BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10818892)

  • 21. Changes in sacral transcutaneous oxygen tension in the evaluation of different mattresses in the prevention of pressure ulcers.
    Colin D; Loyant R; Abraham P; Saumet JL
    Adv Wound Care; 1996; 9(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 8688975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Measurements of interface pressure between body sites and the surfaces of four specialised air mattresses.
    Allen V; Ryan DW; Murray A
    Br J Clin Pract; 1994; 48(3):125-9. PubMed ID: 8031686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Paraplegic body-support pressure on convoluted foam, waterbed, and standard mattresses.
    Wells P; Geden E
    Res Nurs Health; 1984 Jun; 7(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 6565306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of position and mattress overlay on sacral and heel pressures in a clinical population.
    Sideranko S; Quinn A; Burns K; Froman RD
    Res Nurs Health; 1992 Aug; 15(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 1496149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of a range of hospital replacement mattresses.
    Kernohan WG; Witherow A; Allen-Hamilton S; O'Hagan M
    J Wound Care; 1999 Nov; 8(10):495-7. PubMed ID: 10827653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of the effectiveness of assisted turning mattresses and conventional air mattresses in relieving body pressure in different lying positions.
    Wu SV; Kuo LM; Tsai JM; Lin LJ; Chu CH; Liao YY
    Assist Technol; 2024 Jul; 36(4):295-301. PubMed ID: 36445182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Selection of a standard hospital mattress: data-based decision making.
    Barhyte DY; McCance L; Valenta A; Van Tatenhove J; Walker MS; Bethea S
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 1995 Nov; 22(6):267-70. PubMed ID: 8704836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Physiological response of the heel tissue on pressure relief between three alternating pressure air mattresses.
    Goossens RH; Rithalia SV
    J Tissue Viability; 2008 Feb; 17(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 18293766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Principles of alternating pressure surfaces.
    McLeod AG
    Adv Wound Care; 1997; 10(7):30-6. PubMed ID: 9450404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Laboratory performance of alternating pressure air mattresses component and sequelae.
    Bain D
    Br J Nurs; 2011 Nov 10-23; 20(20):S29-34. PubMed ID: 22067933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of body position and mattress type on interface pressure in quadriplegic adults: a pilot study.
    Moody P; Gonzales I; Cureton VY
    Dermatol Nurs; 2004 Dec; 16(6):507-12. PubMed ID: 15690927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Introducing the pressure support surfaces from Kaymed.
    Pritchard B
    Br J Nurs; 2001 Nov 22-Dec 12; 10(21):1427-8, 1430-1. PubMed ID: 11865249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Pressure-reducing mattresses.
    Collier ME
    J Wound Care; 1996 May; 5(5):207-11. PubMed ID: 8850903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A prospective assessment of sacral pressures in healthy volunteers seated upright and reclined with legs elevated in a recliner.
    Miller SK; Aberegg L; Blasiole K; Parker M; Fulton J
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2014 Sep; 60(9):52-9. PubMed ID: 25211607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Quantitative assessment of pressure relief at the sacral area in adults lying supine on the operating room table].
    Masatsugu M; Akata T; Itonaga Y; Nakao F; Kansha M; Sato M; Takamatsu J
    Masui; 2005 Mar; 54(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 15794114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The evaluation of five specialized support surfaces by use of a pressure-sensitive mat.
    Patel UH; Jones JT; Babbs CF; Bourland JD; Graber GP
    Decubitus; 1993 May; 6(3):28-31, 34, 36-7. PubMed ID: 8347281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Relationship between body weight, body position, support surface, and tissue interface pressure at the sacrum.
    Rondorf-Klym LM; Langemo D
    Decubitus; 1993 Jan; 6(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 8427641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the Thermo contour mattress.
    Hampton S
    Br J Nurs; 1999 Aug 12-Sep 8; 8(15):990-6. PubMed ID: 10711028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Pressure-reducing capability of Conforma II mattress overlay.
    Reynolds A; Suarez C
    Adv Wound Care; 1994 Jul; 7(4):36-40. PubMed ID: 7827746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Assessment of alternating air mattresses using a time-based interface pressure threshold technique.
    Rithalia SV; Gonsalkorale M
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1998 Jun; 35(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 9651895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.