec; 242(2):291-3. PubMed ID: 575614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
80. Postoperative myocardial rupture. A complication of internal mammary artery implantation. Cheanvechai C; Effler DB Ann Thorac Surg; 1972 May; 13(5):458-63. PubMed ID: 5022423 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]