These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10820604)

  • 21. Guidance toward and away from distractors in repeated visual search.
    Höfler M; Gilchrist ID; Körner C
    J Vis; 2015; 15(5):12. PubMed ID: 26067530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The roles of distractor noise and target certainty in search: a signal detection model.
    Santhi N; Reeves A
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1235-56. PubMed ID: 15066389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Target enhancement and distractor inhibition affect transitory surround suppression in dual tasks using multiple rapid serial visual presentation streams.
    Wu X; Greenwood P; Fu S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(9):1777-98. PubMed ID: 26447933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Goal-directed guidance of attention: evidence from conjunctive visual search.
    Bacon WJ; Egeth HE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1997 Aug; 23(4):948-61. PubMed ID: 9269723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Visual search reveals a critical component to shape.
    Dickinson JE; Haley K; Bowden VK; Badcock DR
    J Vis; 2018 Feb; 18(2):2. PubMed ID: 29392277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Anomalous global effects induced by 'blind' distractors in visual hemifield defects.
    Van der Stigchel S; Nijboer TC; Bergsma DP; Abegg M; Barton JJ
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Oct; 74(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 20637537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A conjunctive feature similarity effect for visual search.
    Takeda Y; Phillips S; Kumada T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Feb; 60(2):186-90. PubMed ID: 17455054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Age differences in the useful field of view: an eye movement analysis.
    Scialfa CT; Thomas DM; Joffe KM
    Optom Vis Sci; 1994 Dec; 71(12):736-42. PubMed ID: 7898880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The influence of "blind" distractors on eye movement trajectories in visual hemifield defects.
    Van der Stigchel S; van Zoest W; Theeuwes J; Barton JJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Nov; 20(11):2025-36. PubMed ID: 18416675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Visual search as a function of type of prior experience with target and distractor.
    Lubow RE; Kaplan O
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1997 Feb; 23(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 9157182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Performance in simple visual search at threshold contrasts.
    Laarni J; Näsänen R; Rovamo J; Saarinen J
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 Jul; 37(8):1706-10. PubMed ID: 8675416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Search termination when the target is absent: The prevalence of coarse processing and its intertrial influence.
    Cho J; Chong SC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Nov; 45(11):1455-1469. PubMed ID: 31393149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Real-world visual search is dominated by top-down guidance.
    Chen X; Zelinsky GJ
    Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(24):4118-33. PubMed ID: 17005231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Eye and hand movements during reconstruction of spatial memory.
    Burke MR; Allen RJ; Gonzalez C
    Perception; 2012; 41(7):803-18. PubMed ID: 23155732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of spatial position on visual search for 3-D objects.
    Umemura H; Watanabe H; Matsuoka K
    Perception; 2007; 36(8):1229-43. PubMed ID: 17972485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Using interrupted visual displays to explore the capacity, time course, and format of fixation plans during visual search.
    Godwin HJ; Benson V; Drieghe D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Dec; 39(6):1700-12. PubMed ID: 23528001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Ocular measures of redundancy gain during visual search of colour symbolic displays.
    Backs RW; Walrath LC
    Ergonomics; 1995 Sep; 38(9):1831-40. PubMed ID: 7671860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Crowding degrades saccadic search performance.
    Vlaskamp BN; Hooge IT
    Vision Res; 2006 Feb; 46(3):417-25. PubMed ID: 15893785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Saccadic repulsion in pop-out search: how a target's dodgy history can push the eyes away from it.
    Caddigan E; Lleras A
    J Vis; 2010 Dec; 10(14):9. PubMed ID: 21135256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The spatial impact of visual distractors on saccade latency.
    McSorley E; McCloy R; Lyne C
    Vision Res; 2012 May; 60():61-72. PubMed ID: 22469779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.